maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Sat 16 Nov, 2013 02:32 am
@maunas24-10-13,
The eleventh dimension (if necessary) has to be added when space became 3 dimensional.
0 Replies
 
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Sat 16 Nov, 2013 02:33 am
@maunas24-10-13,
he eleventh dimension (if necessary) has to be added when space became 3 dimensional.
0 Replies
 
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Sat 16 Nov, 2013 01:11 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Above i am talking about only the 'spatial dimension' evolution. The temporal dimension had completed it's development before the spatial dimension became 3 dimensional. All dimensions have an evolutionary process
during the origin of the universe.
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Sat 16 Nov, 2013 01:39 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Every thing in this universe is made up of gravitons. Graviton is quantum of space-time which i had called as 'events' in my previous posts in this topic.There is no need to try to detect them. They are self-evident.
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Sun 17 Nov, 2013 02:54 am
@maunas24-10-13,
Near planck length, at the time of the origin of the universe, no particles of matter existed. So the 7 extra spatial dimensions of M-theory do not exist as a physical reality. String theories are only mathematical constructions which try to link quantum mechanics with relativistic mechanics in an abstract manner.
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Sun 17 Nov, 2013 09:39 am
@maunas24-10-13,
If space-time were not quantized, we would not be able to cover distances and time would not pass. I know about infinitesimal and the Newtonian solution of the zeno's paradox but it strikes me as a mathematical construction of convenience which works due to the physical reality of quantization of space-time.

And From: http://www.askamathematician.com/2013/0 ... relevance/
Planck length (or distances of approximately that size- the smallest particle, the electron, is about 10^20 times larger (that’s the difference between a single hair and a large galaxy). ) do show up. In particular, it shows up in the “Generalized Uncertainty Principle” (GUP) where it’s inserted basically as a patch to make physics work in some fairly obscure situations (quantum gravity). The GUP implies that at a small enough scale it is literally impossible, in all situations, to make a smaller-scale measurement. In the right light this makes it look like maybe spacetime is discrete and comes in “smallest units”, and maybe the universe is like the image on a computer screen (made up of pixels). Like a lot of things in string theory (this is an opinion), these sort of patches may prove to be mistakes. So, spacetime may come in discrete chunks, but the most we can say is that those chunks (if they exist) are very, very, very, very small.You’d never notice (at least, the experiments designed to notice haven’t so far). A hydrogen atom is about 10 trillion trillion Planck lengths across.
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Mon 18 Nov, 2013 12:25 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
How to create a new universe: Create quantum vacuum within true i.e absolute vacuum ( timeless, spaceless, 0 Kelvin) Arrange the fields inside the quantum vacuum by using lines & dots of non-baryonic dark matter (wrinkles of spacetime) as you want the fate of that universe to be. The quantum fluctuation which will occur in this cosmic singularity will do the rest.
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Mon 18 Nov, 2013 01:06 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Quantum vacuum states have energies or force fields is the proof that quantums of spacetime (GRAVITONS) are unevenly or liable to get wrinkled (forming dark matter, normal matter) apart from the ability to loose all wrinkles to become dark energy or anti-dark energy.
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Thu 19 Dec, 2013 04:07 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Occam's razor is the principle that the simplest explanation is the best. So, motion= energy= force= matter= space= time. And all of these are quantized.
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Thu 19 Dec, 2013 04:09 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
The universe we are in has 3 macroscopic spatial dimensions, 1 macroscopic time dimension, and 6 microscopic spatial dimensions, in accordance with superstring theory, and then in accordance with holographic supersymmetry, these 10 dimensions actually exist as a holographic projection of still lesser dimensions, but, since dimensions can not exist in the absence of graviton made structures, which in turn do not exist below planck length, suggests that the extra MICROSCOPIC spatial dimensions of superstring theory are probably not real. The so called strings in string theory are multiple orders of magnitude smaller than electrons. No graviton structure of any kind, as is a scientific instrument, capable of detecting these structures.
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Thu 19 Dec, 2013 04:12 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
The natural state of matter is a wave. It only pops out of its wave state (wave function collapse) to form a physical body when it is being observed. Then, when it's not being observed, it goes back into its wave state. Everything we can think of, and can't think of, or has not ever been thought of before now, already exists in wave form in the Field ( as a quantum wave function). Everything (including the observer) pop out of their wave state (wave function collapse) to form a physical body (graviton structures) when they are being observed. Modern ideas coming from black holes tell us that reality is two-dimensional, that the three dimensional world–the full-bodied three dimensional world – is a kind of image of a hologram on the boundary of the region of space.
From OP at: http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=18255
The uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics indicates that true or near true randomness exists, if true randomness exists, then everything imaginable and not imaginable becomes possible, including God/Gods. But if near true randomness exists, it means that there is an agency which has predetermined our existence & evolution at least from the mass level which lies somewhere between quantum mechanic level and relativistic mechanic level of existence.I suspect that the ultimate products of human evolution will be the agency which will predetermine the existence and evolution of the next universe.
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Thu 19 Dec, 2013 04:16 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
The structures made up by gravitons evolve while the quantum fluctuation (wave function) representing their physical bodies, is growing in amplitude. Once the peak amplitude is reached, we will start popping back in to alternate existence /non existence, inside the quantum vacuum from which earlier we had arisen. The same is true for the giant-est wave of the entire physical universe, on which smaller waves like us are sitting.
0 Replies
 
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Thu 19 Dec, 2013 04:16 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
The structures made up by gravitons evolve while the quantum fluctuation (wave function) representing their physical bodies, is growing in amplitude. Once the peak amplitude is reached, we will start popping back in to alternate existence /non existence, inside the quantum vacuum from which earlier we had arisen. The same is true for the giant-est wave of the entire physical universe, on which smaller waves like us are sitting.
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Thu 19 Dec, 2013 11:46 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
The force fields in the quantum vacuum are arranged (by wrinkling of space-time) by using dark matter, in such a way, that the randomness of quantum fluctuations is tamed as per our likes. In our universe there is no other god than the combined humanity of the future.
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Thu 19 Dec, 2013 11:56 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
I am arguing that the structures made up by gravitons evolve while the quantum fluctuation (wave function) representing their physical bodies, is growing in amplitude. A structurally complex entity like man,god or a unicorn or the entire universe pop out and in of quantum vacuum per Planck time, not completely ready made from the beginning of the universe itself. They have to evolve first to become what they are from their primitive physical form. Another stronger god, god hating and killing man, unicorn gods etc are possible to evolve if not in our universe then some other universe.
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Thu 19 Dec, 2013 11:59 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
TIME LINE- Birth of universe-> Evolution of humanity->Manipulation of the structure of space-time of the quantum vacuum in to which the universe is decaying,by humanity.->recreation of the next big bang-> followed by evolution of humanity again. And so the process repeats itself's infinitely.
0 Replies
 
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Thu 19 Dec, 2013 11:59 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
TIME LINE- Birth of universe-> Evolution of humanity->Manipulation of the structure of space-time of the quantum vacuum in to which the universe is decaying,by humanity.->recreation of the next big bang-> followed by evolution of humanity again. And so the process repeats itself's infinitely.
Lordyaswas
 
  0  
Reply Fri 20 Dec, 2013 02:36 am
@maunas24-10-13,
Methinks someone has opened the egg nog.
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Sun 22 Dec, 2013 09:28 am
@Lordyaswas,
In fact a 3D solid body contains many multitudes of more space-time than the volume of space which we see occupied by it. This is because when finally that solid body decays into quantum vacuum the amount of space time released by it (in the form of a sheet of gravitons, the quanta of space time) will be enormous as compared to the volume of space occupied by that 3D solid body.
0 Replies
 
maunas24-10-13
 
  2  
Reply Sun 22 Dec, 2013 09:28 am
@Lordyaswas,
In fact a 3D solid body contains many multitudes of more space-time than the volume of space which we see occupied by it. This is because when finally that solid body decays into quantum vacuum the amount of space time released by it (in the form of a sheet of gravitons, the quanta of space time) will be enormous as compared to the volume of space occupied by that 3D solid body.
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » CRUX OF COSMOS
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/30/2021 at 02:46:27