Brandon9000
 
  0  
Reply Sun 22 Dec, 2013 09:50 am
You have to actually take the 50 physics classes first.
0 Replies
 
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Jan, 2014 03:49 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Dark flow is seen in the movement of galaxy clusters which are, in any case, flowing outwards with the expansion of the universe and

may also have their own individual (or peculiar) motion arising from gravitational interactions.For example, although galaxies have a

general tendency to rush away from each other as space-time expands between them, the Milky Way and the Andromeda Galaxy are

currently on a gravitationally bound collision course.
DARK FLOW: The elementary particle matter of the early universe flowed outwards like branches and sub-branches of a tree. As

some sub-branches grow towards each other, although as a whole the tree is expanding it's branches away from each other outwards,

similarly some galaxies, like the sub-branches, are on a collision course.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2014 01:02 am
@maunas24-10-13,
before the Big Bang the universe was constrained to a line that was 1.616199(97)×10[sup]−35[/sup]m long.

The Planck mass is nature’s maximum allowed mass for point-masses (quanta). If two quanta of the Planck mass or greater met, they could spontaneously form a black hole whose Schwarzschild radius equals their de Broglie wavelength. Once such a hole formed, other particles would fall in, and the black hole would experience runaway, explosive growth (assuming it did not evaporate via Hawking Radiation). Nature’s stable point-mass particles, such as electrons and quarks, are many, many orders of magnitude smaller than the Planck mass and cannot form black holes in this manner. On the other hand, extended objects (as opposed to point-masses) can have any mass. So in my opinion pre-big bang cosmic singularity was 1D .
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_mass

The 1D planck length,which was the cosmic singularity, contained our universe which was enveloped by a timeless, spaceless, 0K absolute vaccum.
Time and space are instantaneous at Planck length because the Units of spacetime (Gravitons) show absolutely random quantum effects which make it impossible to determine the difference between two locations less than one Planck length apart.

maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2014 01:04 am
@maunas24-10-13,
Truly random instantaneous quantum effects of gravitons with instantaneous becoming and unbecoming of (one dimensional) compound masses by them, spread all over the planck length singularity means: You & i & all the so called past, present and future of this universe existed simultaneously as a 1D line along with instantaneous causality. Instantaneous causality started the cosmic inflation, first to 2D and then to 3D. The perception of 3D causality with imperceptibility of instantaneousness is due to expansion of space and the fixing of values of universal physical constants by planck length.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2014 01:07 am
@maunas24-10-13,
As you know, extended objects (as opposed to point-masses) can have any mass, and since every point mass on a Planck length gets extended all over the planck length, the smallness of Planck length is no obstacle for the containment of the whole universe in it.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2014 01:09 am
@maunas24-10-13,
As described in the OP at:http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=18544
That depression is obligatory for differentiation or diversification and inflation is obligatory for growth and both the actions are necessary for each other. The extension of this logic to cosmology means that all motion has wave properties. So expansion of space accelerates and decelerates. First the cosmic singularity inflated very quickly followed by a leisurely phase of expansion and then after about 5 billion years it has again started accelerated expansion. AND WE ARE POSTULATING DARK ENERGY BEHIND THIS PHENOMENON OF ACCELERATION.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Mar, 2014 02:06 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Since many centuries ago, we know the maths of conversion of energy in to force & the reverse. Since about a century we know the maths of conversion of energy into mass & vice versa. We also have the maths of decay of photons into units of spacetime which are constituents of quantum vacuum. Therefore
force, energy, mass, matter, space, time and vacuum are different phases of the same entity.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Mar, 2014 02:54 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Force, energy, mass, matter, space, time and vacuum are different phases of the same entity and all are quantized. The maths for quantum phenomena (randomness or wave) of acceleration & deceleration of spacetime to supraluminal, infraluminal & zero expansion and in the reverse order to Planck length crunch of the universe does not exist.
maunas24-10-13
 
  0  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2014 03:18 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Kinetic Energy can also be determined by taking 'velocity' out of the equation as E = 1/2 mv^2= (ma)d =Fxd . From Einstein's relativity maths,we can know that - 'contraction of 'space' converts 'space' in to time (time dilation) while contraction of 'time' converts 'time' into space.' This indicates that the same entity is changing phase. Since space is expanding, it means that the total potential (magnitude) of time possessed by the universe is decreasing by changing in to space. When the time contained by the universe get's converted fully in to 'space', further expansion of space would 'no more' be possible.
The perception of conversion of time to space 'naturally', through evolution of a mental capacity for dividing distances by a standard of electrical pulse ( eg. NREM sleep wave), gets sensed as 'time'. Along with the perception of direction, the total experience is the perception of 'velocity'. The perception of 'velocity of working' gave sense of power and further, 'power deficiency', sensed as fatigue.
These perceptions are essential for the survival of mobile organisms or organs (eg. to escape from a predator (harm) or reach a source of food or (good) competitively).
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2014 12:54 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
News:
The statement in OP that: DARK ENERGY is the energy of the quantum vacuum which is forming and collecting around the universe since it was born..has now received support : The mysterious dark energy that's driving the universe's accelerated expansion may have its roots in the background "vacuum energy" that pervades all of the cosmos, a new study suggests.

"What we think is happening is a dynamic effect of the quantum vacuum, a parameter that we can calculate," co-author Joan Sola, of the University of Barcelona in Spain, said in a statement. "Nothing is more 'full' than the quantum vacuum since it is full of fluctuations that contribute fundamentally to the values that we observe and measure." See more at : http://www.space.com/25238-dark-energy- ... heory.html
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 06:44 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Contraction of time means increased velocity of events with simultaneous dilation of space (increase in quantum vacuum), so the universal physical constants do not change. But increase in space (vacuum energy) requires energy, this comes from decay of mass to radiant energy which further deacays to quantum vacuum. The reverse of this process i.e, the process of accretion of mass involves the contraction of space with simultaneous dilation of time. The space between heavenly bodies or particles (with or without mass) which contracts tending to create mass or more mass is the force of gravity
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2014 01:15 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Contraction of space tends to cause motion and motion tends to cause contraction of space (Force).
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2014 01:16 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
The entity 'mass', which provides the energy (or force fields for quantum vacuum) for conversion of time in to space is therefore also the entity 'time'. In this way we see that energy, mass, force, space and time is infact the same entity.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2014 01:18 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Motion is therefore conversion of space into time.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2014 02:10 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Matter is a structure made up of space and time (mass). Since motion creates mass from space,stopping the motion of a fundamental particle should make it massless and an entity of 2 dimensions.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2014 03:50 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Matter is a structure made up of space and time (mass). Since motion creates mass from space, resisting the motion of a fundamental particle should make it loose mass (energy) and tend to become an entity of 2 dimensions. Stopping the motion of the particle completely should make it massless and therefore an entity of 2 dimensions.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Apr, 2014 03:04 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Constant motion gives a constant converted amount of space into time (mass). Acceleration goes on creating mass from space (from quantum vacuum force fields/ vacuum energy). All mass produced by acceleration
is positive mass. While mass produced by deceleration from a constant speed is negative mass.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2014 12:36 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
The oneness of mass and time is also apparent when they show the same property of dilation with increase in motion.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Apr, 2014 12:24 am
@maunas24-10-13,
At high energies, quarks tend to become massless because when the distance between the quarks grows, the attractive force grows stronger (resistance to motion) producing a negative mass which cancels out their positive mass.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Apr, 2014 12:25 am
@maunas24-10-13,
The cosmic singularity has a negative mass/energy/time and a negative space/force which equals the positive mass/energy/time and positive space/ force of the universe. Zero mass particle
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » CRUX OF COSMOS
  3. » Page 3
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 07/30/2021 at 01:58:20