Do we really have to take military action to Syria?

@peter jeffrey cobb,

Ohh hehe this guy ?
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Pan_%28mythology%29
I Am just trying to point out there is no winners if the World Nations releases their weapons of mass destruction Smile

So requiring the weapons of mass destruction to be insured against any accidental damage. Well, that will make them very expensive for Nations to afford having them. So it would severely minimize the quantity of them or completely eliminate them from the World in a Peace full manner. Then Nations will be forced to find another way to settle their disputes.

0 Replies

@peter jeffrey cobb,

peter jeffrey cobb wrote:

Finn dAbuzz wrote:
Peter...I'm beginning to suspect your real surname is Pan.

I don't understand? Why Pan?

Note the name of the fictional character "Peter Pan".

I suspect he was criticizing you for making completely unrealistic proposals.

We will never allow anyone to impose any "cost" on us for our ownership of nukes.

2 Replies

@oralloy,

Ooh. Do you plan to use weapons of mass destruction ?

1 Reply

@oralloy,

How many weapons of mass destruction do you plan to use?

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

I would think all the lot if it was deemed necessary.

2 Replies

@spendius,

So Using the whole lot, lets see just in the "Nuclear" weapons of mass destruction category that is about 26,000 warheads.
What would be gained from using the whole "lot" ?
What would be lost from using the whole "lot" ?

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

peter jeffrey cobb wrote:

So Using the whole lot, lets see just in the "Nuclear" weapons of mass destruction category that is about 26,000 warheads.
What would be gained from using the whole "lot" ?
What would be lost from using the whole "lot" ?

If they did use "the whole lot", Peter...wouldn't that really be what you want...NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN POSSESSION OF ANYONE?

0 Replies

@peter jeffrey cobb,

peter jeffrey cobb wrote:

Ooh. Do you plan to use weapons of mass destruction ?

No. On an individual level, assault rifles are the best way to defend oneself.

0 Replies

@spendius,

Quote:

I would think all the lot if it was deemed necessary.

That would be the end of the world.

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

Quote:
I would think all the lot if it was deemed necessary.

That would be the end of the world.

It MIGHT mean the end of humanity...which MIGHT not be all that bad a thing. I MIGHT mean the end of all living matter on planet Earth...which I doubt.

But it most assuredly would not mean the end of the world.

0 Replies

Is there a plan in place were one nuclear weapon of mass destruction is fired and then just one is fired back and that would be the end of them being used? Or is the current plan to fire them off till they are all used?
If the plan is to fire off till they are all used, should all the Nations in the World have a say on how many are allowed to exist, since all the Nations will be affected by it? Wouldn't requiring weapons of mass destruction to be insured against any accidental damage it may cause, be the simplest way to reduce the 25,000 + weapons of mass destruction that currently exists?

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

peter jeffrey cobb wrote:

Is there a plan in place were one nuclear weapon of mass destruction is fired and then just one is fired back and that would be the end of them being used? Or is the current plan to fire them off till they are all used?
If the plan is to fire off till they are all used, should all the Nations in the World have a say on how many are allowed to exist, since all the Nations will be affected by it? Wouldn't requiring weapons of mass destruction to be insured against any accidental damage it may cause, be the simplest way to reduce the 25,000 + weapons of mass destruction that currently exists?

It'd be easier to get all the nuclear powers to have a war...and use all their weapons up on each other...

...than to implement any of the plans you have proposed so far.

What is your point?

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

I understand that is the current plan on how to get rid of them Smile

After they got rid of them using your method... what plan would you propose then to keep it from happening again?

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

peter jeffrey cobb wrote:

I understand that is the current plan on how to get rid of them
After they got rid of them using your method... what plan would you propose then to keep it from happening again?

I suspect that if we used that method...the problem of it "happening again" would no longer be a problem.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Well I suppose then my point is that we don't get a second chance to save your all your friends, family, your own life, everything you posses. In order to do that for you... a plan would have to go into action now, so we can look after your wellbeing Smile

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

peter jeffrey cobb wrote:

Well I suppose then my point is that we don't get a second chance to save your all your friends, family, your own life, everything you posses. In order to do that for you... a plan would have to go into action now, so we can look after your wellbeing

If I...and all my friends, family and possessions are all destroyed...

...SO WHAT?

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Well-it's not very nice and not something one might contemplate with equanimity. At the very least.

1 Reply

@spendius,

spendius wrote:

Well-it's not very nice and not something one might contemplate with equanimity. At the very least.

If the entire planet were destroyed...

...so what?

Contemplate that whatever way you want to, but in the grand scheme of things...it may mean almost nothing.

Planets and suns are destroyed all the time.

2 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

Are you felling suicidal frank? Is there any suicide hotlines you could call? Do you have a family member you could talk to?

1 Reply

@Uncle jeff,

Uncle jeff wrote:

Are you felling suicidal frank? Is there any suicide hotlines you could call? Do you have a family member you could talk to?

No, I am not suicidal at all. I am very content with my life...and happy.

But if we humans finally kill ourselves off...we probably deserve. We'd probably be doing the rest of the galaxy a favor by getting rid of what is looking more and more like a virus every day.

2 Replies

Do we really have to take military action to Syria?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know