Do we really have to take military action to Syria?

I haven't heard that particular argument from the "government." The term "boots on the ground" typically means troops as in the military. No one has denied the unfortunate deaths at Libya, least of all Obama.

I listened to his press conference at the summit, I am not 100% sure but think Obama said the report of enlarged targets was inaccurate. Could be wrong.

I guess that is the way they would do it in the movies.

The guy has an uncanny ability to address a group of polar opposites and have both factions come out thinking he pretty much agreed with both of them - which just isn't possible.

Maybe it just comes naturally for some people.

Nations at conflict should be charged. Clearly you can see the monetary damage it does to the World community. As long as their are at conflict they should compensate right away for the damage it does, until it is ceased. The World community should not be hold responsible for their damage.

until the peoples of this planet approve of a global government there is no authority to set the charges, or to collect.

our government still wants to start another war when all the past wars haven't even been taken care of or paid for.

You are falling all over yourself ignoring the indisputable fact that the USA has always trained and backed death squads across the planet.

The Obama administration is considering a plan to use U.S. military trainers to help increase the capabilities of the Syrian rebels, in a move that would greatly expand the current CIA training being done quietly in Jordan, U.S. officials told The Associated Press on Thursday.

Any training would take place outside Syria, and one possible location would be Jordan.

The officials said no decision had been made, but that discussions were going on at high levels of the government. It comes as the Obama administration prods Congress to authorize limited military strikes against Syrian President Bashar Assad's government in retaliation for a deadly Aug. 21 chemical weapons attack.

The proposal to use the U.S. military to train the rebels — something the administration has resisted through more than two years of civil war — would answer the demands of some lawmakers, including Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., to do more to train and equip the Syrian opposition. President Barack Obama in June decided to provide lethal aid to the rebels, but so far none of that assistance has gotten to the opposition.

Officials said Thursday that talk about a military training mission has increased but that there have been no specific Pentagon recommendations forwarded to the White House on how big it should be or how many troops it should involve.

The CIA has been training select groups of rebels in Jordan on the use of communications equipment and some weapons provided by Gulf states. The new discussions center on whether the U.S. military should take over the mission so that hundreds or thousands can be trained, rather than just dozens.