@Foofie,
Foofie wrote:
The use of words that imply colonization do have a pejorative connotation to many. That being said, it might not have been palatable to use wording for the organizations you mention, since anything "smacking" of Judaism was inviting hostility, in my opinion.
Naturally, Jews being so few in number, relatively speaking, they could not claim that returning to Zion had an impetus based on "lebensraum." Nor, could they "march" into the "Sudetenland" to reclaim a Jewish ethnic area.
In my opinion - and here I'm just referring to the situation in Germany - 'colonisation' was meant in the exactly meaning of the use of this word, like in "Colony South-West Africa".
It might have developped from Zionism, but it actually referred to more than Palestine.
From the "Enquête über die jüdische Orient-Kolonisation" in "Palästina" (1, 1902, pages 12 et seqq.,)
The colonisation wasn't focused to Palestine, but other countries in the 'orient' were possible as well; it was questioned, if only German Jews should colonise or if it was possible that other Jews could immigrate (sic!). The next passages are about economic, monetary, geographic, political .... questions.
That region, which was called "Sudentenland" was "inhabited by mostly German speakers, specifically the border districts of Bohemia, Moravia, and those parts of Silesia located within Czechoslovakia"
Quote:Sudetenland[/url]
In the same issue of the "Palestina" the (Jewish) daily newspaper "Prager Tageblatt" is quoted (on page 44). According to that article, the "Prager Tageblatt" wrote on 2.11. 1901 that during the last 20 years, 20 villages and 13 plantations were built by colonists in Palestine. All stone buildings were built according to European standards, now 1,205 families with 4,935 souls lived there. They were Jews from Russia.