34
   

Are all Republicans Idiots?

 
 
revelette
 
  2  
Mon 22 Jul, 2013 08:29 am
Boehner tries to rebrand failure, defend Congress' ineptitude

Quote:
This Congress is generally perceived as failing miserably when it comes to governing, and a few weeks ago, we learned this perception is quantifiably true: the 113th Congress is on track to pass fewer bills than any since the clerk's office started keeping track in the mid-1940s.

When a reporter asked House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) late last week about the institution's "historically unproductive" nature, the Republican balked. "That's just total nonsense," he snapped, before the question was even finished.

Over the weekend, however, Boehner reversed course, deciding that his unproductive tenure isn't something to be denied; it's something to be celebrated.


House Speaker John Boehner says Congress "ought to be judged on how many laws we repeal."

The Ohio Republican makes the comments on an interview aired Sunday on CBS "Face the Nation." He was responding to a question about how little Congress is doing these days.

Boehner says Congress "should not be judged by how many new laws we create."

Let's appreciate exactly what Boehner is trying to do here. When he and his Republican colleagues sought power, they told the electorate that they would work to find solutions to national problems. After having been unsuccessful, the Speaker of the House has decided to rebrand failure -- he wants credit for his record of futility and expects praise for the fact that he and his caucus have made no legislative progress since he took power three years ago.

Instead of finding solutions to ongoing challenges, Boehner believes Congress should be focusing on undoing solutions to previous challenges. By the Speaker's reasoning, we should probably change the language we use when it comes to Capitol Hill -- Boehner and his colleagues aren't lawmakers, they're lawenders.

The House Speaker is on his way to establishing an accomplishment-free legacy, and at this point, he'd like you to think that's great.

Indeed, the closer one looks at Boehner's argument, the more bizarre it appears.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On the surface, his rhetoric is the epitome of the kind of post-policy nihilism that dominates Republican thought in 2013 -- Boehner doesn't want to build up, he'd rather tear down. Given an opportunity to look forward and make national progress, the Speaker sees value in looking backward and undoing what's already been done.

And just below the surface, the argument reinforces what has long been suspected: House Republicans not only don't have a positive policy agenda, they don't even see the point in pretending to want one.

But then there's the most problematic angle of all. Congress "ought to be judged on how many laws we repeal"? I'm afraid I have bad news for Speaker: Congress isn't repealing laws, either. Indeed, in order for lawmakers to repeal laws, Congress has to -- wait for it -- pass legislation addressing those laws.

In other words, by Boehner's own standards for evaluating Congress on the merits, he's failing.

Don't expect a sudden burst of productivity, either -- after taking four weeks off for the August recess, Boehner announced late last week that the Republican-led House only intends to work nine days in the month of September.

Keep in mind, in election year, we might expect congressional leaders to schedule fewer work days in September because members want to be on the campaign trail, but odd-numbered years are generally supposed to be focused on governing.

It seems getting nothing done is exhausting.

cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 12:36 am
@revelette,
We can't blame Boehner when the electorate keeps voting in Tea Party and Conservatives to congress.

We have found the enemy, and ........
JTT
 
  -1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 10:45 am
@cicerone imposter,
We have found the enemy, and it is us.
0 Replies
 
revelette
 
  1  
Fri 2 Aug, 2013 07:12 am
Rep. Matt Shea: Economy is going to collapse

Quote:
An Eastern Washington legislator, speaking at a “Self-Reliance Rally” of Tea Party activists and survivalists, predicted last weekend that the United States economy is going to collapse and told activists to stock up on ammunition and stay in top physical condition for when that happens.

“We need to prepare for the inevitable collapse that is going to happen: You know it’s going to happen. That’s right, I am a politician and I am standing up here and saying that,” said state Rep. Matt Shea, a Republican from Spokane Valley. The lawmaker’s remarks were reported in the Coeur D’Alene Press.

“When it happens, we need to look at this as an opportunity, not a crisis,” Shea added. “Whose job is liberty? That’s our job.”

Shea recalled advice given to him in the military:

“Be prepared at any given moment to give up your job to do what is right. You have to stand up for what is right — even if it means you have to stand up to your government.”

The “Self-Reliance Rally” was held at Idaho’s Farragut State Park on Lake Pend Oreille. Attended by about 500 people and sponsored by a group called Oath Keepers, it featured training sessions ranging from hand-to-hand combat to field midwife training. An Idaho legislator, state Rep. Vito Barbieri, was also on hand.

Shea is at the far right of the Republican caucus in Olympia.

He is best known for his speech against same-sex marriage in the House last year and as a director of the group Protect Marriage Washington.

Shea is no stranger to controversy. The Spokane Spokesman Review reported an incident, about two years ago, in which he pulled a loaded gun on another motorist in what was described as a road rage incident. He was cited for having a loaded handgun in his pickup truck without a concealed weapons permit.

While a defender of traditional marriage, Shea was also in the news for his recent divorce. The lawmaker’s wife sought two temporary restraining orders and a protection order, and claimed to have been treated like a “possession.” She claimed that Shea insisted that she walk on his left side “because his sword, if he had one, would be on his right side.”

Northeast Washington and far Northern Idaho have been hotbeds of extreme-right groups who fear the United Nations and believe the federal government is undertaking illegal actions.

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 2 Aug, 2013 10:15 am
@revelette,
Republicans are good at fear tactics. The funny thing is that our economy continues to improve even with all the handicaps created by the GOP in congress.

I think they are dumbfounded! They can't figure out why Obama is doing so good when they throw everything in the gears they can to slow our economy. They won't even support legislation to help small businesses. We all know they're out to kill unions that only hurts the middle class.

REMEMBER; there are no middle class or poor in the republican party.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  -1  
Fri 2 Aug, 2013 09:55 pm
@revelette,
Quote:
The “Self-Reliance Rally” was held at Idaho’s Farragut State Park on Lake Pend Oreille.


Gorgeous area! Used to be a pretty little town, Sandpoint, Idaho. It was taken over by the right wing nut cases, the real far right nut cases. Lots of aryan nations people. One famous group did something really dumb to some Black folk who happened to come near their compound. I can't remember what actually happened but the Black folk sued that group and won big time. They lost all their land and their riches in a huge civil settlement.

Maybe the guy was Richard Butler??????
0 Replies
 
wmwcjr
 
  2  
Tue 27 Aug, 2013 08:50 pm
@JamesMorrison,
Yes, JamesMorrison, I realize it's been over a month since you posted this comment. Ordinarily, I wouldn't have bothered posting; but you make a particular characterization of a political nature that I must address.

Before I continue, let me say that I'm neither a Democrat nor a Republican. Because of particular issues, I cannot support either of the two major political parties because I would have to violate my conscience to do so. I have no use for the Libertarians, either. In fact, I've largely given up on politics. Several months ago I stopped reading syndicated columns in the local daily. I even voted for McCain in 2008 (but now wished I hadn't voted at all). In fact, I've given up on voting. (Hey, I live in Texas, one of the reddest states in the country. Every elected official where I live is a Republican. There is no political competitiveness. What's the point?) In other words, I don't have an axe to grind here; but there is a particular claim of a historical nature that I find to be absolutely outrageous and that I feel compelled to refute.

JamesMorrison wrote:
Define 'deep south'. Just because I identified as a registered Democrat does not mean that I agree with those southern Liberal Democrats that opposed the abolition of slavery, wanted gun control (disarming of blacks), pushed Jim Crow laws, opposed desegregation, and opposed both the Voting Rights and Civil Rights Acts.


I'm glad that you support civil rights laws. But your label "southern Liberal Democrats" is outrageous. It's like saying "democratic Nazis" or "democratic Communists." In the realm of politics, the naming of political parties frequently is meaningless. In other words, the party label is nothing more than a label that may have one meaning for an earlier generation, but may have a completely different meaning several generations down the line. What I've always done is view American politics in terms of ideology. In other words, I've wanted to know what the record of political liberalism is and what the record of political conservatism is.

I'm a 63-year-old man who grew up in the state of Texas. Observers of the state's politics would say that Texas had three political parties: the conservative Democrats, the liberal Democrats, and the Republicans. In the late 1980s, conservative Democrats (encouraged by President Reagan) joined the Republican Party, with the result today that the state is dominated by conservative Republicans and the liberal Democrats are shut off from power on the state level.

Likewise, the two major politic parties haven't remained static over a period of generations. From the early 1950s through the 1970s, both parties had a left wing and a right wing. Yes, there were liberal Republicans, the so-called "Rockefeller Republicans" -- who were bitterly opposed by the conservative Republicans (such as William Buckley, Barry Goldwater, Phylis Schlafly, Ronald Reagan, etc., etc.) In the mid 1960s, both parties began to undergo a process of polarization. The Southern segregationist conservative Democrats began to join the Republican Party, as leading Republicans such as Barry Goldwater and Richard Nixon pursued a "Southern strategy." So, today both parties basically consist of only one wing. The Democratic Party really doesn't have a conservative wing; and, likewise, there no longer is a liberal wing of the Republican Party.

The so-called "deep South" has always been a hotbed of conservatism regardless of the party label. The truth of the matter is that Jim Crow was a conservative initiative while the civil rights movement was a liberal initiative -- which is to their credit, historically speaking. Before he supposedly repented of his segregationist stance, George Wallace repeated railed against whom? Did he rail against conservatives? No, he railed against them liberals. The Ku Klux Klan, which predated European fascism, was (and is) a conservative movement. I would challenge anyone to point out a single liberal issue (other than being pro-civil rights) that has been supported by the KKK.

I feel very strongly about this because I grew up under Jim Crow and witnessed just how terrible it was. I've also known several men of the World War II generation (both white Texans) who publicly opposed racial discrimination in the early 1950s, which took a great deal of courage. In fact, I'd say they were cut from the same cloth as Andrei Sakharov. One of them, who was an attorney who represented black Americans in discrimination lawsuits, repeatedly received death threats. On the other hand, I don't know of a single leading conservative who ever condemned Jim Crow and supported civil rights legislation.

So, in conclusion, I say that I don't mean to be confrontational; and I'm certainly not going to engage in name-calling. But your identification of white Southern segregationists as "southern Liberal democrats" is both ludicrous and outrageous.

Incidentally, the U.S. Supreme Court recently gutted the Voting Rights Act. All the Justices who ruled against the Voting Rights Act were conservative Republicans. Image that! (sarcasm intended)
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 27 Aug, 2013 09:09 pm
@wmwcjr,
I agree with you that political labels in the US are meaningless. I'm registered as an Independent, but there is no third party in this country.

The politics in this country has become a joke; people vote for their representatives that produce nothing for the American people. Washington is so broken, they can't even approve the debt ceiling that they themselves vote that approves the spending.

They control the purse strings, then vote not to approve the spending.

Washington is so dysfunctional, why must we spend the money for our government that doesn't perform in accordance with the Constitution. Even the Supreme Court destroyed voting rights.

I have voted in every election since I was old enough to vote; I'm now 78 years old. I may retire from voting on national elections in the future; it's useless trying to vote for our government to work together. I'll continue to vote on local elections.

I'm retiring from this madhouse called voting for our national leaders.



wmwcjr
 
  3  
Tue 27 Aug, 2013 09:45 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I concur with you. There seem to be fewer statesmen these days. Elected representatives of both parties engage in juvenile antics.

By the way, I don't tell other people what they should do. When I said that I had become a nonvoter, I was speaking only for myself. I obviously don't go around telling people they shouldn't vote. That's their own business. The only point I was trying to get across to our previous poster is that I wasn't a participant in the current political scenario.

Regarding the "thumbs down" I received: Now, I realize whoever did it may have done so simply out of personal spite. But if the unidentified individual did have a disagreement with my observations, well, tough! I pointed out historical facts, which I've noticed have not been refuted. Either way, whoever you are, whatever your motive, you're a coward. If you're not willing to personally state your objections to me in a post or even in a PM, you're just a coward. But come to think of it, I rather you not even send me a PM. I prefer to not waste my time with jerks. I seriously doubt I would give you the time of day if I ever met you in real life, coward.
gungasnake
 
  -3  
Tue 27 Aug, 2013 10:54 pm
http://sites.google.com/site/mcguff1/Incompetence.jpg
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Tue 27 Aug, 2013 10:59 pm
@wmwcjr,
Don't let the thumb's down get to you! They're done by people with small minds who don't know how to challenge what you say, so that's their simple minds trying to say something juvenile.

No, you're not the one who influenced my choice not to vote on national elections in the future. I've learned through several decades that our votes are made based on no good choices. I won't even bother holding my nose when I vote; I just refuse to vote on these elections that have no sense of direction for our country. I have better things to do with my time - even if it's just walking in the shopping mall for my constitutional.

humbug! (nonsense)
0 Replies
 
wmwcjr
 
  2  
Wed 28 Aug, 2013 12:16 am
@gungasnake,
I have no idea if you're responding to my post or all the members who support President Obama. If you would please read my post, you will find out whom I voted for in the 2008 presidential election. I did not vote last year. It wouldn't have made any difference if I had. Romney carried Texas easily. In other words, I am not a supporter of President Obama (or the Republicans, for that matter); so, if you're addressing your post to me, you're barking up the wrong tree. I might even agree with you on a few issues. You never know.

@cicerone imposter,
Thank you very much for your encouragement! Smile My problem is that I'm too thin-skinned for my own good and sometimes become impatient online. Laughing Besides, I shouldn't be posting when I'm sick, anyway.

I, too, get tired of the "lesser of two evils" argument regarding the choice of candidates at the polls. I hope I'm absolutely wrong; but I fear our country may be facing some really horrendous times regarding the economy, and I don't see much political leadership on the part of either party. I know nothing about how the economy works, but I'm not optimistic. But like I said, I know nothing about the economy; so, I hope I'm absolutely wrong!

Thanks again for your encouragement! Smile





Below viewing threshold (view)
gungasnake
 
  -3  
Wed 28 Aug, 2013 06:22 am
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/image_content_width/hash/86/52/1342496697_4637_al_sharpton.jpg?itok=4wqY4YA_

The Face of the DemoKKKrat Party...

http://wiredrightcommentary.blogspot.com/2013/07/lean-forward-listen-up-protest-we-much.html

Quote:
Al Sharpton, race baiting street hustler and absolutely irrelevant community activist. Sharpton is an insult to the memory of Martin Luther King, Jr. Sharpton is a buffoon stuck in the 1950's and 60's mentality, because he believes that makes him relevant in today's world. The civil rights movement has passed him by and now he has made a very comfortable living out of pretending to be a civil rights leader. Sharpton is a carbuncle on the ass of Black America. He stands out, but in a bad way. He has no useful function, yet he is difficult to ignore for all the pain he inflicts all in the name of social justice for Blacks, who he uses for his own personal gain.



"Protest We Much" appears to be some sort of a sharptonism, i.e. an ebonics equivalent of "some one set us up the bomb" or something like that.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -3  
Wed 28 Aug, 2013 06:29 am
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BB4WwJ5NqKM/UgCMCdQHk_I/AAAAAAAAKWc/SZG6U7elgTM/s1600/Sharpton+and+Brawley.png
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 28 Aug, 2013 10:36 am
@wmwcjr,
I've made some pretty "smart" choices regarding our investments over the years, and have accumulated enough wealth to live comfortably. My favorite hobby is world travel, and have traveled to all five continents and over 190 countries. Did seven trips last year, and will be going on my fifth this year next month to Nova Scotia. Since my wife hates to travel, I have a Canadian friend who lives in Mexico to travel with. He owns a realty company down in Baja California, and tell everybody he's semi-retired. I have a travel blog you can visit at www.travelpod.com/members/c.i.222.

I've also met many interesting people during my travels, and even have friends in Cuba. I met a rocket scientist, Bob Brodsky, on a cruise to the Mexican Riviera in 2008, and we've kept in touch ever since. He started Astronautics at USC and Ohio State Universities, and also taught at other universities. He was an active lecturer until last year, and has written five books - which I have read. You can find his books on Amazon.

The reason I was elated to meet him was that when I served in the USAF in the late fifties, I worked with nuclear weapons. He's the one who designed the aerodynamics on those bombs.

Robert sent me and other old-timers an invitation who were active on ABUZZ to come to a2k when he developed it in 2002.

I've also met a2k members at meets in London, Lippstadt, Chicago, Austin, Houston, and San Francisco (I usually organize the ones in SF).

It's been a fun ride.

0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -2  
Wed 28 Aug, 2013 11:08 am
The New Face of the DemoKKKrat Party

http://newsbusters.org/sites/default/files/main_photos/2011/October/Resist%20We%20Much.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BD-fG-UCAAA3upb.jpg

http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/tee1-618x620.jpg

http://images.sodahead.com/profiles/0/0/3/2/9/6/3/5/9/race-113597089913.jpeg
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -1  
Wed 28 Aug, 2013 11:11 am
Maybe one of the resident A2K libtards could explain this "Resist We Much" thing for the rest of us...

Has Sharpton taken some sort of a part-time job with a Chinese video game company??
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -2  
Wed 28 Aug, 2013 11:12 am
http://floppingaces.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/sharpton-got-hate.jpg
JTT
 
  0  
Wed 28 Aug, 2013 11:19 am
Are all Republicans Idiots?

Republicans/Democrats, really there is no difference save for that of how the levels of stupidity are intensified. It "works" for this large group of people that have been taught to think that everything is black and white, that they are being served when "their" leaders get into power.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 12:55:52