4
   

It has suffered a change of meaning, and is now established journalese for conspicuous.

 
 
WBYeats
 
Reply Wed 8 May, 2013 02:06 am
See here: It has suffered a change of meaning, and is now established journalese for conspicuous.

Sometimes according to English idiom we can use FOR followed by an adjective.

eg I'm not sure—I can find out for definite if you like.
eg I just took it for granted that he'd always be around.

But in the above, CONSPICUOUS means easy to see or notice; likely to attract attention. Is it used in the same way?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 4 • Views: 1,684 • Replies: 25

 
View best answer, chosen by WBYeats
dalehileman
 
  3  
Reply Wed 8 May, 2013 12:20 pm
@WBYeats,
Quote:
I can find out for definite if you like
We don't say this
contrex
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 8 May, 2013 12:26 pm
@dalehileman,
dalehileman wrote:

Quote:
I can find out for definite if you like
We don't say this


We do where I come from.
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  0  
Reply Wed 8 May, 2013 12:27 pm
WBYeats, for how long are you going to post questions about Fowler?
contrex
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Wed 8 May, 2013 12:34 pm
@WBYeats,
WBYeats wrote:
Sometimes according to English idiom we can use FOR followed by an adjective.


You are misunderstanding. I see you are up to F in Fowler - ("to the fore"). Only 19 letters to go! This phrase is now, Fowler says, journalese for conspicuous. That is, it is used by journalists to mean "conspicuous". Perhaps quotes would have helped. Brown bread is Cockney slang for dead. Dingue is French slang for crazy.

Why didn't you say where you got this?




0 Replies
 
WBYeats
 
  2  
Reply Wed 8 May, 2013 06:13 pm
@contrex,
Sorry for this. But is there any rule prohibiting questions on the same author? If yes, really sorry for this, because I didn't find any rules like this....
contrex
 
  2  
Reply Thu 9 May, 2013 11:13 am
@WBYeats,
WBYeats wrote:
is there any rule prohibiting questions on the same author?


There is no rule prohibiting questions on the same author. I am saying these things because you are asking questions about old-fashioned things you have seen in Henry Watson Fowler's "Dictionary of Modern English Usage". This book is in fact anything but "modern", having been published in 1926.
WBYeats
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 May, 2013 08:28 pm
@dalehileman,
Am I correct in saying that you are an American? And you use US English?
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 May, 2013 08:25 pm
@contrex,
Contrex is right about Fowler, WB. You are much more likely to be misled by reading him than helped.
0 Replies
 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 09:54 am
@WBYeats,
Quote:
an American?
Yes
Quote:
And you use US English?
as far as I know

You have to forgive an ancient brain WB but I can't make sense out of your OP so appreciate if you could reword it; say, you're asking a little kid or a mentally incapacitated oldster (me)
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 11:02 am
@dalehileman,
Quote:
I can find out for definite if you like



Quote:
We don't say this


What about this one, Dale?

I can find out for sure if you like.
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 11:35 am
@JTT,
Quote:
What about this one, Dale? I can find out for sure if you like.
Yes very collo
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 12:07 pm
@dalehileman,
Ah, breaker one-nine, this here's the Rubber Duck. You gotta copy on me, Pig Pen, c'mon? Ah, yeah, 10-4, Pig Pen, fer shure, fer shure. By golly, it's clean clear to Flag Town, c'mon. Yeah, that's a big 10-4 there, Pig Pen, yeah, we definitely got the front door, good buddy. Mercy sakes alive, looks like we got us a convoy...
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 12:26 pm
@JTT,
Thanks JTT you've made my day

Wondering whether you composed that offhandedly or whether it required ref to a slang dictionary
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 12:28 pm
@dalehileman,
Those are some of the lyrics to Convoy by CW McCall, Dale. Doncha remember that song?
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 12:36 pm
We say "for sure". We don't say "for definite". We might say "I can find out for you definitely, if you like."
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 12:39 pm
What is supposed to be "estaqblished journalese for conspicuous"? Are you saying "conspicuous" is supposed to be a synonym of "for sure" or "for granted". It isn't.
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 02:22 pm
@MontereyJack,
Yea Jack that has me going also
0 Replies
 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 02:25 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
Doncha remember that song?
JTT Hadta Google it

http://www.lyricsfreak.com/c/cw+mccall/convoy_20026575.html
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 02:42 pm
@MontereyJack,
Who the hell are you talking to, Jack - yourself?
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » It has suffered a change of meaning, and is now established journalese for conspicuous.
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 04/29/2024 at 02:55:52