Craven de Kere wrote:I took it, not as an example of a comparable situation on the whole, but of a very good example of how financial liability does not mean one should have the right to choose someone else's medical options.
You are correct. I devised the hypothetical directly in response to
roverroad's claim that it's not fair for the woman to make the decision and expect the man to pay for it. As it happens, this type of situation happens all the time, and we typically don't have a problem with it (and, by the way,
McG, if I had made Pedestrian 50 percent responsible for her injuries, the hypothetical would not have changed at all).
In my scenario, Pedestrian chooses and Driver pays. If that's fair, why is it unfair when Mother chooses and Father pays?