Homosexual Agenda Exposed!!!!!!

A male homosexuals are the overwhelming vectors of HIV
B there is no heterosexual AIDS epidemic
C homosexual males are far more likely to be pedophiles then heterosexuals
D it is unlikely for a male or female to aquire HIV from having 500 acts of intercoruse with a serodiscrodant partner of the opposite sex.

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL: Reducing heterosexual transmission of HIV in poor countries

"Heterosexual transmission is responsible for most HIV infections in poor countries."

"As of the end of 1995, the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) estimated that some 20.1 million adults are living with HIV/AIDS, including over 11 million males and almost 9 million females. Heterosexual transmission accounts for more than 75% of all HIV infections world-wide"

"Heterosexual transmission accounts for an increasing proportion of AIDS cases in the United States. From 1985 to 1995, the proportion of U.S. AIDS cases attributed to heterosexual transmission grew from 2.5 percent to 16.7 percent." -Resource: National Institutes of Health (NIH).

"Between 75 and 85 out of every 100 HIV positive adults have been infected through unprotected sexual intercourse, with heterosexual, (male - female) intercourse accounting for over 70 cases and homosexual, (male-male) intercourse accounting for approximately 5 to 10 cases."

*All global statistics are reported from UNAIDS and WHO; all USA statistics are reported from the CDC unless otherwise noted.

Studies on who commits child sexual abuse vary in their findings, but the most common finding is that the majority of sexual offenders are family members or are otherwise known to the child. Sexual abuse by strangers is not nearly as common as sexual abuse by family members. Research further shows that men perpetrate most instances of sexual abuse, but there are cases in which women are the offenders. Despite a common myth, homosexual men are not more likely to sexually abuse children than heterosexual men are.

Some characteristics of the typical pedophile or serial child sex abuser:

-Usually an adult male.
-Often appear to be hard-working, family men.
-Tend to be better educated and more religious than the average person.
-Find ways to be alone with children; for instance, teachers or coaches who are in a position to give individual attention to students.
-Tends to be well liked by parents and children; often one of the most popular teachers in school.
-Actively seeks children who are quiet, needy, or have problems at home.
-Often photographs the victim.
-Often collects child pornography.
-Usually accomplishes molestation by gradual seduction, not coercion.
-Lavishes attention on children they don't abuse to build a sense of trust by parents and other students."

How heterosexual men get infected...
Sex on a single occasion with an infected partner can be enough to infect you, although the risk from a single act is very small - probably less than one in 200 for non-traumatic vaginal intercourse unless there is some other factor like another sex disease.

...I am merely here to expose their agenda filled with lies, counter them with a blitzkrieg of scholarly research which they will avoid and let normal people conclude what they wish.

One thing I will concede is that the gay rights movement has plagiarized liberally from the civil rights movement, when in reality, the struggles are remarkably dissimilar. As a black man, this irks me.

Its interesting , in Cravens recitations of the rules about incivility and ad hominems, hes doing it as an argument trick. just keep it fair and dont give "behavior tips" unless everyone pays attention. Including the kahoona.

IronLionZion wrote:

Craven de Kere wrote:

Dissimilar in circumstance yet very similar in that both are confronted by visceral prejudices. IMO, that similarity is profound in nature.

Indeed. But dissimilar in that one was a struggle against segregation and a history of slavery. The gay rights movement, on the other hand, is primarily a struggle to win over the acceptance of society in general and to secure some symbolic, but rather inconsequential legal rights in marriage. That, IMO, is a dissimilarity profound in nature, Please, do not even attempt to compare the stuggle against slavery and its legacy to the stuggle for Steve to wed Steve.

Forgive me for derailing the thread, but your comments here betray enormous ignorance, ILZ.

I do not challenge your right to find the gay rights movement's co-option of tactics and such from the civil rights movement irking, ILZ - because I make no claim to understand the full experience of black people in the US.

However, to dismiss the struggles of the gay movement as:

"acceptance of society in general and to secure some symbolic, but rather inconsequential legal rights in marriage. That, IMO, is a dissimilarity profound in nature, Please, do not even attempt to compare the stuggle against slavery and its legacy to the stuggle for Steve to wed Steve.

is outrageous. You should be more careful to know of what you speak before you do.

Are you unaware of the history of extreme violence against gay men (in particular men)? Of how many gay men have been, and still are, beaten up and murdered purely for their sexual orientation?

Of how much employment discrimination they have, and still do, suffer?

Of how much psychological trauma discrimination still causes? Of homosexuality as a risk factor in suicide?

Forgive me - you have only known the situation of gays in the USA over the last 20 years, where there has been some real progress - as there has been in many other western countries.

You should be more careful to know of what you speak before you do.

Are you unaware of the history of extreme violence against gay men (in particular men)? Of how many gay men have been, and still are, beaten up and murdered purely for their sexual orientation?

Of how much employment discrimination they have, and still do, suffer?

Of how much psychological trauma discrimination still causes? Of homosexuality as a risk factor in suicide?

Forgive me - you have only known the sitaution of gays in the USA over the last 20 years, where there has been some real progress - as there has been in many other western countries.

I doubt that this progress is anywhere near as profound as the surface appearance might make it seem, by the way. You only have to see the response of many otherwise sensible and decent posters here to homosexuality to see that - and of the backlash against the advances gays HAVE made that is in train as we speak.

These are just some examples...

And, acceptance is no small damned thing, by the way...

You'll have to forgive my incredulty: do you seriously think that any of the struggles quoted above - ie-occasional murders - can compare with the struggle against hundreds of years of slavery and its legacy? Thats just silly, my friend. Oh, and don't forget - black people are still occasionally mudered because of thier race in the United States. And, unlike homosexuals, we are instantly recognizable, as skin color is worn 24 hrs a day, unlike sexual preference. I could rant on.....

But we may have to agree to disagree.

She didn't say it was comparable, she said you were dismissing many elements of what gays do face, and in that regard she was spot on.

It's more than just "Steve marrying Steve" as you so facetiously put it.

Indeed, but the point was that homosexuals face more than just opposition to their ability to marry and in that regard ILZ was downplaying the discrimination they are faced with.