11
   

Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night?

 
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 11:43 am
@Glennn,
Yours is definitely not my argument, as well.
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 11:45 am
@oralloy,
You're not right. You've never been right. You're wrong. You continue to be wrong.
oralloy
 
  0  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 11:49 am
@InfraBlue,
Wrong again. I've always been right. You cannot provide any motivation for outlawing pistol grips other than the fact that progressives enjoy violating people's civil liberties.
Glennn
 
  0  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 01:47 pm
@InfraBlue,
Ah, so you do hold the indefensible and silly belief that pistol-grips and flash suppressors turn a rifle into something more than a rifle.
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 04:41 pm
@Glennn,
Your conclusion is a non sequitur.
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 04:42 pm
@oralloy,
See my previous response.
Glennn
 
  -1  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 05:20 pm
@InfraBlue,
Not taking a position on the issue of pistol-grips, flash suppressors, and other things kind of makes your contributions here nonexistent.

You remind me of a rodeo clown, trying to draw attention from the target, and really not being paid enough for the abuse you're taking.
Quote:
Features in combination make a weapon especially dangerous.
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 05:27 pm
@Glennn,
I've thoroughly explained to you and others my position on gun control that included the issue of pistol-grips, flash suppressors and other features found on assault weapons on these threads. Endlessly asking the same questions doesn't change my position.
BillRM
 
  0  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 05:28 pm
@Glennn,
Glennn wrote:

Ah, so you do hold the indefensible and silly belief that pistol-grips and flash suppressors turn a rifle into something more than a rifle.


So there is no reason for having a pistol grips on rifles? LOL
Glennn
 
  0  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 05:33 pm
@InfraBlue,
Yeah, and as I recall, you couldn't produce anything to show that pistol-grips or flash suppressors turn a rifle into something more than a rifle. How is my recollection so far?

You did say that a combination such as the one mentioned above is what you believe makes a rifle especially dangerous, or is my recollection faulty?
Glennn
 
  0  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 05:35 pm
@BillRM,
I remember you. You're one of the ones who believe that a pistol grip turns a rifle into a waaay more deadly gun. But like others in this thread, you can't produce anything to prove it.

You have this very strange idea that a little turn of the wrist when holding a rifle will give that rifle super powers.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 05:53 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
See my previous response.

Wrong again. You cannot point out anything that I've ever been wrong about. And you also cannot provide any motivation for outlawing pistol grips besides the fact that progressives enjoy violating people's civil liberties.
oralloy
 
  0  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 05:55 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
So there is no reason for having a pistol grips on rifles? LOL

Americans are free people. We do not have to provide a reason for exercising our rights.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 10:06 pm
@Glennn,
Glennn wrote:

Yeah, and as I recall, you couldn't produce anything to show that pistol-grips or flash suppressors turn a rifle into something more than a rifle. How is my recollection so far?

You did say that a combination such as the one mentioned above is what you believe makes a rifle especially dangerous, or is my recollection faulty?

Your recollection is correct in the first instance. It wasn’t, nor is it now, my intent to pursue your ridiculous straw man argument about these features turning “ a rifle into something more than a rifle.” Whatever that means. Your straw man argument is not mine.

Your recollection is also correct in the second instance.
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 10:08 pm
@oralloy,
Your wrongness continues unabated.
Glennn
 
  0  
Sat 23 Nov, 2019 10:43 pm
@InfraBlue,
Quote:
It wasn’t, nor is it now, my intent to pursue your ridiculous straw man argument about these features turning “ a rifle into something more than a rifle.”

You're not keeping up. You're not pursuing any strawman--ridiculous or otherwise--of mine. I'm pursuing a comment you made; something to the effect that a combination of such things as a pistol-grip and flash suppressor make a rifle especially dangerous. I'm asking you to explain your rationale for saying such a thing. Your response to being asked to explain your comment is to cry about some imagined strawman.

If you don't care to answer for things that you've said, then just say that, for whatever reason, you prefer to keep the answer to my questions to yourself. I'll respect your right to privacy.
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Sun 24 Nov, 2019 01:39 am
@Glennn,
Oh, I’m keeping up quite well with this straw man of yours, thank you very much. I’ve never said anything about “turning a rifle into something more than a rife.” Those are your words, not mine.

The features found on these weapons are those found on combat weapons, features implemented by the military not “because it gives the willies,” as you would have us believe, but because of their overall effectiveness.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Sun 24 Nov, 2019 06:22 am
@InfraBlue,
Come on. You're playing word games here. His phrase "something more than a rifle" and your phrase "especially dangerous" convey the same meaning.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Sun 24 Nov, 2019 06:23 am
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
Your wrongness continues unabated.

Nope. I'm not wrong about anything. You cannot provide any motivation for outlawing pistol grips other than the fact that progressives enjoy violating people's civil liberties.

You also cannot provide any evidence that any of these features make a weapon especially dangerous.
Glennn
 
  0  
Sun 24 Nov, 2019 08:42 am
@InfraBlue,
Quote:
Oh, I’m keeping up quite well with this straw man of yours

No, you are not keeping up. You have declared that a pistol-grip and flash suppressor makes a rifle especially dangerous. Asking you to explain your rationale for making such a claim is not a strawman argument. You said it, and I'm asking you to back up that claim.
Quote:
I’ve never said anything about “turning a rifle into something more than a rife.”

Yeah ya did. You said that a pistol-grip and a flash suppressor makes a rifle especially dangerous. That means you believe that a little shift of the wrist when holding a rifle does something. You're being asked to tell us what you think that something is. In other words, define the term "especially dangerous."

Same with the flash suppressor. You don't seem to understand that murders--even mass murders--committed with a rifle are done at close range. Hiding their location and intention is not anywhere on the shooter's list of priorities.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 06:49:26