3 MASKED HOME INVADERS ATTACK AND SHOOT 11 YEAR OLD BOY,
WHO TAKES HIS GUN AND RETURNS GUNFIRE,
CRITICALLY INJURING CRIMINAL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oz3VX1ZAqoA
Even after having been
shot,
the boy bravely grabbed his gun and shot back,
defending his mom and their home.
He acted like George Patton,
whose pride in the boy woud have exceeded ineffability.
Supporters of gun control woud have demanded of the boy
that he
get away from his guns (on the grounds that 11 year old boys
are
too stupid to be
ABLE to defend themselves)
and that he
ALLOW the invaders to sodomize him, to murder him
(thus avoiding complaints to police &
un-friendly testimony in court),
and to
rape and murder his mom, at their pleasure, at their discretion,
and at their convenience, but he was
un-willing to co-operate with that.
This incident shows forth the fundamental difference in principle between
the defensive freedom movement and the supporters of victim disarmament:
one is
intensely AMERICAN and the other entails a degradation of American character into
craven cowardice,
which is the innermost essence of the gun control movement, which woud prefer that the child limit his defenses
to grovelling and begging for the criminals' mercy for his mom and himself and that he abandon their fate
to the capricious
discretion of the predators.
BEHOLD the dichotomy!
What do u think of
THAT,
Rex ??
Please reveal your opinions unto us!
David