@parados,
parados wrote:When people oppose something but have no idea
what is in the thing they oppose, I consider them stupid.
I dont begrudge u your opinions of stupidity.
The section has been pointed out to me b4,
but I dont remember it, offhand. It matters not.
I need not concern myself to autopsy the treaty.
Its death is sufficiently satisfying.
I support
laissez faire free enterprize,
not government interference.
Merely by looking at the source of the treaty
and by whom it is advocated, I know to oppose it; bad people.
As a general rule of thum:
u cant go rong by opposing
anything that IANSA likes.
parados wrote:The actual text of the treaty is only a few pages. It lists the things a state is supposed to do for import, export and transit through their country. I am just wondering where you can possibly think it applies to purchases in the US.
Only a complete idiot would think it does.
What do idiots think, if thay r incomplete??
parados wrote:That says something about those Senators and Congressman that oppose it for some unknown reason.
They, like you David, seem to be easily led around by the nose.
U think so, huh ?
parados wrote:One of the stated purposes of the treaty is to prevent arms shipments to terrorists.
Can we state that your opposition shows you support selling guns to terrorists?
Everyone shud have guns, the same as food.
Thay have been made by hand, b4 electricity was available.
Everyone who wants them enuf
WILL succeed in having them.
I am neutral qua selling them guns. Thay r not getting mine.
Intolerable threats shud be
BANISHED and removed from this Continent.
Thay can pack their guns b4 thay leave.
David