@firefly,
Quote:A coffee house, where people go to eat, and relax, and chat with acquaintances and other regulars, really wouldn't welcome intruders, who wander in off the street, plop themselves down at occupied tables, begin loudly ranting about social issues, and insisting that the other patrons not only listen to them, but also respond to them, and who then hurl insults at other patrons when they feel ignored. It's simply inappropriate and disruptive social behavior that won't be tolerated in a real coffee house, or in our virtual café. In a real coffee house, such a person would be asked to leave. In our virtual eatery, ignoring may be the best we can do.
Defining the specifications of a "coffee-house" and then whinging about them not being met ignores itself because it is meaningless. When that idiocy is compounded by defining what is "inappropriate" and what is "disruptive" there is a sense of spouting for spouting's sake. Tailoring the environs to suit does not apply to public areas. There are PMs to facilitate that sort of thing.
Quote:You also tend to throw a hissy fit when you feel your comments are ignored or not responded to.
That's fm's standard trick. I am not bothered who ignores me. I only complain about people in a debate ignoring some of the debaters and remaining in the debate. If a few people were debating gun control, say, it would not be a debate at all if parties were refusing to listen to other arguments at the table. That is not, emphatically not, how we do business in the western world. All opinion becomes set in stone. It is a well known weakness in a leader to refuse to listen to bad news. Some, citing Mrs Thatcher, claim it is a strength but if a couple of bomb timers had not malfunctioned in the South Atlantic Great Britain would have received a blow from which it might never recover.
There is no way anybody here can rant louder than anyone else. If length of post is the standard then you are "up there" ff at ranting. "Ranting" is just another version of ADD. Stick the stiletto in first. Trying to persuade people that I am ranting, and you are not, simply with word magic. Do you do thunderbolts when you get really raging? No wonder the NRA is going strong.
It's time for my fun evening soakie-soakies but I might return to the rest of your rant (a meaningless exercise of the finger chords) if there's any useful point to be made out of it. And I have defined "useful" already in the first paragraph if we can take it that the proper method of debate in our world has led to us having these facilities which we can be presumed to approve of. Which might not be true in the future I'll admit.
Without such facilities fm would have had to construct a curragh in the traditional manner and flights from NY to SF would be on the back of a pterodactyl with short hops. So I feel justified in saying "useful".
And there's the Willendorf Venus to consider as well. And somebody had considered her very carefully in order to produce that beautiful figurine. That guy didn't have ADD. I have wondered whether he hired it out to other hunters on long trips to find the food to keep her in good trim. Neolithic foreplay it is not an exaggeration to say.