@farmerman,
Quote:You seem to get all excited and annoyed at other peoples lives.
I'm neither excited nor annoyed old boy. It's my sympathy for those who have to listen to the sort of stuff I commented on which motivates me. I feel, perhaps over-optimistically, that if I could cure you of this habit you have of referring to matters in a manner which implies your familiarity with them without you providing any evidence of it--the coffee-table book syndrome-- it would improve their lives no end and I am in favour of improving peoples lives and even those of cyber strangers.
It isn't very nice to remind listeners of their inferiority to your goodself because they are unable to gush at the prospect of perusing the latest science news and especially when there is no evidence that perusing the latest science news is not being pursued for perusing the latest science news' sake. The science being irrelevant.
If I am to be mortified at my scientific ignorance, as I am quite prepared to be, I expect it to be justified rather than having assertions standing in lieu. We do not even know whether you buy the rags or even that you read them let alone understand their contents.
What little I know about up-to-date science informs me that writers of the sort of higgle-de-piggly hotch-potch of indignant incoherence as you are wont to engage our sensibilities with are profoundly ill-equipped to deal with any minute corner of science, circa 1500 AD, when it was viewed with the gravest suspicion because it was felt that it might,in time, destroy the whole world, despite the temporary conveniences it promised, if not properly managed. Or comes as near to destroying the whole world as makes no difference to guzzling cardinals in the luxuries of their free accommodations.
Quote:I for one, am tired of your run-on, loosely linked, name dropping prose, jam packed with all the vapidity Ive come to expect from only you
Then why did you "bump" one of my posts?
Creativity cannot be altered. One has to make do with what one has of it and of the opportunities afforded for its exercise. Sometimes the opportunities are such, as with the materials art shops provide, to cover for its shortcomings which, of course, they never can. At other times the opportunities are limited, as with the cave painters, but that can't cover the fact that they were great artists.
If you will provide an example of the sort of creativity you approve of it might help me to see where I am going wrong. You might also provide an example of the latest science news. We can't discuss that you are reading it for all that long.
I can easily outdo my usual style but I fear to draw the ire of members here.
WAHT. Waits at hungry tables?