@farmerman,
What is actually required, fm, rather than such self-serving spiels as that tripe is, is that you play the games and we will judge what is what from your performance.
Why are the submissions on the A thread "cute but lightweight"? Can anything ff and vonny do be lightweight? Can anything cute be lightweight?
And the gifted wits in the A game, who are not being tested by some in-house fiddle, possibly less crude than the one in Louisiana, which raises self-esteem where it is undeserved, put forth evidence that they don't just swan it on the sidelines swatting at what are asserted to be sitting ducks.
If it is as easy as you say why don't you give it a go or keep your gob shut? It is for other gamesters to decide how easy you find the construction of acronyms after you have applied the method you recommend.
Quote:Spenid is overly impressed as how a word will "morph" into another in just a few steps.
There you go again. It's a really bad habit to be making self-validating assertions all the time. I am impressed by a player consistently showing signs of having thought about their choice of a word. I can "morph" words all day long. "Oprah" for example. She morphed out of Mrs Norris types.
I am not in the least surprised at the road links in the UK. I have been a cog in the machine that provides them. I'm schizophrenic on whether I approve.
Imagine, if it is possible, Henry James, Jane Austen, Frank Harris, Mae West, Bob Dylan, Germaine Greer, Henry Miller and Thorstein Veblen playing the A game. That would be fun.
Take the tone to be "men are like carrots: cheap and plentiful and easily cooked" and do COMICAL for us.