@Lola,
I have been wondering, Lola, if we could interest those of the clientele who have avoided the experience in playing on the Trivia word games. It might attract new customers here. And vonny plays. And firefly. And you and I. And Beth. And George. McTag I think.
I know that one or two here are contemptuous of the word games. The real curmudgeons. They have so expressed themselves in the past. Quite pompously too. That can only be because they are unsure of their capacity to amuse or that they think gamesters merely juggle letters about like 5 year-olds could do. It's due to a well known syndrome called Underestimatingeverybodiesintelligenceitis.
Only today there was a sequence on the 4-letter game; trick--stick--kicks--licks--skill--likes--links--liken--blink--clink, which is where we are now. That was quite amusing. I won't say which were whose to spare any blushes. And all deniable. Anybody accusing someone of going too far can easily be charged with reading too much into things and of having questionable taste for doing so. Obviously it is sometimes necessary to just juggle the letters simply to keep the game moving.
And the Acronym Game, which firefly and myself have been monopolising recently can be very amusing. Yinyangery with style. One might easily use two, or even three, if one fancies being a bit
risque, first names of ladies and gentlemen and the rest of the letters to set them in motion. That's what fiction writers do. They invent characters and set them in motion. ACRONYMS, my way, are greased-lightning fiction concerning the oldest and by far the most sturdy theme of literature. (After coming round on Norman's Y-fronts Mary sneezed--for example.) The
genre has limitless possibilities.
I commend this motion to the House.