@farmerman,
If you will allow me to say so , fm, the arguments with which you have supported the extraordinary effect the extraordinary work of the Watts Chapel has had upon your sense of artistic pride are as frivolous as the assertion that the Watts Chapel is an extraordinary work ( whatever that might mean) outside of the notion, also quite frivolous, that your appreciation declares to the world the excellence of your aesthetic judgment by dint of you having declared the work "extraordinary", and by one swift hop, a skip and a jump being unnecessary to such a task, speaks commendably of your personal qualities to those sensibilities which are habituated to using the same cheapskate trick themselves.
Your prose, on top of being dire and lacking style, is overburdened with hints, nods, winks,nudges, allusions, tip-offs, scents, pointers, signs, aids, suspicions, inferences, omens, advice, innuendos, announcements and fleas-in the ears to help us all orient our approval of the excellence of your person. You do art because it is posh to do art. The only problem is that what you do is not art. Not in any way shape or form and can only possibly be construed to be art by those who wish to be thought posh, or at least superior to wankers like me, and shops selling the paintbrushes and the usual paraphernalia are ideal vehicles to their purpose.
I think about the horses that carted the bricks up the hill to where the chapel is sited. Siting it next to the brickworks would not, I think, detract from the glorification of God.
When you visit you must, simply must, tell us where "Kilroy was here" is written within the sacred precincts.