georgeob1 wrote:I believe many on the right would say the same thing about modern PC revisionist history - and with about as much reason and fantasy as their critics.
One difference here is that in the context of this thread, Setanta is referring to a very specific (and quite vivid) example - namely, the article this thread is about. Whereas your reference to "modern PC revisionist history", even if it does represent a pars pro toto for what, when fully eleborated, would probably constitute a valid enough point of its own, as it is stands as a kind of blanket, abstract putdown.
I've come to really dislike any of that pattern in which, when something specifically wrong is pointed out on one end of the political spectrum, those veering that way respond with a generalised, "well, but on your side you have stuff like that too/worse".