Why There Cannot Be Peace Between Israel and the Palestinians

So-called "targeting" is a baseless assertion.

The preamble of the mandate document declared:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.[27]

We also have extremist Americans in our government. What are you trying to tell us?

What a big lie. Israel doesn't discriminate or oppress its Palestinian citizens.

Nonsense. Economic discrtimination is widespread even for Palestinian citizens of Israel. They earn less money for the same or similar jobs and their ability to serve in government jobs is severely limited. As for the Palestinian citizens of the territory that Israel has illegally occupied since the 1967 war, they have virtually no civil or property rights, and very little economic opportunity. Their property is taken from them by various scams by Israeli settlers ; their right to movement around even the West Bank is severely limited and subject to unannounced checkpoints and inspections by the IDF ; they have no rights to representation in the Israeli government which controls their access to the outside world, water, energy and telecommunications. The former Christian populatiuon of Palestine has been pushed aside and is now about 25% of what it was in 1945.

I don't waste time what their responses are, because I already have an idea what "you'll" say.

I personally think that most of us do not see the injustice that we do to our own love ones by the actions that we indirectly impose on them. This could possibly include your own mother, father, brother, sister and so forth. I think that we all have a limited ethical radius and we are also able exclude our own love ones by rationalization.

I personally think that most of us do not see the injustice that we do to our own love ones by the actions that we indirectly impose on them. This could possibly include your own mother, father, brother, sister and so forth. I think that we all have a limited ethical radius and we are also able exclude our own love ones by rationalization.

Example If we were to go back ten thousand years we might find that who ever was the most physically fit was able to be at an advantage and dominate over those who were not but over time the intellectually advanced were able to move ahead of them. My question is how is it any different for the physically advanced among us to take advantage of the weaker than it is for the intellectually advanced to take advantage of the intellectually challenged? Just because you may more witted or some how positioned by luck how could it be morally possible for you to earn in a day what your own mother may earn in a year?

More importantly though your implicit assumption that anyones success must necessarily rest on the exploitation ("taking advantage of")

Reality?

rl's postings are based on "I'm not sure of anything" even after providing irrefutable evidence. He's on my Ignore list of people who can't make up his mind on most subjects; too wishy-washy for any meaningful discussion.