JPB
 
  2  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 03:37 pm
@hawkeye10,
No, it's not irrelevant. Now the House Rs can vote for a tax cut and pass the smell test. Why do you think Boehner couldn't get $1M through his caucus?
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 03:39 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
...who takes credit for suggesting it does not matter.


You are talking about a fictional world here?????
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 03:41 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:

Quote:
...who takes credit for suggesting it does not matter.


You are talking about a fictional world here?????


in the real world people care less and less about these skirmishes between the D's and the R's. they both suck.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 03:43 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
...then we will have to get an agreement on how much government to have...


The more the better. I sure as hell do not want the corporations in charge completely. They probably will stay in charge considering how we have allowed capitalism to become corrupted...but at least with the middleman of government, there is some hope for the little guy and gal.



Quote:
... and where to start to make the massive cuts which are unavoidable...


They are not only avoidable...I would be willing to bet big bucks they will NEVER be made.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 03:43 pm
@JPB,
JPB wrote:

No, it's not irrelevant. Now the House Rs can vote for a tax cut and pass the smell test. Why do you think Boehner couldn't get $1M through his caucus?

because he lacks the use of power skills to get it done. nobody fears him, which makes him useless.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 03:45 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Re: Frank Apisa (Post 5213597)
Frank Apisa wrote:

Quote:
...who takes credit for suggesting it does not matter.


You are talking about a fictional world here?????


in the real world people care less and less about these skirmishes between the D's and the R's. they both suck.


Could be. But "in the real world" people keep returning the same people to power...and if you truly think it does not matter who gets the credit for stuff, you just are not looking at the situation realistically.

I does matter, Hawkeye. I kinda hope that could change, but I'd sooner hope that all the rich people in the world would give up their wealth and allow everyone to have sufficient.
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 03:47 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Quote:
Re: JPB (Post 5213594)
JPB wrote:

No, it's not irrelevant. Now the House Rs can vote for a tax cut and pass the smell test. Why do you think Boehner couldn't get $1M through his caucus?

because he lacks the use of power skills to get it done. nobody fears him, which makes him useless.


I'm not picking a fight with you, Hawk, but the issue is much, much, much more complicated than you are portraying it.

Boehner is a jerk, but he is trying to nail tapioca to the ceiling with these guys. The crazies have taken over the asylum in the Republican Party.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 03:50 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Could be. But "in the real world" people keep returning the same people to power...and if you truly think it does not matter who gets the credit for stuff, you just are not looking at the situation realistically.


you are blowing this image that I have of you being a smart guy....once we decide that all parties are incompetent and/or corrupted who takes credit and who sells their story the best no longer matters. we dont care. this is where we are rapidly getting with the Washington elite.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 03:51 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
The crazies have taken over the asylum in the Republican Party.

which is proof of Boehner's incompetence....
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 03:58 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Quote:
Re: Frank Apisa (Post 5213609)
Quote:
Could be. But "in the real world" people keep returning the same people to power...and if you truly think it does not matter who gets the credit for stuff, you just are not looking at the situation realistically.


you are blowing this image that I have of you being a smart guy....once we decide that all parties are incompetent and/or corrupted who takes credit and who sells their story the best no longer matters. we dont care. this is where we are rapidly getting with the Washington elite.


Sorry about that, but nothing I am saying should indicate stupidity or lack of intelligence in me.

Nothing is "rapidly" changing in Washington...or in the electorate. Look at the results of the last election. Credit matters...if it didn't, these legislators wouldn't give it two minutes of their time. They are NOT STUPID. They covet the credit for a reason...and the reason is that it truly matters here in the real world.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 04:00 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Quote:
Re: Frank Apisa (Post 5213613)
Quote:
The crazies have taken over the asylum in the Republican Party.

which is proof of Boehner's incompetence....


Like I said...I consider him a jerk. But in my estimation, you are selling him short. Nobody could make a silk purse out of the sow's ear the Republican Party has become. It is a mess...totally ungovernable...totally out of control...

...and daring to say they have the answers for the problems that face us!
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 04:02 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Nothing is "rapidly" changing in Washington...or in the electorate. Look at the results of the last election. Credit matters...if it didn't, these legislators wouldn't give it two minutes of their time. They are NOT STUPID.

through history leaders have very often lost touch with the masses, and it has happened again. they will either reform or they will get decapitated.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 04:03 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
The fiscal cliff cometh. And, whether or not the House and Senate — with an assist from the White House — figure out some sort of stopgap(ish) way to avert going over the edge, one lesson is already crystal clear: Congress has failed

Don’t believe us? Consider the following:
* Both sides put off any discussion of addressing the country’s looming financial crisis until after the 2012 election, which was cast as the peoples’ chance to let their voices be heard as to what direction they wanted their politicians to head. President Obama won with 332 electoral votes, Democrats surprisingly kept the Senate and not so surprisingly picked up a handful of seats in the House. And yet, here we are.
* Given that the country is headed over the cliff in a day or so — triggering a series of automatic cuts across the government — the logistical and political hurdles to any sort of grand bargain to address the country’s long-term debt and spending issues are insurmountably high. That means that any deal will be decidedly narrow in nature in order to pass it through the political and legislative gantlet that is a narrowly Democratic-controlled Senate and a Republican-controlled House. And if Congress can’t even find common ground on a small-bore deal, what does that say about its chances of cutting a big deal down the line?
* We’ve been here before. This will be the second time in less than 18 months that Congress — and specifically House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) — tried to find a way to solve the “big” problem of the country’s growing debt burden. And even if a deal is made, it will be the second time (the debt ceiling was the first) that will ultimately be defined not by whether a deal is made or even what the deal looks like but rather by the legislative ugliness — there is no kinder word — that led to the “compromise.”
Seen through that lens, what happens between now and when the clock strikes midnight tonight won’t really matter all that much. The die is cast. For the average person, Congress’s using every second — literally — of its allotted time (and maybe more than its allotted time) to find a deal will be chalked up as another in a series of failures by Washington.
And if the fallout for Congress is anything like what we saw in the wake of the debt-ceiling debacle, you can expect what has already been a dismal run in terms of the institution’s political popularity to get even worse.
West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin (D) hit it on the head Sunday when he took to the Senate floor to lambaste his colleagues for their failure to act. “It is absolutely inexcusable that all of us find ourselves in this place at this time … with no plan and no apparent hope,” said Manchin.
No matter what happens in these final hours, Manchin’s sentiment seems certain to mirror the American public’s view of Congress and the fiscal cliff. Failure seems not to be an option but the only one.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/12/31/how-congress-has-already-failed-on-the-fiscal-cliff/?hpid=z2
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 04:18 pm
@JPB,
Don't you think JP that as the science of psephology becomes more and more refined the emergence of the one party state is a natural outcome.

And "reaching across the aisle" is a bit one party stuff imo.

We have a coalition government between two parties which slugged out a fierce slagging off match before the election and now they sit side by side on the Front Bench smirking sheepishly.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 04:23 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
...who takes credit for suggesting it does not matter.


I did Frank. Long ago. But there's no credit for it as it is so bloody obvious.

It's a rigged cliffhanger to keep your eyes glued to the TV screen so that you don't miss the ads and the protagonists get more opportunities to exhibit themselves.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 04:27 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
It's a rigged cliffhanger to keep your eyes glued to the TV screen so that you don't miss the ads and the protagonists get more opportunities to exhibit themselves.
the fights are rigged to divert attention from the fact that the work is not getting done in Washington......there is no leadership forthcoming from our alleged leaders.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 04:48 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Which leader do you blame most for not having a deal yet on the "fiscal cliff?"


The president (41024) 50%


Rep. John Boehner (27274) 33%


Rep. Nancy Pelosi (2261) 3%


Sen. Mitch McConnell (4729) 6%


Sen. Harry Reid (7421) 8%


http://finance.yahoo.com/

INCONCEIVABLE!
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 04:55 pm
@hawkeye10,
I think it's a combination of this and what Frank was talking about earlier with the Republican House. Boehner made it clear that he couldn't get the votes for a tax increase for ANYONE out of his caucus. Grover was flapping his lips in the background saying to go ahead because they were going to nail Obama's ass later. I don't think there's going to be a vote today but Biden is supposedly on his way to meet with the Senate Ds. The Senate progressives and the CCCP supposedly "hate" the deal.

Word coming out of the Republican caucus meetings is that the Rs in the house are "pissed".
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 05:21 pm
@JPB,
ya, everyone is pissed over a plan that accomplishes like 30% of the mission.

ho-hum......we need to tell these boys to stop their sniveling and to get ur done.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 05:33 pm
House adjourns until noon tomorrow.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Fiscal Cliff
  3. » Page 38
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/29/2024 at 03:44:19