@JPB,
YES.
I was talking about that a lot before the election, and have been having the same thoughts since.
I was just thinking about the Karl Rove/ Dick Morris implosion and whether it means anything.
The Karl Rove thing was just too perfect. "Math that Republicans use to make themselves feel better." Running right smack into reality. (Just in case anyone is not aware of this -- Karl Rove was in front of the cameras on Fox saying that the numbers guys at Fox shouldn't have called Ohio for Obama. Megyn Kelly had to go back and interview them and they were like, um, this is what the numbers say. We're confident.)
I see some people here parroting Fox talking points and I really want to say, have you learned nothing? These people (Rove, Morris et al) are completely out of touch with reality.
They made concrete predictions, confidently, that were tested and turned out to be WRONG. Really wrong.
I do think there is something seriously dangerous about the bubble, and how it allows people to think they're getting actual news when it's just plain not. It's propaganda.
This is on both sides of course, though Fox is a particular offender.
I was reading something that I'm not sure I remember enough of to find back, about rules about what can be shown on TV changing in (the late 80's?), giving rise to the partisan "news" shows. It's a relatively recent development, and I think it's really dangerous. Before that, a news show was not allowed to show bias (something like this), it had to be reasonably perceived as neutral.
Of course that's a whole other problem with the current climate -- since Fox et al somehow have some actual credibility, they are able to claim that something fact-based is "biased," and so nonsense enters the discourse that way as relatively neutral news sources don't want to piss off the Fox bloc and so publish nonsense in the interest of being fair and balanced, when nonsense has no business being published.