@cicerone imposter,
Cis you'll have to forgive an old fart who initially tries to understand by literal interpretation
I presume Cis you mean that you don't believe they exist. Okay, if by "gods" you mean those of the conventional sort, let's make that assumption for the sake of argument
That is, that they don't
Quote:it's all in the individual's perception that such a "thing" exists.
I'm not sure by "thing" you refer to gods or freewill; but you've already stipulated to the former, so you must mean the latter
But now let's discuss "that", its implication being that freewill indeed exists because otherwise you would have said, eg, "whether"
Quote:gods cannot confer free will;
Yes, well, obviously, if they don't exist they cannot confer
Quote:it's all nature of our chemistry/biology and environment.
Not sure what you mean by "it's", whether the Universe, belief in gods, or freewill. But yes, chem/bio/env certainly do figure into any discussion of freewill and the Universe, if not gods
But how exactly
Quote:Since man is now able to send earthly materials to Mars, where does free will for man end?
Forgive me Cis but I can't understand how our ability to visit Mars figures into the discussion
However I suppose you're asking, if freewill is a legitimate concept, under what conditions does it lose its power, and I can only reply: Under trying circumstances
Returning to your first assertion, though, and here allow me to switch into my own mode of pereception: The apodictical existential pantheist agrees that yes, no, it's all in our heads, to the extent that whether or not She exists depends on how one defines Her
However I can't see how any of the above addresses the question whether She can confer freewill
Phil, Tom, Frank, Craig, help, we're lost in the semantical aspect of it all