@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
Quote: New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Friday that despite his own support of same-sex marriage, he disagrees with some of his fellow mayors who have said that the fast-food chain Chick-fil-A is not welcome in their cities because of its opposition to gay marriage.
Bloomberg said on his weekly radio show on WOR that it is inappropriate for a government entity “to look at somebody’s political views and decide whether or not they can live in the city, or operate a business in the city, or work for somebody in the city.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/nyc-mayor-disagrees-with-mayors-of-boston-chicago-san-francisco-in-chick-fil-a-debate/2012/07/27/gJQAtPMuDX_story.html
Bloomberg is an ass, but he is right here.
Quote:Bloomberg said Menino, Emanuel and Lee are “really are good mayors” but “trampling on the freedom to marry whoever you want is exactly the same as trampling on your freedom to open a store.”
Richard Socarides, a New York lawyer and former Clinton White House adviser on gay rights who is urging a boycott of Chick-fil-A, said Bloomberg is right.
“Consumers can disagree with a company’s corporate political position and decide not to spend money there,” Socarides said. “But the city cannot regulate speech by denying someone a permit to operate their business just because
You CI seem to be very challenged here on figuring right from wrong.
I must say that when government was created,
it seems very
unlikely that
AUTHORITY was granted
to keep out of town anyone whose opinion
does not co-incide with its mayor.
If a different mayor gets elected,
then does
HE also have the authority
to
turn it around the other way, if he wants,
and get rid of commercial entities that disagree with
HIM ?
Shud businessmen who choose to approach the city
need to fill out questionairs exposing their social, political n economic opinions ?
Does jurisdiction exist for that ?
I support the freedom of homosexuals to marry.
David