Romney 2012?

Noonan Slams Romney Campaign as ‘Incompetent, Small and Tinny’

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/noonan-romney-campaign-incompetent/2012/09/19/id/456727

1 Reply

@Thomas,

I'm not finger pointing, simply pointing out the double standard.

1 Reply

@snood,

snood wrote:

Noonan Slams Romney Campaign as ‘Incompetent, Small and Tinny’

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/noonan-romney-campaign-incompetent/2012/09/19/id/456727

And we know just how much you love and admire Peggy Noonan.

She voted for Obama in 2008.

No conservative gives her the time of day.

2 Replies

@engineer,

I do not believe, nor have I ever said, that Romney has a "magic solution" to anything. To be honest, I trust him about as far as I can throw him.

By the same token, I don't trust Obama to be able to solve the problem either.

IMHO, the big difference between Obama and Romney is that with Romney he admits he is gonna stab you in the back, and with Obama you know its coming but you just don't know when.

1 Reply

@snood,

Just fine I am

How are you liking your guy (assuming you've an open mind to any of the things the MSM won't tell you)?

0 Replies

This is interesting.
Apparently the tape of Romney mentioning the 47% has been doctored and is missing at least 1 minute, maybe more.
That being the case, the recording must be declared suspect and discounted.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/09/oops_turns_out_romney_47_tape_was_doctored.html

3 Replies

@mysteryman,

He he. You're a comedian.

1 Reply

@edgarblythe,

I'm not being funny. If the tape has missing portions or has otherwise been doctored, then it has to be considered suspect.
And if it is suspect, how can you, me, or anyone else trust it to be accurate?
Or are you saying you are willing to believe a recording that has been altered or is missing portions, as long as that tape makes someone you don't like look bad?

5 Replies

@mysteryman,

You wrote,

Quote:

...he is gonna stab you in the back, and with Obama you know its coming but you just don't know when.

So, what might those back stabs be? Please be specific.

0 Replies

@mysteryman,

There is no way to decorate those words to say other than what they said. If there was, Romney would have come out with it by now.

1 Reply

@edgarblythe,

He tried; he said he supports 100% of the people.

Too late; he's too stupid to understand anything political.

0 Replies

@mysteryman,

mysteryman wrote:

I'm not being funny. If the tape has missing portions or has otherwise been doctored, then it has to be considered suspect.
And if it is suspect, how can you, me, or anyone else trust it to be accurate?
Or are you saying you are willing to believe a recording that has been altered or is missing portions, as long as that tape makes someone you don't like look bad?

The unedited tape has now been released and Romney is owning it. If your belief is that Romney really didn't say that, you might as well give that up now.

1 Reply

@mysteryman,

One can tell what was altered or is missing. The tape may have been started and stopped. That doesn't mean the part that is NOT missing anything is not accurate.

0 Replies

@mysteryman,

mysteryman wrote:

I'm not finger pointing,

mysteryman wrote:

simply pointing

Er... what appendage are you using to point with, then?

<snork>

0 Replies

@mysteryman,

mysteryman wrote:

Apparently the tape of Romney mentioning the 47% has been doctored and is missing at least 1 minute, maybe more.
That being the case, the recording must be declared suspect and discounted.

"Must be"? Really?

The part where he actually says it is completely intact, with no gaps or skips, so it seems pretty complete to me.

This from the "you didn't build that" camp....

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

A Note on Romney’s Arrogant and Stupid Remarks

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/note-romney-s-arrogant-and-stupid-remarks_652548.html

0 Replies

@engineer,

mm still believes the most credible media companies are going to post something like this one without first making sure it's complete and unedited.

There's no .......

0 Replies

@mysteryman,

awesome

so there's more stupid stuff to hear from Romney

can't wait

I wonder what little tidbit is being saved for a truly inauspicious moment for the Republicans

1 Reply

@mysteryman,

You might want to pay attention to what Mr. Romney has said about what's been released (not his idiot campaign - Mr. Romney). He doesn't deny anything on the tape that's been released so far - just comments that it was mmmmmmmmm inelegant.

Romney is not discounting what was released so far.

1 Reply

@ehBeth,

Here's Ryan's response,

Quote:

Mitt Romney's running mate is calling the Republican presidential nominee "obviously inarticulate"

Ryan's understanding of the English language seems lacking; almost everybody that heard it understood what he said. Romney articulated his true feelings very well.

0 Replies

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know