0
   

Kerry v Bush: The Facts, the Campaigns and the Spin...

 
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 04:03 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
Larry434:

I've heard much worse already here. But let's be clear; I do NOT celebrate what is taking place in Iraq, despite the fact that you argue to the contrary.

I find that statement MUCH more insulting than you misguided fool.

I find it morally offensive.


Then quit gloating over every successful terrorist attack on Iraqi civilians that you think you can blame on Bush.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 04:04 pm
I haven't seen Dookie "gloating" over anyone's death. I think that's in the eye of the beholder.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 04:05 pm
Correction:

Morally repugnant!
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 04:06 pm
nimh wrote:
I haven't seen Dookie "gloating" over anyone's death. I think that's in the eye of the beholder.


Yes it is, nimh. I guess I am reacting to the gratuitous personal slur. I am done with it now tho. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 04:11 pm
Larry434:

Perhaps if you ceased with such baseless and disgusting accusations as your last one, we can let bygones be bygones.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 04:18 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
Larry434:

Perhaps if you ceased with such baseless and disgusting accusations as your last one, we can let bygones be bygones.


Perhaps. I shall see if you change your tone when discussing terrorist attacks in Iraq or elsewhere.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 04:19 pm
As shall I.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 04:21 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
As shall I.


Deal!
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Oct, 2004 04:35 pm
Jonathan Cohn on last night's debate:

Quote:
Here was one typical exchange:

---
KERRY: The president just said the FBI changed its culture. We just read on the front pages of America's papers that there are over a hundred-thousand hours of tapes unlistened to. On one of those tapes may be the enemy being right the next time. And the test is not whether you're spending more money. The test is are you doing everything possible to make America safe. We didn't need that tax cut. America needed to be safe.

BUSH: Of course we're doing everything we can to protect America. I wake up every day thinking about how best to protect America. That's my job. I work with Director Mueller of the FBI He comes into my office when I'm in Washington every morning talking about how to protect us. There's a lot of really good people working hard to do so. It's hard work. But again I want to tell the American people: We're doing everything we can at home, but you better have a president who chases these terrorists down and brings them to justice before they hurt us again.
---

That's pretty much the way it went all night: Kerry citing specific evidence that Bush was not keeping America safe, Bush coming back with vague boasts about his good intentions and all the "hard work" being done, then changing the subject by suggesting he would pursue terrorists while Kerry would just let them roam free.

But then that's pretty much the way it's gone for this entire campaign. Over and over again, Kerry has tried to talk specifics; over and over again, Bush has responded by ignoring the questions, boasting about his mettle, and attacking Kerry's character.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Oct, 2004 05:18 pm
And that's why a likely majority of us are supporting Bush. He doesn't pretend to be something or somebody he is not. He doesn't try to wow anybody with grandiose words that don't meanign anything. He stays on message. He is in my corner re national security, the war on terrorism, integrity of the courts, and providing a leadership of decency. For those reasons I'll vote for him and don't much care about his positions on all the rest that Congress will be in charge of anyway.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Oct, 2004 06:38 am
Post-debate anti-spin:

MSNBC: misleading remarks in debate

FoxNews: Debate Fact Check

FoxNews: VP's Claim About Meeting Edwards Debunked

Quote:
"The vice president said that the first time I met Senator Edwards was tonight when we walked on the stage. I guess he forgot the time we sat next to each other for a couple hours about three years ago. I guess he forgot the time we met at the swearing in of another senator. So, my wife Elizabeth reminded him on the stage," Edwards said as the crowd roared.

According to Edwards staff, Cheney replied, "Oh, yeah."


The fact check pages focus on Cheney's assertion that "I have not suggested there's a connection between Iraq and 9/11." MSNBC's leads with it and has four separate quotes from 2001-2003 in which Cheney does assert such a link. Fox has it further down its page and has one.

They also mention Cheney's reference to Saddam Hussein having "an established relationship with al Qaeda" and "a 10-year relationship". MSNBC points out that Tenet merely cited "high-level contacts" over a 10-year period, which however "never led to any cooperative activity". FoxNews writes that "contacts were limited and sketchy", and "did not amount to state sponsorship of Al Qaeda".

They deal with Cheney's erroneous statement that this was the first time he met Edwards, "perhaps the most awkward blooper of the evening" according to FoxNews - see above.

MSNBC tackles Edwards' false claim that the war in Iraq has cost $200 billion "and counting", though that is what the cost of the warreduce and forgive Iraqi debt to the tune of nearly $80 billion." But MSNBC notes that "while there are reports of some sort of agreement, no plan has been made public".

On Cheney's statement that the US has only taken 50% of the casualties in Iraq if you include Iraqi security forces, MSNBC notes that the US "does not keep track of Iraqi casualties", and that one senior U.S. official's estimation that 750 Iraqi policemen have been killed compares to 1,061 US deaths.

Fox takes on Edwards for saying American troops were sent into Iraq "without the body armor they needed," a comment that "might suggest they had no body armor at all, when in fact they did" - just not "the brand new, improved armor".

(Question of how you define "needed", I guess - I read a harrowing report from an imbed who described how several soldiers in his unit were killed because the vehicles they had to patrol in had no armored plating above chest-level - there are vehicles that do, just not enough of 'em. The unit did get them - but too late for those who by then had died ...)

Edwards was wrong when he said that "millionaires sitting by their swimming pool" pay a lower tax rate than the men and women who serve in Iraq, MSNBC notes. Most soldiers do however pay the same rate as that which applies to dividends, though they pay a much lower effective rate after deductions.

Both MSNBC and Fox, further down the page, point out how Cheney engaged in the tax fallacy again, accusing Kerry of "voting for taxes 98 times1.6 million private-sector jobs have been lost," when "the actual number is close to 900,000".

Finally, it remarks on how Cheney "charged that Kerry and Edwards oppose the No Child Left Behind education law", when "both senators voted for the law and support some modifications and billions of dollars to fully fund the education program."
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Oct, 2004 09:32 am
"Finally, it remarks on how Cheney "charged that Kerry and Edwards oppose the No Child Left Behind education law", when "both senators voted for the law and support some modifications and billions of dollars to fully fund the education program."

This is another area where Edwards could have made some points, but he blew it big time. Because of the underfunding of "leave no child behind," many schools have been closed. That Cheney made the claim that minority students are doing better is fine, but how does that level with closed schools? Many California school districts are now considering four day school weeks. Leave no child behind have not been fully funded, and the federal mandates are creating havoc for our schools.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Oct, 2004 09:56 am
Yes, that was one where I was swearing at him to jump on it... "UNDERFUNDED!!!" He did get around to it, I believe, but not very oomphily.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Oct, 2004 10:30 am
It's really, really, hard work.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v97/imposter222/itshardwork.jpg
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Oct, 2004 10:41 am
I wish Cheney had jumped on the underfunded thing too. The Bush administration had to order numerous school districts across the country to spend or return millions in unspent federal education money and at least one state, Oregon, returned several hundred thousand of unspent funding. Doesn't sound like it was all that underfunded does it?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Oct, 2004 10:42 am
Sure it does.

Just because the Feds sent gobs of money to the wrong place for the wrong things doesn't mean there was ample money to go around in the states that needed it, doesn't mean that any of that money that was given back was doled out to those who needed it more, doesn't mean the plan was put together well in the first place.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Oct, 2004 10:44 am
Cites/ source, Fox?

While I go find info that says otherwise...
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Oct, 2004 10:46 am
Doesn't mean it wasn't either Cyclop. The Bush administration has allocated more money to education than it has to defense in this last budget period--huge increases over previous administrations. I know most of the New Mexico money has gone to fund high level salaries and perks for school administrators. Where did the money go in your state?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Oct, 2004 10:47 am
Meanwhile factcheck -- the org, not the com -- has come out with their summary, and it doesn't look good for Cheney. (Edwards wasn't perfect, either.)

Quote:
Summary

Cheney wrongly implied that FactCheck had defended his tenure as CEO of Halliburton Co., and the vice president even got our name wrong. He overstated matters when he said Edwards voted "for the war" and "to commit the troops, to send them to war." He exaggerated the number of times Kerry has voted to raise taxes, and puffed up the number of small business owners who would see a tax increase under Kerry's proposals.

Edwards  falsely claimed the administration "lobbied the Congress" to cut the combat pay of troops in Iraq, something the White House never supported, and he used misleading numbers about jobs.


Lots of good stuff, won't quote the whole thing.

http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=272
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Oct, 2004 10:48 am
Fox, Yes, the Bush administration allocated more moneyh to education, but leave no child behind was underfunded by 41 billion dollars. Do your homework, kiddo.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 11:34:26