19
   

IS RUSH A CONSERVATIVE?? WHAT DOES HE CONSERVE?

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2012 12:10 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
You're quite happy to bet other people's lives on the ridiculous notion
the world will be made safer by invading Iran.
Yeah; It was a "ridiculous notion" that the Japs 'd bomb Pearl Harbor
or that the Moslems 'd bomb the World Trade Center.




izzythepush wrote:
It won't, it will be made less safer, less safer for Americans, less safer for New Yorkers.
It's the wrong call to make.
Your naked assertions r unconvincing.
We gotta do what we gotta do, because we r NOT (passively) suicidal.




izzythepush wrote:
Iran is losing influence hand over fist, let it run out of steam, don't lend the clerics credibility.
How much "influence" or "credibility" did the Japs need to bom Pearl Harbor?
How much did the Moslems need to bom the WTC??
As a citizen of a seaport, I care a lot less about those considerations
than I care about getting nuked by the Moslems.





David
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2012 12:12 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
David, why are you so horrified by the prospect of Iran having nuclear weapons, but at the same time quite relaxed about North Korea having them?
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2012 12:34 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
David, why are you so horrified by the prospect of Iran having nuclear weapons,
but at the same time quite relaxed about North Korea having them?
I cannot accept your premise, Izzy.
My position toward North Korea is not different than
my position toward Persia.





David
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2012 01:19 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
And since North Korea got nukes, none have gone off in NY have they?
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2012 03:16 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Yeah; It was a "ridiculous notion" that the Japs 'd bomb Pearl Harbor


Actually it was well known with a small circle.

Quote:
or that the Moslems 'd bomb the World Trade Center.


You not only had a war criminal in office in George jr, Om, you had an idiot, too.

Yoiu see, they're really not all that concerned about sacrificing a good number of OmSig's.

Quote:
The White House had (at least ) 28 Advanced Intelligence Warnings Prior to 9/11

Compiled by Eric Smith

...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/SMI402A.html
OmSigDAVID
 
  3  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2012 03:29 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
Yeah; It was a "ridiculous notion" that the Japs 'd bomb Pearl Harbor
JTT wrote:
Actually it was well known with a small circle.
I tend to agree with u, J.
Is this the first time that I 've said that ?




DAVID wrote:
or that the Moslems 'd bomb the World Trade Center.
JTT wrote:
You not only had a war criminal in office in George jr,
WHICH war crime did he commit, J?
Will u quote the applicable statute??




JTT wrote:
Om, you had an idiot, too.
I disagree, but I don't care for all of his policies, either.



JTT wrote:
Yoiu see, they're really not all that concerned about sacrificing a good number of OmSig's.
It was nice of u to share that.



Quote:
The White House had (at least ) 28 Advanced Intelligence Warnings Prior to 9/11

Compiled by Eric Smith

...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/SMI402A.html
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Mar, 2012 10:07 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
I tend to agree with u, J.
Is this the first time that I 've said that ?


Beats me, Om, but if it is then it's a red letter day - first time you've ever been right.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2012 01:11 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Are 18th Century views that relevant in the 21st Century?


Yes. Very much so. The notion of freedom was not merely a good idea for our ancestors. It is a good idea for all generations.



izzythepush wrote:
Jefferson's views on slavery spring to mind.


A better example is the way our Constitution protects our right to carry concealed handguns for self defense.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2012 01:14 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
The Cubans liberated themselves back in the 50's.


Just the opposite. They were enslaved by a tyrannical regime.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2012 01:22 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
A conservative is a man who rigidly adheres to the filosofy
that the Founders set forth in the US Constitution,
including its Bill of Rights,
and who does not deviate therefrom.


that really doesn't make any sense. The "founders" were not conservatives, they were revolutionaries. They advocated change.

The thought that they imagined the U.S. remaining stagnant over the centuries is truly odd.


They did contemplate a bit of change, but not all that much. That is why they made the Constitution very difficult to amend.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2012 01:29 pm
@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Because thay r fanatical Moslems that hate us,
ergo: 9/11/1. That was bad enuf, without going nuclear.


Maybe they'd hate America just a little less if, back in the 1950s, the CIA hadn't helped overthrow Persia's democratically-elected government and help install a tyrant, the shah. I suspect that all that American freedom-talk must be ringing hollow to them.


Why would they hate us for that, when they were the ones who overthrew their democracy and installed the Shah, and we were merely helping them do it?



Thomas wrote:
I also think Ron Paul has a good point: the bad guys America tries to quash in its current meddlings tend to be the unintended consequences of America's past meddlings. (See Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden, all armed and made more dangerous by the US.)


The US did not arm Osama bin Laden in any way.

I am not familiar with our policies regarding conventional weapons for Saddam, but am familiar with claims we gave him chemical weapons. (The claims that we supplied Saddam with chemical weapons, are false.)
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2012 01:41 pm
@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:
9/11 was an embarrassment of America's national security more than anything else. It didn't even make a dent in America's 2001 murder rate. Not worth giving up ones libertarian principles over.


The intentional slaughter of thousands of civilians is no big deal?
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2012 01:51 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
InfraBlue wrote:
Why do you suppose they hate us?


For the same reason as 1,OOO years ago.
Thay r moven by their religion to conquer the world,
like the nazis & the commies wanted, but we stand in their way.

David


Their hatred stems from something much more recent. We tried to conquer them first.


We did nothing of the sort.



InfraBlue wrote:
Shouldn't we shout mea culpa and redress our wrongdoing against them?


No. We should neither apologize nor offer redress for fictitious wrongdoing.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2012 01:58 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Accordingly, I wish the Jews very GOOD LUCK and 1OO% success
in taking out those nuclear facilities, as soon as possible.
As an American, I also wish to apologize to them
for any restraint upon them by obama.





David


Obama has no power to restrain Israel. He can only persuade them by making a good argument, or strike a bargain with them.

Quite possibly Obama has convinced Israel to postpone the bombardment of Iran by offering to have the US military conduct a much more thorough bombardment of Iran if Israel waits.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2012 02:11 pm
@revelette,
Quote:
Beyond that, Mr. Obama said that administration and intelligence officials — in the United States and in Israel — believe that Iran has not acquired a nuclear weapon yet, and that there is still time for sanctions to force the Iranian regime to give up any weapons program it might have. “At this stage it is my belief we have a window of opportunity,” Mr. Obama said.

“And so this notion that somehow we have a choice to make in the next week or two weeks or month or two months is not borne out by the facts,” the president said.


True that there is a little bit of time left. But it's getting close.

Not terribly likely that sanctions will work, but we'll see.



Quote:
He repeated a pledge he made on Sunday when he addressed the Aipac pro-Israel conference, that he would not “countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon, adding, “My policy is not containment.”


Yep. Sooner or later, it's going to be time to bomb Iran.



revelette wrote:
earlier today I found a poll which said most Israelis do not want war with Iran, I can't find a more recent poll of Americans but in November, 85% of Americans were against war with Iran.

Poll: Israeli Public Don’t want War with Iran

Poll: 85% of Americans against Iran war


The second poll at least is coming from the Iranian ministry of propaganda.

In any case, even if the polls were true, the war is going to be necessary unless Iran stops their illegal drive to develop nuclear weapons.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2012 02:13 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
The Cubans liberated themselves back in the 50's.
I look upon Tom Swift with mercy in my mind
and good will for his future in my heart, for a non-malicious person.

U disagree, taking a much harsher, more severe, sadistic position toward Tom,
but u express approval, admiration of communist slavery, the most intense political abhorrence
since the Big Bang, intentionally inflicting unlimited pains, terrors and degradations upon its slaves,
whose most fortunate victims r those who were swiftly murdered by Castro when he took over.

Your posts indicate that u believe that drunken driving is worse than communist slavery,
a position from which I must dissent, with enthusiasm.

Lemme just say that I 'm glad that u did not grow up in slavery n live your life in degradation, Izzy.
Maybe u disagree. U have the right to your opinion (but not under communist slavery).





David
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2012 02:14 pm
@revelette,
revelette wrote:
Not to sound like JTT, but aren't we the only country who has used nuclear weapons in wartime?


We used them against military targets, at the height of a brutal war against a cruel enemy.

That is quite different from the way terrorists target civilians in a time of peace.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2012 02:21 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
It's also worth bearing in mind that since the revolution Iran hasn't attacked anyone.


Tell that to the hundreds of American peacekeepers massacred in Lebanon in the 1980s.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2012 02:33 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
InfraBlue wrote:
Their hatred stems from something much more recent.
We tried to conquer them first.


Specify when n where, please ?

David


When we overthrew their government and installed a son-of-a bitch of ours, the Shah.


Nonsense. The clerics who currently run Iran are the ones who overthrew their democracy and installed the Shah.

We did help them do it, but it was hardly something we just came along and imposed on hapless Iranians from out of the blue.



InfraBlue wrote:
Quote:
I like to keep an open mind.
I don 't oppose dialog,
but let 's put out the fire first.

According to the US' spooks, there is no fire to put out first.


The definition of "build a bomb" is being defined rather narrowly there, as actually making the components and assembling them into a working device.

It is true that Iran is not yet doing that. But they are currently rushing headlong towards developing the capability to do so.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2012 02:46 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
I like to keep an open mind.
I don 't oppose dialog,
but let 's put out the fire first.


Dave, do you honestly think a strike on Iran would put a fire out? Are you mad? A strike on Iran will do a lot of things, but it's not going to put out any fires.


Iran will not produce many weapons using equipment which has been blown to shrapnel.



izzythepush wrote:
It might start a few though. Remember how attacking Saddam Hussein was such a good thing? Now Iran is controlling a lot of what's going on in Iraq.


Nonsense.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 11/08/2024 at 06:41:49