@edgarblythe,
Are you deliberately missing the point ed?
On the Channel 4 documentary about the case somebody, a lawyer I think, said that Media had represented Dr Murray as having been specifically sent down from Heaven to kill the King of Pop.
It was also claimed that the judge refused to let the jury see video evidence that the defence wanted to show that MJ's physical state was not up to performing in the 50 London concerts in a satisfactory manner. So that's a fourth item suggesting that the court was biased. The refusal to allow evidence relating to the dermatologist, the allowing of Dr White's emotional outburst and the reasons for refusing bail being the other three.
That nobody on this thread is prepared to allow the slightest validity to anything I have said suggests that the bias is general.
The verdict cannot but cause the administration of Propofol, or any other drug with similar liability reducing instructions on the label, to require hospitalisation of the patient. So an expansion of the medical profession is involved to add to the legal profession's expansion into the area of doctor/patient relations plus what must be the joyous contemplation of bringing AEG within its grazing territory.
