16
   

How deep did coverup go in Penn State child sex abuse case?

 
 
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 04:34 pm
Quote:
STATE COLLEGE — Penn State assistant coach Mike McQueary, a key witness in the child sex abuse scandal that has engulfed the school, has been placed on administrative leave.

School president Rod Erickson announced the move Friday, a day after the school said McQueary would not be present when the Nittany Lions play Nebraska on Saturday because he has received threats.

McQueary testified in a grand jury investigation that eventually led to child sex-abuse charges being filed against former Penn State defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky. The ensuing scandal brought down longtime coach Joe Paterno, who was fired by university trustees amid growing criticism that he should have done more to stop the alleged abuse.

McQueary, who testified that he saw Sandusky sodomizing a boy in the shower in 2002, has endured similar scrutiny. The university's athletic department released a one-line statement Thursday night saying it would be "in the best interest of all" if the receivers coach didn't attend the season's final home game at Beaver Stadium. The school did not provide details on precisely who threatened McQueary.

"It became clear that coach McQueary could not function in this role under these circumstances," Erickson said Friday, adding McQueary was told of the decision Friday afternoon.

Besides Paterno, school president Graham Spanier also has been fired.

Athletic director Tim Curley and vice president Gary Schultz have each been charged with perjury and failing to report an incident of abuse in 2002 to authorities. Curley has taken administrative leave, while Schultz — who was already working on an interim capacity — has returned to retirement.

Paterno has not been implicated, and prosecutors have said he is not a target of the investigation. Curley and Schultz, through their attorneys, have denied wrongdoing.

The campus leaders faced mounting public criticism for failing to call police and prevent further suspected cases. So, too, has McQueary, who has not spoken publicly. His mother, Anne, said Thursday they have been advised not to comment.

Described in court papers as distraught about witnessing the 2002 attack, separate newspaper accounts from the time indicate McQueary appeared in the months and years that followed in charity events that Sandusky also took part in, or were to benefit Sandusky's group The Second Mile.

Asked if McQueary would be fired, Erickson said "there are complexities to that issue that I am not prepared to go into at this point."

In forums online, and in comments on other websites, some have indeed called for McQueary to be ousted, but the assistant coach could be protected as a whistleblower.

Gerald J. Williams, a partner at a Philadelphia law firm, said Pennsylvania law is broad in protecting a person who reports wrongdoing, as long as that person is part of a governmental or quasi-governmental institution, such as Penn State.

Asked if McQueary was protected by whistleblower status, trustee Boyd Wolff said Friday after a board meeting, "He's a witness. He's different from the others, so he has to be treated differently.


http://dailyitem.com/0100_news/x869147573/Mike-McQueary-put-on-administrative-leave-at-Penn-State

Damn right...the university sure did not want to act against the one person who had direct knowledge of the crime as well as the ability to stop said crime in progress .... and refused to call the cops. Meanwhile those with second hand knowledge after the fact who did not call the cops are pilloried. Makes total sense to me! *sarcasm*
Builder
 
  1  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 05:04 pm
http://www.onionsportsnetwork.com/articles/sports-media-asks-molestation-victims-what-this-me,26609/


Quote:
STATE COLLEGE, PA—After former Penn State defensive coach Jerry Sandusky was charged Saturday with multiple counts of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, corruption of minors, indecent assault, and unlawful contact with minors, the national sports media sought out his victims this week to ask if they were worried about Joe Paterno's legacy and how their molestations might affect the recently fired head coach's place in the history books.

Describing the downfall of Paterno as "clearly the most devastating thing to come out of the sex scandal," outlets from ESPN to USA Today asked Sandusky's victims if, while being forced to engage in oral and anal sex with a man 40 to 50 years their senior, their primary fear was for Paterno's reputation—and, specifically, for how revelations of their suffering might diminish his two national championships, three Big Ten titles, and 24 bowl victories.

"This is obviously a sensitive subject for you, and I understand how difficult and uncomfortable it must be to talk about the abrupt end of JoePa's career, but as a journalist, it's my responsibility to weed past the 40 counts of sexual misconduct over a 15-year period and the gross negligence on the part of school authorities and ask about what is really important here: Joe Paterno's football accomplishments," Steve Wieberg of USA Today said to one anonymous victim, who was 10 years old when Sandusky assaulted him and who now suffers from irreparable emotional and psychological damage. "He is the winningest Division I football coach of all time and a man whose very name is synonymous with excellence. As a Penn State fan yourself, this must be very tough for you."

"When you told your family how Coach Sandusky forced you to engage in illicit 'soap battles' with him in the shower, what were their thoughts on Joe Paterno?" he continued as the abuse victim stared silently back at him. "Was their immediate response worry and concern for how this might tarnish his six Fiesta Bowl wins?"

Given the delicate situation, sportswriters said they felt the need to tread lightly and initially only asked victims how they thought Paterno might be feeling during this difficult time. They then followed up with more substantial questions about being exploited and preyed upon by a sexual deviant, such as how the victims thought their being pinned against a wall while Sandusky assaulted them might hurt Penn State's 2012 recruiting class; how covering up a systematic pedophile victim-grooming pipeline, in the form of youth football camps, might damage the culture of winning Paterno worked so hard to establish; and whether they were worried about the mental state of the team heading into Saturday's game against Nebraska.

In addition, various representatives from CNN, The New York Times, and Sports Illustrated asked the victims—all of whom will reportedly have to undergo therapy for the rest of their lives—how they thought Paterno's wife, Sue, and their five children were holding up.

Sources later confirmed that one victim, who couldn't stop shaking his head while being questioned, began sobbing openly when asked if he would join the throngs of students who took to the streets to protest the head coach's ouster, and if he thought his molestation would overshadow Paterno's renowned ability to graduate his players.

"The victim I spoke to, who was 12 years old when Sandusky first took advantage of him, looked very upset throughout the entire interview," Sports Illustrated writer Stewart Mandel said. "And when I asked whether he was concerned not just for how Joe Paterno would be remembered, but also for the football program's ability to recover, he told me the interview was over and I should get out of his house."

"Can you blame him, though?" Mandel added. "A coaching legend's reputation hangs in the balance. I'm just as hurt and frustrated as he is."

Many members of the sports media said they found the victims equally uncooperative and generally disinterested in Paterno's Bear Bryant, Walter Camp, and Eddie Robinson Coach of the Year Awards. According to the journalists, shock and trauma were possible reasons for this response, and the victim's were more than likely speechless due to the thought of Paterno's storied career ending on such a sour note.

"I think right now they just need some time," said ESPN senior writer Ivan Maisel, who, in light of the allegations of misconduct at every level of Penn State's administration and the dozens of ruined lives that resulted, filed a column about Paterno's football legacy Wednesday. "I'm sure they'll be better when the dust settles and they realize just how impressive 409 victories really is."

At press time, the victims of years and years of psyche-destroying sexual abuse released a joint statement saying they were not concerned about Joe Paterno's legacy.


If this is true, the media seems to think very little of the victims, and more about poor Joe.
Rockhead
 
  2  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 05:07 pm
@Builder,
are you familiar with the onion?
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 05:17 pm
@Rockhead,
Rockhead wrote:

are you familiar with the onion?
the wail "what about the victims!" has been constant, and loud. Where the **** have you been Rock?
Rockhead
 
  2  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 05:22 pm
@hawkeye10,
I don't come to a2k for discussion with you.

please quit attempting to converse with me...

thank you.
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 05:26 pm
@Rockhead,
Rockhead wrote:

I don't come to a2k for discussion with you.

please quit attempting to converse with me...

thank you.
Whatever, but I will continue to feel free to point out what an uniformed idiot you are....
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  3  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 05:28 pm
@Rockhead,
Quote:
are you familiar with the onion?


Behind the story is a huge sad chunk of truth
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 05:33 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

Quote:
are you familiar with the onion?


Behind the story is a huge sad chunk of truth
We can weep for the victims but how productive will that be? They will get made as whole as they can be by the $750 million that it is projected that they will collect from Penn State. Cry if you want to, but it should be considered optional.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 05:38 pm
I was never in that kind of beam at a university, much less that university, but I get it, re being quiet as outliers, at least for a half hour or so.

I can see the original person who saw the rape (alleged) being long time freaked out, did his duty and got shut up.

I think, myself, he should have gone past that, but I'm not judging.

My further question is re university police and local city police. At least at UCLA, there were some messes in the past on all that. We had at least one thread on all this, the library incident.

So, if one reported to uni police, so what?
It got to local police, so what?
I'm very cynical - there is a reason to keep a university in primo position, for just about most.
I think this kind of thing should go to investigation beyond the local.
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  2  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 05:40 pm
@farmerman,
not disagreeing a bit, FM.

but one needs to recognize sarcasm when it uses quotes...
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  3  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 05:41 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
We can weep for the victims but how productive will that be?

Youve dispelled all doubts that Ive had. Thank you Mr Clemens
Builder
 
  1  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 06:21 pm
@farmerman,
Re: Rockhead (Post 4790099)
Quote:
Quote:

are you familiar with the onion?



Farmerman wrote;
Quote:
Behind the story is a huge sad chunk of truth


I agree FM.
I'm guessing that the onion is a second-rate source for "news", but at this point in time, what source is 100% reliable?

I note that the article quoted from several other sources, which should make it rather easy to either be disproven, or liable to be sued for libel.

I've been researching the ongoing effects of childhood sexual assault and rape on adult survivors. Many of those survivors consider death to be a viable alternative to living with the constant memory.

I, personally, find it rather disturbing, and a blight on society in general, that the career demise of a popular coach takes precedence over the (possible) scores of ruined lives left in the wake of this blatant coverup.
Rockhead
 
  2  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 06:24 pm
@Builder,
do or do not, there is no try...

"The Onion is an American news satire organization."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Onion
Builder
 
  1  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 06:27 pm
@Rockhead,
I get updates from the following source, Rockhead. I trust their judgement.


Quote:
AfterSilence.org
Let's thank the Onion for pointing out the absurdity of the recent media coverage of Penn State and the sexual assault of children.
Rockhead
 
  3  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 06:31 pm
@Builder,
so we both understand what just happened here, right?

we need an irony smiley...
Builder
 
  1  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 06:43 pm
@Rockhead,
Agreed. Here's a snippet from the article from AfterSilence.

AfterSilence.org
‎"Shed no tears for Paterno... ...Spare me the indignation over Paterno getting fired over the phone. If Paterno had picked one up 13 years ago and called the most powerful law-enforcement official he knew in the state, not just the top campus cop, he might have saved countless boys from an alleged pedophile — and quite likely his job, his school and his legacy."
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 06:45 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

Quote:
We can weep for the victims but how productive will that be?

Youve dispelled all doubts that Ive had. Thank you Mr Clemens
Do you REALLY expect that tears and pity are going to matter to the victims at this point...after all these years of almost no one doing anything to stop a known child abuser? What is it supposed to be showing...how much we care?? People are generally not stupid farmerman, the victims know caring would have been a whole lot of people doing other than what they did.....you cant now after the fact cover up the lack of caring with emoting.
ehBeth
 
  1  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 06:55 pm
@Builder,
Builder wrote:

I'm guessing that the onion is a second-rate source for "news",


the Onion is a news source in the same way that Will Ferrell is an anchorman.
Builder
 
  1  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 07:00 pm
@ehBeth,
They quoted from ESPN and USA Today.

Both sources are a joke??
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Fri 11 Nov, 2011 07:02 pm
@Builder,
Builder wrote:

They quoted from ESPN and USA Today.

Both sources are a joke??
try google, a lot of people have been saying it. Dont believe everything you hear....there are more than a few on A2K who will piss in your ear and then tell you it is raining. Do your own thinking, and source your information widely.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/06/2024 at 11:59:28