52
   

Question to those who do or do not doubt Christianity

 
 
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 12:06 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
Sorry, can't really sympathize here. You've chosen to put yourself in a Chicken Little position.

according to your views....

Quote:
You've only been here for about 7 months and are up against a site with close to a decade of "prove it" going on (and pre-history at a couple of other sites going back even further).

I am not up against anyone...they seem to be against me....

Quote:
If you're going to say something is the truth and don't back it up with third-party evidence when you first present it, be prepared to be pushed to prove it. It won't happen every time, but often enough for the requests for evidence not to be a surprise.

And that to me makes me feel sad inside, that humans on here are truly not willing to take another ones word for things....It really is! I don't live my life that way, So I don't feel inclined for everyone to disect and scutinize my every word! but thanks for the heads up...I guess I can spot a wolf in sheep's clothing more easily now!!

Quote:
The membership of A2k skews old (ahem mature), and there seems to be a disproportionate number of research types from a variety of professional backgrounds. People aren't just asking for proof to be difficult, but because they're interested and may go on to do more research of their own. It can be a bit link-heavy here sometimes.

And do you think in all honesty, that that is what Setanta wished to do with this "evidence"??
0 Replies
 
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 12:07 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
Setanta's no devil and he's not dangerous to other posters physical health. If they can't handle the intellectual/emotional stress, they've probably already got him on ignore and won't notice if they come to his attention.

If that is true, then I will validate it, and make sure that is the case!!
0 Replies
 
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 12:11 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
there's the thing right there.

I have followed how you have misinterpreted/misunderstood (I'm still not sure if it's deliberate or not) what Setanta and other posters have said to you in this thread - I'd like to see what the 'atheists' actually said to you.
so, nope, not willing to take your word on it.

If you can't "genuinely show that you trust another human" than I am not inclined to spend/waste my time to "prove" validate/dispel your doubts that these posts happened, and were said, and that atheists make mistakes as well as everyone else, including me!!
0 Replies
 
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 12:31 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
The membership of A2k skews old (ahem mature),

Are you implying that because I chose not to fall into/Setanta/Your trap, I am in fact immature>? If that is the case, I eagerly "choose" to help and "gladly" and "willingly" will "protect" these people from this type of "trying to be" the "most correct of the most, mentality"

Once the 2 of you realize maturity has/and maintains much more important things indeed, than "using evidence" to be vindictive toward someone else, in their faults...(with which the both of you are guilty of as well, so I guess it fair ground for others to "take your words" and be vindictive against you 2, correct?) than I will be inclined to "sift through" and "show" these posts, rather than the feeling I have now, which is to focus and embrace them, rather than the 2 of you...and be rest assured, I will not be tricked easily, (if at all, by this type of irrationality) or by cunning and or evasive ways...Setanta already went down that path but to no avail!!
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 12:56 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Nope, not suggesting you're immature.

I was trying to be nice about saying that there are old posters here who may have time on their hand to pursue things that posters at a 'younger' site might not.
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 01:09 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
I was trying to be nice about saying that there are old posters here who may have time on their hand to pursue things that posters at a 'younger' site might not.

Please explain what the above statements mean? For I do not understand what you are saying....
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 01:13 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
In any event, if that is in fact "truthful" and your not implying I am immature, than I apologize to you....whether or not you meant immature or not, only you know the answer to it....

But if your willing to explain. I am interested in hearing exactly what you meant by the statement....
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  2  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 02:08 pm
XXSpadeMasterXX I am willing to except a sign as proof that God exist but it will be one hell of a sign.
I do realize that being it is a sign and not evidence it could be that the spaghetti monster made the sign but being that we would be praying to God and then seeing the sign that we asked for immediately after, it will be enough for me to believe in God.
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 02:14 pm
@reasoning logic,
Thank you so very much for that post indeed! and it shows "appropriate accountability" "and a ton of balls to be completely Honest, I admit that!!" I must say I am impressed! and that "my understandings" are warrented, and I am NOT delusional in the least.....

But you do understand the ramifications and the beast you just unleashed by posting that, don't you?? If you wish to delete it, I would not be ashamed if you did it...for you validated me, and I know ALL ABOUT persecution my friend!! thank you, you have indeed made my day!!! I will NEVER, repeat NEVER forget this post, as long as I am on this website!! Have a great day Logic....(even if they ridicule you, never forget you had the GUTS and BALLS to post what in fact many of them were probably thinking to themselves!!!) (and further more I have already voted your post up, because whether most agree or disagree you had the utter courage to admit those words)...and I will back up my voting up, and validate you by saying if I had the means to give you +10 on that post, I would do so!!!!
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 02:28 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
And I will not, REPEAT not throw you to the wolves like they will do, and will go out of my way to protect, and defend you....as much as I can...

Just on the basis of balls and tunacity alone!!
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 02:30 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
What do you think about this?

http://www.thenazareneway.com/Origins%20of%20Christmas%20Traditions.htm
igm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 02:54 pm
Happier days: URL: http://able2know.org/topic/171745-1#post-4612884

XXSpadeMasterXX's topic: Who is the best all around MLB player of all time?

XXSpadeMasterXX: My vote goes to Willie Mays

Setanta said: “Willie was my hero when i was a kid, and i was a big New York Giants fan... ”

Merry Christmas… one and all!
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 03:00 pm
Better watch out the church seems to be getting more involved.



0 Replies
 
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  0  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 03:58 pm
@reasoning logic,
please bare with me, it says in the Bible, Prophets suffer from sleeplessness, and I have slept about 5 full hrs in about 2 full days!

I believe that people followed previous traditions, from previous religions etc for a long time, before and after Christ...

Now I would not doubt if early Christians truly did not know the exact day or time in which he was born, and could have potentially picked a date from various religions before Jesus....Like I said myself, and agree with Martin Luther, it was Not December 25, but more toward October...

But in any event, I do not believe that Jesus, and the religions of Jesus will fade and die off, and prove to be false, and believe all these religions are promoting the one and same God, Divinely inspired that is depicted in the Christian Bible...(I will explain how so later on)...

My position more coincides with these statements on the webpage you linked...

Among the early Christians there were three very different doctrines concerning Jesus:



Quote:
1) He was born of Mary and Joseph in the ordinary course of nature and was only made divine by spiritual adoption at his baptism.

(I don't believe this to be true) (personally) to me the symbolism with a baptism, has little to nothing to do with the water, but EVERYTHING to do with the acceptance of Christ...(Spiritual Baptism Jesus talks about)...So in other words, it really does not make a difference in my eyes if you EVER get baptized by water, but that at the very moment you "decide" to devout your life to Christ, is when your "truly" baptized, and likewise confirmed...therefor, being baptized has little to nothing at all in having water poured on your head...You could do that 1000 times in your life, but if you don't believe in Jesus then what is the point to it all? The purpose of water is to symbolize purity etc...Which do you think is better in God's eyes? Having water poured over your head 1000 different times, or one Spiritual acceptance of Jesus, and your "baptism" and "Conformation"? Even though the Church would never except such Ideas...For the Bible States...that Fathers who speak well of the Prophets, are false ones, and Fathers who speak bad about the Prophets, are the real ones....So I know my Prophetic experiences are true, for I know that almost NO Father of the Christian God, would believe anything I truly have to explain to them to correct...



Quote:
2) The doctrine of the Gnostics who said that Jesus was never born, was not in fact human at all, and had no earthy parents. He was a spiritual being sent by the Supreme God for a brief ministry to deliver the message of salvation and redemption.

(I don't believe this is exactly true either) The fact of Jesus coming as a Human is very important indeed if you think about it....he had no earthly parents in very debatable...for If God the Father, is his Father, then St. Joseph is not his father, or the Heavenly Father Jesus is talking about, But I do believe that Mary was His earthly Mother, and I believe she was the Jesus Christ of women if you will...but none the less, they got the main goal right in this understanding in that he was here for a brief ministry to deliver the message of salvation and redemption.



Quote:
3) The doctrine which was became the doctrine of the Catholic Church: Jesus was born of a virgin, similar to the myths found in virtually every mystery cult for centuries.

(I feel this is the most accurate indeed)...whether it was said that it was found in virtually every mystery cult for centuries is irrelivent...what if all these Mythologies, and religions, before, and after Christ, were directly Speaking about the coming of the savior Jesus Christ...and that myothologies thousands of years before, were prophetically inclined to understand that a Messiah would some day come....and that they by their nature were portraying Jesus Christ himself, Just because it is found in other cult religions or Mythologies, does not mean that every one of them, had a Birth of a son by a virgin, on December 25 or around it....it is more plausible to read all that, and think that the Heavenly Father was telling each and every one of those religions, that there is importance to excepting this Virgin Birth, of a savior, various religions had different names etc.. we call him Jesus, but I think they all depict one and the same God....manifested way before anyone knows or thinks even possible...today he is in fact known as Jesus Christ....

And to further explain how this is indeed possible....according to the Old Testament, When Moses was on Mt. Sinai, talking with God, (who keep in mind is one and the same as Jesus) and (also keep in mind from the other perspective, for the sake of debate, Moses had a stutter problem) but none the less you would believe God chose Moses for a divine purpose....and according to the scripture, it says something to the effect of...when God told Moses his name, Moses said it was a name he could not pronounce....Which tells me there is a very high chance, that God's actual name is probably NOT Jehovah, and may not even be Jesus Christ.....For you would believe Moses would be able to pronounce these names, even if he had a stutter, because he was Jewish...and understood Jewish...well basically I believe Moses spoke either Phonecian, Hebrew, or Egyptian....but the point is if God wanted his name revealed it would have been revealed....there is a reason of signifigance as to why God says through Moses, it was a name he could not Pronounce....which tells me its not Jehovah, its not Allah, its not Mohammad, its not David, and could even possibly not even Jesus Christ...for all we know...according to how Jesus would be pronounced back then would be Yeshua.....pronounced Yesh-u-ah....but the importance is the acceptance into God himself, and the importance of believing in faith in him, and accepting that you believe in your heart, confess with your mouth, and except that Jesus died for our sins, and you will be saved...(if he exists)


Quote:
And so January 6 was accepted almost universally as the date of the Epiphany, and a great many churches, especially in the East, began teaching that it was also the physical birthday of Jesus. In various Catholic countries this is still the case.

Like I said, I doubt that Jesus Christ was actually born on December 25....
0 Replies
 
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 04:01 pm
@igm,
And a Merry Christmas to you as well my atheist friend!!!

good to see your face again....(or to be litteral) (just you pink little square, LOL)

Mr. Green Mr. Green Mr. Green Very Happy Very Happy Wink
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 04:13 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
So sorry all, Particularly Igm, for I wished to catch up...but I am extremely exhausted...and wish to try to sleep at least a few if I can....

BTW...Again Logic, I will NEVER forget what you said and did!...have a great day or night all!! I am out!!
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2011 08:12 pm
Whats up with the trinity church being the 3rd largest real estate holder and not wanting to share? Greedy bastards?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KikcHBYmRi0
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2011 12:38 am
Got those links for me yet, Buddy? Or are you still just blowing smoke?
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2011 12:39 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Yeah, you're hateful--and the only problem i have with you is that you lie about what i've posted. I don't have a problem with your silly superstition, nor the bullshit claims you make but can't back up--just the lies.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2011 12:42 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
I asked you to link the posts because i consider you to either be mistaken about what was written, or just peddling bullshit. I don't battle with people--and if you can't handle criticism, you shouldn't be here. I do pay attention. This is a direct quote of your post:

Quote:
According to you, who also claims that an atheists is incapable of making a mistake and saying that if God gave them a sign, they would embrace a God....


It's hardly any fault of mine if you can't coherently post what you mean to say. If you can't coherently express yourself, that's your mistake, not mine. I understand my native language quite well, thank you. You however, don't seem to do too well with it.
 

Related Topics

Atheism - Discussion by littlek
The tolerant atheist - Discussion by Tuna
Another day when there is no God - Discussion by edgarblythe
church of atheism - Discussion by daredevil
Can An Atheist Have A Soul? - Discussion by spiritual anrkst
THE MAGIC BUS COMES TO CANADA - Discussion by Setanta
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 04/08/2025 at 06:53:44