@firefly,
firefly wrote:
But hate crime/bias-crime laws aren't making distinctions based on race/sex/religion in terms of how the laws are applied--these laws apply to everyone. They simply refer to criminal acts directed toward an individual or group because of hatred or animosity toward the entire group to which the individual belongs.
If a gay man is beaten and killed, simply because he is gay, and for no other reason, the crime could be considered a bias-related murder. How would seeing it as a bias-related crime stir up more hatred or hostility toward gay men?
The thing is, intent its subjective. Its very easy for a crime commited against a gay man to be made into a hate crime even if it wasnt, and its very easy for a hate crime commited against a majority to "dogde" the hate-crime punishment due to the uncommoness of crimes being commited against majorities.
I mean, its easy when the criminal admits the hatred against a group or made it pretty obvious before/during the crime, but what if he didnt and denies it? Thats where unfortunate jumps to conclusions and intention guessing are gonna happen.
And, off course, the more media attention whatever minority group the victim belongs to has, and the smallest it is, the greater the chances of that the man's actions will be interpreted as a hate crime independently of that being the case or not. This creates an overall situation where crimes against minorities are punished more severely than crimes against non-minority members.
And injustice breeds hatred.
firefly wrote:
But there are different races, how can anyone not admit that?
True, but its something we have to forget. For racism to ever end, people need to stop looking at a white man and a black man and taking special note of their different skin colors and making the related assumptions. This will never happen as long as even the laws themselves make distinction between the races.