On Voting Republicans Out Of Office

Now thats a valid correction. It was Iraq but my allegation that he lied is still valid.

You can't prove that. So it is a moot point.

ROFLMAO....
That is so typical of people like you that spout the RW crap but don't understand it. Ever consider applying the proof requirement to your own statements? Nah. You have a different standard for yourself.

Read this.

http://whitehauser.com/war/cia-confirms-bush-wmd-lie/

What do you think you are spouting? What hasn't been proved about the IRS that tells you anything else.
Why did Eric Holder bust Gibsons guitar conservative donor with a technicality?
Why was a reporter for CBS computer hacked?
All facts.

Now that would be the insult supreme ignoring cheap shots from a radical right-wing poster. Our species is a social one, desiring to communicate with others, exchanging ideas in our social world; refusing to speak to someone with a repulsive board persona sometime is the only way to go to balance one's emotional equilibrium.

What are you blabbering about the IRS? The majority of the crap people like you say about the IRS isn't factual. I can't respond until you give me specifics.

The Lacey amendment isn't a technicality. It's the law. The same law that is now being used against Lumber Liquidators. But Eric Holder didn't order the bust and it wasn't because of the conservative donor which makes 2 factual errors in your statement. By the way, Gibson admitted the wrong doing and paid a fine. Hardly, a technicality.
http://www.nashvillescene.com/pitw/archives/2012/08/07/gibson-acknowledges-lacey-act-violations-in-federal-settlement


Nothing in evidence to show it was hacked by the government. Maybe you need to ask Eastern European criminals why they did it.

Actually, they aren't all facts. You provided one fact although that was mixed with unsupported inuendo. Your IRS claim is so vague it isn't even close to a fact. Gibson's wasn't raided because of their political donations. They had violated the import law of the US. The claim about a CBS computer hacked by the government is unsubstantiated.

Do I ever?!?! I thought my heart would break when the partisan SCOTUS gave the US presidency to the most unqualified with serious flaws, one of which was the ability to think for himself. Cheney waltzed in and took over completely W's administration for the first term and only in the second term did W wake up to find what a miserable administration he had.

Dick Cheney deceitfully engineered a massive conflict in Iraq that has killed over 4,400 and maimed nearly 32,000 Americans, as well as leaving over 100,000 Iraqis dead.....all this was done in GWB's name.

Thousands of demonstrators attended the inaugural ceremonies in Washington, D.C. to protest the outcome and controversial circumstances of the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election. Four protesters were arrested and Bush's limousine was hit by a tennis ball and an egg thrown from the crowd during the inaugural parade.

After he left office, an interviewer asked him if he would ever apologize to the American people for taking them into a war that was TOTALLY unnecessary. W said no, after all, he believed Saddam Hussein had WMD. W is not UNintelligent, but his answers at time cause one to wonder if his brain has recovered from years of abusing hard liquor and cocaine sniffing?


Yes, I remember GWB's administration as if it were yesterday.

Are you trying to say Obama thinks for himself? What a joke that is.

Everything that you ever own comes from a big giant brother like me...

Statements like that explain, and illustrate, the arrogance of the left. More and more people see that.

The same way they see total economic failure.

I've think you've shown you have no clue what economic failure is. You can't even seem to get simple facts right and then you just change the subject when you are wrong.

What else would you call it? Actual unemployment is 12%, not to mention under-employment, God knows what that is.

Actual unemployment is 12%? Geez. Grow up and learn how to look up facts before you make an ass of yourself.

The BLS will give you all those numbers if you bothered to look them up. You will find 12% nowhere in the numbers.

By the way.. were you trying to give us the U6 numbers with your silly 12% figure? or the U5 numbers? or what?

And you will find no numbers like the Americans who have stopped looking or those whose benefits have run out. You are telling a half truth(kitman). And deliberately avoiding those facts that should figure in.

Yes, you will find them. They are just not part of the U3 numbers. Try the U6 numbers. I am not the one telling a half truth here coldjoint.

But let me ask you again, since you haven't responded, where did you get the 12% number from?

I was wrong it is worse. at least it was in May and not much has changed.
http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2013/05/06/unemployment-rate-jobs-market/

Let's look at what you said.


Yes, you were wrong. You spout crap without bothering to check your facts. Then you claim you were right even though you were clearly wrong.

By the way, do you know what the "real unemployment" rate was when Obama took office? I'll give you a hint. It was higher than it is now.

I couldn't say i heard it on the news and have you jump all over that.
This "recovery " is on life support and has a QE IV

Clearly you couldn't say that because the news you listen to is biased and fudges numbers. Did you bother to read the comments after the opinion piece you just quoted from?
Let me quote one of them for you.

You see coldjoint. You let someone play on your emotions.