RABEL222
 
  3  
Fri 25 Jul, 2014 02:19 pm
@buttflake,
Oh CJ. You have finally reveled yourself as a paid operative.
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Fri 25 Jul, 2014 08:21 pm
Sources Say Rep. Grimm Floating Plea Deal In Federal Case

By Nick Powell | Jul 25, 2014

http://www.cityandstateny.com/assets/image-cache/_img/article_images/Grimm.3e3867cd.png

Rep. Michael Grimm is due to go on trial in October to face a host of charges, including mail and wire fraud, but there is chatter this week in political circles that the congressman has floated a plea deal to federal prosecutors.

Sources from both sides of the aisle tell City & State that Grimm has proposed pleading guilty to a misdemeanor on the conditions of no jail time and being able to keep his seat. The sources also said that Grimm is particularly concerned with keeping his law license.

The 20-count federal indictment of Grimm includes allegations that he skimmed more than $1 million from a Manhattan health food restaurant he owned prior to running for office, as well as charges that he hired undocumented workers and filed false tax returns for the restaurant. If convicted, the charges carry a maximum prison sentence of 20 years.

In a written statement sent to City & State in response to inquiries for this article, a spokesman for Grimm said that the congressman had not yet had an opportunity to meet with the the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York, which brought the charges against him, as his counsel was only just approved by a U.S. District Court judge this week. The Daily News reported last Friday that Grimm had replaced his original lawyers with former Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Rashbaum.

“The Congressman’s counsel was just approved by the court on Monday of this week and has not yet had time to review the discovery material nor have any substantive conversations with EDNY," said Nick Iacono, Grimm's press secretary. The statement from Grimm's office gave no indication as to whether a plea deal was proposed or is being considered.

A spokesperson for U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch declined to comment.

One prominent legal expert, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that it would be "smart" for Grimm to cut such a deal to avoid the distraction of running for re-election with a looming federal trial. The attorney added that it would be a major blow to the U.S. Attorney's office if it were to accept such an offer months after it publicized a strongly worded federal complaint.

"It would surprise me if there were that kind of deal [on the table] because it seemed like a strong complaint, unless some of their witnesses have gone bad or the case fell apart in some way or was weakened because some of the people they were relying on, [but] that could happen," the attorney said. "[The witnesses] may have their own issues and they clam up or take the fifth. You never know."

The issue of Grimm keeping his law license would be entirely separate from any plea deal, as prosecutors have no discretion over that decision. Each of the state Supreme Court's appellate divisions has its own disciplinary committee, which has the power to suspend or disbar attorneys depending on the infraction. Were a plea deal to be made, Grimm would still face disciplinary action from the Second Appellate Division, which governs Richmond County.

Grimm, a Republican who represents Staten Island and parts of Brooklyn, is running for re-election against former City Councilman Domenic Recchia, the Democratic nominee.

Grimm is scheduled to appear in court on August 8th, when a trial date is expected to be set.



Additional reporting by Jon Lentz
0 Replies
 
buttflake
 
  -2  
Fri 25 Jul, 2014 09:07 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
reveled

I use to.
0 Replies
 
buttflake
 
  -2  
Fri 25 Jul, 2014 09:23 pm


Quote:
On Friday, Eleanor Holmes Norton, the non-voting congressional representative for the District of Columbia, defended the Obama Administration angrily as she declared that Americans have no right to know what goes on in their government.

“You don’t have a right to know everything in a separation-of-powers government, my friend. That is the difference between a parliamentary government and a separation-of-powers government,” Norton claimed during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing.

Allow me to make this clear: A Democrat representative told the House Oversight Committee that they have no right to scrutinize government. The committee, as the name would suggest, is responsible for overseeing the federal government as a check against abuses of power.

What Norton seems to have confused is that it is the very principle of scrutiny that defines a government that is equipped with a separation of powers. Each branch of government checks the power of the other branches of government.

It’s amazing that America possesses even one citizen who would believe such an obvious falsehood; it’s even more outrageous that America has a representative in Congress who believes this.

http://www.tpnn.com/2014/07/25/video-democrat-rep-you-dont-have-a-right-to-know-whats-going-on-in-your-government/
0 Replies
 
buttflake
 
  -2  
Sat 26 Jul, 2014 12:47 pm
Quote:
Scientific Study: Socialism Destroys Morality


Duh!
http://moonbattery.com/?p=48431
Quote:

Free market capitalism is inherently honest. The more you offer other people, the more you are compensated. Socialism is inherently dishonest, as it divorces work from reward. You get ahead in a capitalist system by producing something of value. You get ahead under socialism by taking wealth produced by others.

The farther a country deteriorates into socialism, the more impossible it is to live morally, the more our morals shrivel and die, reducing us to a lower level of human being. This could be why the lowest among us tend to be the most eager to plunge America deeper into socialism.



0 Replies
 
buttflake
 
  -1  
Sat 26 Jul, 2014 12:48 pm
@parados,
Quote:
Fact: everyone that lives is a liar.


That's nice. So you are a liar. End of discussion.
0 Replies
 
buttflake
 
  -1  
Sat 26 Jul, 2014 12:51 pm
@parados,
Quote:
that a 13 year old could refute it.


You had better hire one.
0 Replies
 
buttflake
 
  -1  
Sat 26 Jul, 2014 01:12 pm

Quote:
Hillary Spokesman: Anti-Hillary Books Should Not ‘Be Allowed’


What kind of people would support someone who believes that? Hillary pays the guy.
Quote:
The First Family Detail by Ronald Kessler, set for release next month, will joinClinton, Inc. by the Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper and Blood Feud by Ed Klein on bookshelves. Yesterday we reported that Clinton, Inc. has shot up the charts and now both Halper and Klein’s books are outselling Hillary Clinton’s recent memoir Hard Choices.

“With Klein, Halper and Kessler, we now have a Hat Trick of despicable actors concocting trashy nonsense,” Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said in an interview with the Washington Examiner. “Their behavior should neither be allowed nor enabled, and legitimate media outlets who know with every fiber of their beings that it is completely made up should not get down in the gutter with them.”


http://www.tpnn.com/2014/07/25/hillary-spokesman-anti-hillary-books-should-not-be-allowed/
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Sat 26 Jul, 2014 07:11 pm
http://upload.democraticunderground.com/imgs/2014/140725-todays-big-number.jpg
buttflake
 
  -1  
Sat 26 Jul, 2014 07:59 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Not if the courts say they can't. The poorly written law is ******* itself up. Of course, Obama is helping make it worse whenever he can.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Sun 27 Jul, 2014 02:24 am
@buttflake,
buttflake wrote:

Not if the courts say they can't. The poorly written law is ******* itself up. Of course, Obama is helping make it worse whenever he can.


It really frosts you dupes of the conservative agenda that Obamacare is actually working and becoming more popular with each passing day...doesn't it! Wink
RexRed
 
  2  
Sun 27 Jul, 2014 08:53 am
https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/t1.0-9/10511091_794662387233813_5582221743295527154_n.jpg
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sun 27 Jul, 2014 10:06 am
@RexRed,
The truth sits somewhere in between total support and total rejection. The fact that the GOP's only goal is to make Obama fail as our president is a sickness of our politics in the US. This is supposed to be a 'democracy' where politicians are supposed to negotiate and compromise. They've lost that ability six years ago when the nation elected a black president. It proves that bigotry is alive and well in this country. Bigotry is based on ignorance, and that's the overriding characteristic of our country. Sad.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  0  
Sun 27 Jul, 2014 10:28 am
@RexRed,
Your post leaves no other options except total support or total opposition.
I think that with many people the truth lies somewhere in between.

In my case, I dont totally support Obama, nor do I totally oppose him.
As with most Presidents, there are things he has done that I support, and things that I oppose.

To say its all or nothing concerning supporting him is to be just as bad as the repubs.
You leave no room for any other opinion but your own.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Sun 27 Jul, 2014 10:31 am
@RexRed,
You guys always forget the hate that was leveled at Bush. "No President has ever experienced"? Really? You are a joke if you think it started or has gotten worse with Obama.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Sun 27 Jul, 2014 11:12 am
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:

You guys always forget the hate that was leveled at Bush.


With good reason, 9/11 happened on his watch due to his incompetence. He screwed up royally in Iraq and Afghanistan, and alienated Iran with his moronic "axis of evil" speech, undermining all of the hard work by Jack Straw.

The World hated George Bush, and still does. He was the most disastrous president ever, and the spike in Global anti-Americanism is down to him.

Obama, in contrast, is only hated only by far right American extremists motivated by racism, and daily drip fed disinformation by extremist news agencies owned by the fabulously wealthy scared of losing influence and power. Globally Obama is still respected for one very good reason, he is not George Bush.
buttflake
 
  -1  
Sun 27 Jul, 2014 11:23 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
It really frosts you dupes of the conservative agenda that Obamacare is actually working and becoming more popular with each passing day...doesn't it! Wink


That is a false statement. Obamacare is still unpopular, not that what citizens think matters to Obama.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Sun 27 Jul, 2014 11:24 am
@izzythepush,
Not to mention the Great Recession that impacted the world economies, and hurt billions of people to boot!

What's to like about GW Bush? Can someone please provide this information?

0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
cicerone imposter
 
  7  
Sun 27 Jul, 2014 11:54 am
@buttflake,
Yup, from within all right! This congress has the lowest performance rating in history, because they vote "no" so often, they're known as the No Party. The latest Gallup poll shows congress' approval rating at 13%. The average since 1974 was 33%.

Why do you insist on showing your total ignorance of all things! Do you have a brain? Maybe, it's dead already. Get it checked out!

Obama's rating average is 48% for the past six years, but the latest Gallup poll shows him at 43% - still a great deal higher than congress.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 04/18/2024 at 09:30:50