cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Wed 16 Jul, 2014 06:08 pm
From the San Jose Mercury News.
Quote:
Santa Clara County seeks to welcome migrant kids flooding Texas border
By Eric Kurhi

[email protected]

POSTED: 07/16/2014 04:00:26 PM PDT4 COMMENTS| UPDATED: 50 MIN. AGO

SAN JOSE -- While some southwestern communities have seen flag-waving residents come out en masse to protest undocumented immigrant children being placed in their towns, Santa Clara County officials are looking at ways they can help what they call a humanitarian crisis at the Mexican border.

Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, D-San Jose, approached the Santa Clara County board of supervisors last week after returning from a border holding facility for the minors, who made the trip without their parents in an effort to escape strife in their homeland.

"There were hundreds of children, unaccompanied and completely by themselves," Lofgren said. "They were sleeping on cement floors, dozens of little girls sharing one toilet, with no privacy."

She said the kids, some as young as 5, were supposed to be removed to other facilities with in three days but there's no place for them to go. She urged the county to look into what can be done at a local level to give the kids a humane place to stay while they wait for a court date, at which time it is decided whether they can stay in the United States.

The proposal was warmly received by supervisors Dave Cortese and Cindy Chavez.

"We want to make it clear that we have a history in this county of welcoming children and families who are escapees in an immigrant refugee situation," Cortese said on Wednesday. "We want to uphold that legacy."

On Wednesday, Lofgren, Cortese and Chavez put out a joint statement along with Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Palo Alto, Rep. Mike Honda, D-San Jose, San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed and San Jose City Councilman Sam Liccardo urging "communities in the Bay Area, throughout the State of California, and across the nation to join us to make good on America's promise of fairness and due process."
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Wed 16 Jul, 2014 07:15 pm
re cicerone impostor

BRAVO SANTA CLARA COUNTY!

It's good to see someone's sense of humanity is still functioning, since the GOP's atrophied long ago.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Wed 16 Jul, 2014 08:26 pm
@MontereyJack,

Quote:
It's good to see someone's sense of humanity is still functioning, since the GOP's atrophied long ago.


The same way the Democrats love of freedom and compromise have?
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Wed 16 Jul, 2014 08:47 pm


Let 'Em In Smile
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Wed 16 Jul, 2014 08:52 pm
@RexRed,
Quote:
Let 'Em In


What does the tattoo on your ass have to do with this?
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Wed 16 Jul, 2014 09:11 pm
Quote:
Senate Bill to Nullify Hobby Lobby Decision Fails: Legislation Falls Four Votes Short of 60


They certainly can pick them. Wasting time and perpetuating a lie. How can Obama talk about the House?

Quote:
In a 56-43 vote, which was largely along party lines, Democrats came up short of the 60 votes needed to advance their legislation. It sought to prevent companies from relying on a religious-freedom law to avoid complying with the Affordable Care Act's requirement to cover all forms of contraception approved by the government without charging workers a copayment.


How come it didn't say no one has to work for those companies? Again Joe Biden and Pelosi said you are not trapped. Those people should simply quit instead of caving to be someone who respects others rights and buys what is not supplied.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3181111/posts?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitter

0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Wed 16 Jul, 2014 10:04 pm
Quote:
Liberals Throw Tantrum Over Loss of Free Stuff



Quote:

Republicans in the Senate blocked a measure that would have undone the Hobby Lobby ruling and forced businesses to provide free abortificant drugs to female employees.

And the lefties threw epic hissy-fits when denied their Free Stuff From the Government; like two year olds in the toy aisle at Wal-Mart, but with less dignity and more f-words.

Why should anyone be forced to pay for someone else’s contraceptives? Because things liberals want (free contraception, marijuana) become mandatory Government entitlements. Things liberals hate (guns, tobacco) become illegal. That’s the way it works in a Democracy. There are no “rights,” just opinions enforced by power.


We are a Republic, don't Democrats realize that?




cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 16 Jul, 2014 10:14 pm
@coldjoint,
You do have **** for brains. Religion should not intrude into people's health insurance/benefit issues.
RexRed
 
  1  
Wed 16 Jul, 2014 10:32 pm
https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/t1.0-9/10460175_10152235594900669_4345071251862964824_n.jpg
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Wed 16 Jul, 2014 11:03 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Religion should not intrude into people's health insurance/benefit issues.


Actually it is the government that has intruded.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Thu 17 Jul, 2014 02:13 am
@parados,
Quote:
If they discharge him then he is no longer subject to military justice


That's not completely correct.
He could still be charged in a military court for crimes committed while he was in the military.
IF, and I admit its a big if. they want to charge him with desertion, the could still do it while he was a civilian.

(I don't think they would however)
parados
 
  2  
Thu 17 Jul, 2014 08:20 am
@mysteryman,
I'm not sure the military agrees with you.

http://www.hqmc.marines.mil/Portals/135/MJFACTSHTS%5B1%5D.html
Quote:
Court-martial jurisdiction is most commonly exercised over active duty personnel. All active duty personnel are subject to the UCMJ and amenable to court-marital jurisdiction throughout their period of active service. Status as an active-duty service member, and hence court-martial jurisdiction over such persons, ordinarily begins with enlistment or commissioning and terminates with the delivery of a valid discharge certificate or separation order.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 17 Jul, 2014 08:22 am
@parados,
A Few Good Men. amen.....
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Thu 17 Jul, 2014 08:59 am
We need to send these border children back home so they can all die in wars started by our corporations... rr (cynical)
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Thu 17 Jul, 2014 09:29 am
https://scontent-a-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/t1.0-9/10341597_294297134072021_8107632419089804867_n.jpg
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Thu 17 Jul, 2014 09:53 am
DOE: Quaker school can discriminate against transgender student
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/doe-grants-religious-exemption-quaker-school-discriminate-transgender-student

This opens the door to government funded, socialist secular schools that deny religious people rights...

Good going Hobby Lobby...

There will come a time when religious people will not be allowed in secular schools and it will be justified on a religious basis..

This SCOTUS Hobby Lobby ruling will one day come back and bite you religious freaks in the behind...

What's good for the goose is good for the gander...
RexRed
 
  1  
Thu 17 Jul, 2014 10:23 am
https://scontent-b-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/t31.0-8/10448547_10152572807174255_2303000062606582479_o.png
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Thu 17 Jul, 2014 10:26 am
@RexRed,
This case has nothing to do with Hobby Lobby, it was decided several months before the announcement of the HL decision. Why are you stating lies and pushing blame where it doesn't belong? One was a decision by the Dept of Education and the other was by the Supreme Court. Maybe you should address your anger at Obama and his DOE for this one.
RexRed
 
  1  
Thu 17 Jul, 2014 10:32 am
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:

This case has nothing to do with Hobby Lobby, it was decided several months before the announcement of the HL decision. Why are you stating lies and pushing blame where it doesn't belong? One was a decision by the Dept of Education and the other was by the Supreme Court. Maybe you should address your anger at Obama and his DOE for this one.


Is it a lie that this person was discriminated against on religious grounds? NO.

So (government funded) secularists schools can ALSO discriminate against the religious "on religious grounds" too...

Once again, THANK YOU HOBBY LOBBY!
Baldimo
 
  1  
Thu 17 Jul, 2014 10:35 am
@RexRed,
It is your representation that is faulty. You are blaming the SCOTUS for a decision they didn't make and had no influence in. You are blaming HL for something they had no part in.

This is no doubt a shitty situation but put the blame where it belongs. The DOE.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 02:15:22