On Voting Republicans Out Of Office

I show concern for the current party in power. Bush isn't currently in power, what good does my concern show now? Can we do anything to change what Bush did? No we can't, so why should I be upset or be concerned about it now. You are now deflecting.

To be honest we still don't know if Obama or anyone directly connected to the White House directed anything. We don't have all the emails yet do we?

Now you are going to play this "what did she do wrong game"? I'll say this, if she did nothing wrong why did she plead the 5th, twice? Why are there so many emails missing from at least 5 different people who would all be involved with said targeting? Why has the IRS not followed the law in regards to important documents and backup procedures? Why was Lerner so concerned with the saving and backups of emails and chat sessions if the IRS and her group were doing nothing wrong?

I guess we will get some answers to some of these questions in the near future. I federal judge has ordered an appearance from someone in the IRS to answer some questions about the "missing" emails and why?

Why are you not upset about the missing emails? According to your statement before, this also makes you a partisan worrier. When the GOP does it, it bothers you. When your party does it, "meh", Bush did it first.

Quote:

Wow... do you always make **** up and think it's factual?

I think conservative donors and groups were intimidated and sworn testimony proves that. Now what isn't factual?

You are saying all those people lied, like the IRS has? Try again Shill

The right lies all the time. Just look at Snopes and Truthorfiction.

Snopes is funded by Soros, their denial and declarations of truth mean ****.

Soros's funding is an urban legend

On March 31, 2010, the day before the Inspector General's report says the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) began its scheme to target tea party and conservative groups, the White House Visitors Log reveals that President Barack Obama met with IRS union boss Colleen Kelley.

NTEU's Kelley has a long history of interaction with the Obama Administration, first meeting in the White House on January 30, 2008, a mere ten days after his first inauguration, which she described:

"We are looking for a return to what we used to call partnership. I don't really care what it's called. For me, it's about collaboration."

Think about it.

IRS union-member employees financed anti-Tea Party candidates, while in their official positions blocked, audited, or intimidated Tea Party and conservative groups and were urged to do so in letters from Senate Democrats Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Tom Udall (D-NM), Al Franken (D-MN), Max Baucus(D-MT, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee which oversees the IRS), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) and Carl Levin (D-MI), as well as Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT).

Now you are going to play this "what did she do wrong game"? I'll say this, if she did nothing wrong why did she plead the 5th, twice? Why are there so many emails missing from at least 5 different people who would all be involved with said targeting?

Why are you not upset about the missing emails? According to your statement before, this also makes you a partisan worrier. When the GOP does it, it bothers you. When your party does it, "meh", Bush did it first.

On March 31, 2010, the day before the Inspector General's report says the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) began its scheme to target tea party and conservative groups, the White House Visitors Log reveals that President Barack Obama met with IRS union boss Colleen Kelley.

Moreover, there is still no evidence of criminality on her part. Further, the Reps can make her talk at any time by granting her immunity from self-incrimination. The Reps don't want to do this because they know they have nothing on her, and this would put a crimp on their efforts to embarrass the administration.

The fact you guys keep bringing up Bush and his missing emails is a joke.