Baldimo
 
  0  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 08:35 am
@parados,
There were contempt charges filed against Lerner. So you can't say no charges have been files.
It's hard to build a case when the IRS is working against you. Emails disappearing, HDD's crashing and the such. Weren't you one of the people who were all upset and George Zimmerman for destroying an IPad that "might" have had video of him being threatening? Didn't you demand that he be arrested for destroying evidence? Yet the IRS blames HDD crashes on the destruction of emails that would point to wrong doing by the govt, and you have no problems with that?

MontereyJack
 
  2  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 09:01 am
@Baldimo,
Baldimo says:
Quote:
Yet the IRS blames HDD crashes on the destruction of emails that would point to wrong doing by the govt, and you have no problems with that?



There is no evidence that the emails WOULD point to wrong doing, there is a possibility that they COULD, but there is also a strong probability that they WOULDN't> We don't know.

Parenthetically, remember that this whole brouhaha is about CHARITABLE tax exemptions, not just plain old exemptions. Anybody who wouldn't question upfront whether anything involving "Tea Party" or Karl Rove was involved directly with politics rather than charity is being so naive it's hard to conceive thay actually exist in the modern world.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 09:10 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:

Baldimo says:
Quote:
Yet the IRS blames HDD crashes on the destruction of emails that would point to wrong doing by the govt, and you have no problems with that?



There is no evidence that the emails WOULD point to wrong doing, there is a possibility that they COULD, but there is also a strong probability that they WOULDN't> We don't know.

Parenthetically, remember that this whole brouhaha is about CHARITABLE tax exemptions, not just plain old exemptions. Anybody who wouldn't question upfront whether anything involving "Tea Party" or Karl Rove was involved directly with politics rather than charity is being so naive it's hard to conceive thay actually exist in the modern world.


BINGO!
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 09:40 am
http://grouchyoldcripple.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/deadbroke2-233x300.jpg

0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 09:51 am
So what's the Republicans' excuse for lying about Benghazi?
Baldimo
 
  0  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 09:54 am
@parados,
Are you suggesting that the head of the IRS is an IT professional? IT is IT. It's pretty basic and the same across most of the US and world. You have Servers, PCs, switches and routers. To think that the IRS works different than any other company in the world when it comes to their IT infrastructure is dishonest. The smallest of companies to the largest of companies work about the same. It doesn't matter. Since you seem to know nothing of IT and how it works, why are you trying to argue this?

You can't even admit that this looks a little funny? Or is it in your best political interest to just go along with what they tell you?
coldjoint
 
  0  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 09:58 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
So what's the Republicans' excuse for lying about Benghazi?


So you are saying the administration is lying. What is their excuse?
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 10:02 am
@Baldimo,
Quote:
Since you seem to know nothing of IT and how it works, why are you trying to argue this?


A shill is paid to argue and lie. Take a look around and you will find countless examples of how little this administration knows about the economy, foreign policy, and enforcing the law.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 10:08 am
joint says:
Quote:
So you are saying the administration is lying. What is their excuse?


How on earth do you derive that from anything I've said? No. I'm saying the Republicans are lying. the administration all along has been far closer to the truth than the Republican fabrications of what they think went on in Benghazi.
coldjoint
 
  1  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 10:12 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Republican fabrications of what they think went on in Benghazi.


Exactly what have they fabricated? The only thing fabricated was the video as an excuse for the attack. Republicans did not do that.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 10:27 am
Quote:
So, Progressives Are the “Friends of the Little Guy”, Eh?




Quote:

The Communist Socialist Leftist “Progressive” end of the political spectrum likes to advertise itself as being the champions of the “little guy”. Progressive politicians love to make a big deal of their “regular guy” roots, and how much their policies supposedly “help” the middle class and below.

So, the recent Administration ‘s policies – nothing if not “Progressive” – must have really helped the “little guy” over the past 5+ years, right? I mean, that’s what they’re supposedly all about: helping the little guy get a “fair deal”.

Turns out that simply doesn’t seem to be the case. In fact, hard data shows that the policies of the current “Progressive” regime has benefited the wealthy to the exclusion of most others – as has been documented by a study conducted by the University of Michigan.

In 2007, the top 5% averaged 16.5 times the wealth of the US median household. So after 5 years of our current regime’s “Progressive” policies, that gap should have narrowed somewhat.

Well, not exactly. Today, the top 5% now have on average 24 times the wealth of the US median household.

It’s even better. Home ownership is down by nearly 6.4%. Over one third of homeowners now cannot afford to sell their home if they want to – either because they owe more than it’s worth, or because they have so little equity it won’t cover closing and a down payment on another home.

The “Great Recession” hurt all Americans. But under the current Progressive Regime, only the wealthy have really recovered. Everyone else is still sucking wind today – bigtime.


So much for any knowledge of the economy.

http://thisainthell.us/blog/?p=52334

0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 10:56 am
http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/images/various_uploads/Poster_Obama_Stalin_Children.jpg
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 11:01 am
joint says:
Quote:
Exactly what have they fabricated? The only thing fabricated was the video as an excuse for the attack. Republicans did not do that


They've fabricated that blaming the video was a fabrication, for one thing. The NYT did what no one else has thought to do. /They went to Libya and actually talked to Libyans that were involved that night. Guess what. Anger at the video, and the demonstrations that went on in Egypt around it and were covered widely on Libyan TV, were in fact a triggering event for the attack on the legation.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 11:02 am
@coldjoint,
stupid and false.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 11:03 am
http://moonbattery.com/graphics/presidents-in-uniform.jpg
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 11:07 am
@coldjoint,
Didn't Reagan PLAY a soldier as an actor, rather than actually being one? (Though he apparently talked about the war movies he'd played in as if they'd actually been real).
And didn't W "defend" Texas and Alabama from invasion by the VietCong? Remember what a treat that was? (If he ever actually showed up to fly his plane, apart from working on a political campaign and partying, which is still in question).
coldjoint
 
  0  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 11:09 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
The NYT


Has its nose up Obamas ass. Anything they claim is tripe and progressive propaganda. That you are stupid enough to believe the Libyan government showed Islamic demonstrations on television is ridiculous. They were installed by the US and would not stoke the fire that way at that time.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 11:10 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
stupid and false.


Take a good look at Common Core and say that.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 11:13 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Reagan PLAY a soldier as an actor,


He also shared the screen with a monkey, who knew that monkey would be the president. Not meant to be too hard on monkeys. They have feelings too.http://www.acidpulse.net/images/smilies/rofl1.gif
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Thu 26 Jun, 2014 11:16 am
@MontereyJack,
This is telling of what you think of the military. You want to mock the service of Bush and Reagan. How long was Obama in the military? Oh that's right he was never in the military. When you see people like Bergdahl as a hero or as serving with honor, it is no wonder you mock Reagan and Bush.

Did you ever serve in the military MJ?

It's also telling when a major news outlet comes forth with FORGED documents days prior to an election to smear someone.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.16 seconds on 01/17/2025 at 05:30:03