On Voting Republicans Out Of Office

So, that little phrase means that any civilians kidnapped by the Taliban are on their own, the govt will do nothing to help them.

Don't try and cloud the issue...

The Republican Party's sole purpose to date is to undermine everything president Barack Obama does and blame him

Watch What You Say
Another despicable effort to chill political speech

This is all part of a broader movement to transform rhetorical opposition to goals of the progressive agenda—from gay marriage or immigration reform or welfare expansion—into condemnable hate speech. Because we must, as Ari Fleischer told us back when free speech was sacred, watch what we say. When you watch what you say, you can’t say much of anything. Not if you’re a conservative. Which is the point.

Tea has not proven to be a good thing for the GOP.

Eric Cantor's Loss - FoxNews Admits It's A Win for Democrats Nationally Long Term

Clinton: Released Taliban Leaders ‘Not a Threat to the United States’

“These five guys are not a threat to the United States,” Clinton said this morning in an interview shown on “Today.” “They are a threat to the safety and security of Afghanistan and Pakistan. It’s up to those two countries to make the decision once and for all that these are threats to them.”

, that's all they got. Talking points.

Poll: Almost 70% of Veterans Say Obama Made Wrong Call on Bergdahl Exchange

This Amendment Could Mean The End Of Free Speech
A significant number of Democratic senators are backing a bill to do just that.

The bill summary, as found on the congressional website, says it is “A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections.” Per the bill, “Congress shall have power to regulate the raising and spending of money and in-kind equivalents with respect to Federal elections, including setting limits on (1) the amount of contributions to candidates for nomination for election to, or for election to, Federal office; and(2) the amount of funds that may be spent by, in support of, or in opposition to such candidates.” Then in appropriate plenipotentiary arrogance, they grant to states the same authority at the state level. And all of this is done under the guise of advancing “the fundamental principle of political equality for all, and to protect the integrity of the legislative and electoral processes.”

But then, so as to not reap the displeasure of their friends in the mainstream media, they have the temerity to declare that “Nothing in this article shall be construed to grant Congress the power to abridge the freedom of the press.” This is not surprising since, according to a new study of the media, released last month, and conducted by two Indiana University journalism professors, four times as many journalists self-identify with the Democrats than those who identify themselves as Republicans. It’s obvious that the senators pushing for this new amendment don’t mind losing a little of George Soros’ money, as long as they still have the mainstream media in their pocket. They apparently feel this is the only way to curtail the influence of people like the Koch brothers, whom Harry Reid has made a nearly daily sport of verbal dribbling on the floor of the Senate.

Scared shitless, aren't they?

like the Koch brothers,

Like Tom Styer. Like George Soros. Like the unions.

like the Koch brothers,

Stupid point you're trying to make.

The idea is to get the Conservative money out of politics