bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Fri 9 May, 2014 10:19 pm
@Baldimo,
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-posts-53-billion-surplus-in-december-2014-01-13?link=MW_pulse

U.S. posts $53 billion surplus in December
Fannie, Freddie payments help largest December surplus on record
Stories You Might Like


By Robert Schroeder, MarketWatch

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The U.S. government recorded a record budget surplus of $53 billion in December, the Treasury Department reported Monday, helping to bring the government’s deficit down 41% in the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

Nearly $40 billion in payments from government-controlled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac contributed to the surplus, the largest on record for the month of December. Tax receipts were also up 5% in the month.

The deficit for October, November and December was $174 billion, $120 billion below the year-ago period, reflecting continued improvement in the economy, increased tax revenue and lower spending.

Bloomberg Enlarge Image
Fannie Mae headquarters

For the first quarter of the year, revenue including individual and corporate taxes rose 8%, to $665 billion.

Spending fell 8% in the same period, reflecting lower outlays on agriculture, defense and other programs.

The last time there was a December surplus was in 2007, of $48 billion.

The federal government’s finances have been steadily improving. In fiscal 2013, which ended Sept. 30, the budget gap dropped to $680 billion, its lowest level in five years. Thanks to record revenues and modestly lower spending, it was the first gap of below $1 trillion of Barack Obama’s presidency.

Washington’s budget wars have cooled down somewhat since House and Senate negotiators reached a deal in December to set spending levels for the next two years.
ECONOMY AND POLITICS | @MKTWEconomics
AFP/Getty Images
Squaring the conflicting remarks on housing from Lew and Yellen
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew and Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen meet each week, but that doesn't mean their messages are always in synch.
• Mortgage servicers draw FSOC scrutiny

However, as of Monday, lawmakers were still racing a Wednesday deadline to finish a massive spending bill for fiscal 2014. Congress is expected to approve a three-day stopgap funding measure to avoid a government shutdown and give lawmakers time to put the finishing touches on the so-called omnibus spending bill.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration and Congress are staring down another looming date: the U.S. debt ceiling is suspended through Feb. 7. The Treasury says that so-called emergency borrowing measures will last only about a month after that, and is urging Congress to raise the debt limit without delay. Republicans have said they will demand concessions for lifting the borrowing limit, but the White House insists it won’t negotiate.


11 July 2013 Last updated at 16:37 ET
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-23280737


The US government reported a budget surplus of $116.5bn (£77.02bn) in June, the most in five years.

The improving US economy meant that tax receipts were higher than expected.

Also, government spending plunged by 47% due to package of spending cuts and tax increases passed in January, know as the sequester.

Government owned mortgage firms, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, added $66.3bn (£43.8bn) in payments. They have been in public ownership since 2008.

Despite that strong month, the Congressional Budget Office forecasts the annual deficit will be $670bn (£443bn) when the budget year ends on Sept. 30.

The US government is once again expected to hit its debt ceiling - the point at which it must borrow more money to pay for ongoing obligations - in the autumn.

The Obama administration must get Congressional approval to raise the limit, which has often proved to be a pivotal point for negotiating future spending deals.

In 2011, the federal government almost shut down as a result of the negotiations and rating agency Standard and Poor's downgraded the US's credit rating from AAA to AA+.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/12/us-budget-surplus-idUSBRE91B1E520130212

U.S. posts $3 billion budget surplus for January

WASHINGTON Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:44pm EST
18 Comments


Analysis & Opinion

What we want to see in Budget 2013
The U.S. must embrace a growth agenda

(Reuters) - The budget posted a surprise surplus in January for the first time in five years, as the Treasury likely benefited from a windfall when payroll tax cuts expired.

The budget registered a $3 billion surplus, the first time there had been a surplus in January since 2008, Treasury Department data showed on Tuesday. Economists had been looking for a $2 billion gap. The surplus compared with a $27 billion deficit in January 2012.

It appeared the Treasury got a boost from the expiration of a payroll tax reduction on January 1 following the last-minute "fiscal cliff" deal. In its estimate last week, the Congressional Budget Office said the Treasury got an extra $9 billion in taxes from the expiry.

The January surplus means the government's cumulative deficit for the fiscal year, which starts in October, is $290 billion, 17 percent lower than the comparable first four months of fiscal 2012.

During fiscal 2012 which ended September 30, the budget deficit totaled $1.089 trillion.

Growth in receipts outpaced rising spending, narrowing the deficit. Receipts grew to $272 billion from $234 billion in the same month last year while outlays rose to $269 billion in January of this year from $262 billion in January 2012. So far in the first four months of fiscal 2013, receipts are $98 billion higher compared to the same period a year ago.

The extra fiscal space should leave the Treasury with plenty of room to stave off default after a debt-limit extension expires on May 19.

Congress on January 31 passed a measure that allows Treasury to borrow sufficiently to meet federal obligations until May 19, at which time another increase in the federal debt limit will be needed.

But even if no increase is granted, Treasury will be able to stave off a final day of reckoning until late July or early August by redeploying emergency cash management measures which allow it to claw back about $220 billion worth of borrowing capacity.

(Reporting by Anna Yukhananov; Editing by Andrea Ricci and James Dalgleish)


There's more - look it up.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Fri 9 May, 2014 10:21 pm
@coldjoint,
You are a liar.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 9 May, 2014 10:24 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
He's not a liar, but an imbecile. I dare say ice brain is the first person I called an imbecile on any forum. He lives it with every post.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Fri 9 May, 2014 10:47 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
first person I called an imbecile on any forum


I wonder why? Was, or is, it the irony?
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Fri 9 May, 2014 11:00 pm
Quote:
All The President’s Bloggers


I have told you about shills. There is an army. The emerging conservatives sites have them sweating bullets. The narrative has and still is theirs. But the tide is going to turn as more and more conservatives and those on the fence realize that lies are not news. They are just lies.

Quote:
But Carney needn’t have worried. He had plenty of backup.

He had The New Republic‘s Brian Beutler dismissing Benghazi as “nonsense.” He had Slate‘s David Weigel, along with The Washington Post’s Plum Line blog, debunking any claim that the new email was a “smoking gun.” Media Matters for America labeled Benghazi a “hoax.” Salon wrote that the GOP had a “demented Benghazi disease.” Daily Kos featured the headline: “Here’s Why the GOP Is Fired Up About Benghazi—and Here’s Why They’re Wrong.” The Huffington Post offered “Three Reasons Why Reviving Benghazi Is Stupid—for the GOP.”

It’s been a familiar pattern since President Obama took office in 2009: When critics attack, the White House can count on a posse of progressive writers to ride to its rescue. Pick an issue, from the Affordable Care Act to Ukraine to the economy to controversies involving the Internal Revenue Service and Benghazi, and you’ll find the same voices again and again, on the Web and on Twitter, giving the president cover while savaging the opposition. And typically doing it with sharper tongues and tighter arguments than the White House itself.


http://legalinsurrection.com/2014/05/all-the-presidents-bloggers/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LegalInsurrection+%28Le%C2%B7gal+In%C2%B7sur%C2%B7rec%C2%B7tion%29
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Sat 10 May, 2014 03:54 am
https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/t1.0-9/10171779_647759525297627_7709316016998370748_n.jpg
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Sat 10 May, 2014 04:00 am
POLL: MILLIONS OF AMERICANS WHO NEED JOBS WANT CONGRESS TO GET TO BOTTOM OF THIS BENGHAZI THING FIRST
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2014/05/poll-millions-of-americans-who-need-jobs-want-congress-to-get-to-bottom-of-this-benghazi-thing-first.html
RexRed
 
  3  
Sat 10 May, 2014 04:59 am
https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1.0-9/10336757_689552524415192_3676505640455411889_n.jpg
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Sat 10 May, 2014 07:23 am
@RexRed,
http://upload.democraticunderground.com/imgs/2014/140509-boehner-dodges-questions-on-gops-benghazi-money-grab.jpg
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Sat 10 May, 2014 07:26 am
@coldjoint,
Its a fact. But how would you know that.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Sat 10 May, 2014 07:27 am
@RexRed,
I've posted it on another thread and they didn't get it.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 10 May, 2014 09:41 am
@bobsal u1553115,
HOw can they 'get it.' They're brain dead. They're more like parrots; repeating lies that they themselves believe to be true without checking out the facts.
Baldimo
 
  1  
Sat 10 May, 2014 11:15 am
@bobsal u1553115,
You were only slightly wrong. They said there was a surplus in Dec 2007. That would have been under Bush and since Clinton was in office.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sat 10 May, 2014 01:05 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
repeating lies

It is the left that repeats the lies. And you know it. This president has lied through out both campaigns and both terms. And you suck it up, justify it, and promote it. I would rather be anything as opposed to you mindless sycophants.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sat 10 May, 2014 01:48 pm
http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/images/Benham_Brothers_LGBT_Finger.png
Advocate
 
  3  
Sat 10 May, 2014 03:02 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
repeating lies

It is the left that repeats the lies. And you know it. This president has lied through out both campaigns and both terms. And you suck it up, justify it, and promote it. I would rather be anything as opposed to you mindless sycophants.


What lies did Obama tell? You mean such lies as:

* he was born in Kenya
* that he is a Muslim
* that the ACA calls for death panels
* that Obama directed IRS to hold up tea party applications
* that Obama is a Commie
* etc.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Sat 10 May, 2014 05:41 pm
@Advocate,
Quote:
* he was born in Kenya
* that he is a Muslim
* that the ACA calls for death panels
* that Obama directed IRS to hold up tea party applications
* that Obama is a Commie


Not proven does not mean they are lies. All of the above might just be proven one day. But you don't see that. In fact, Obama seems to be your Jesus. You can go now and light a candle at your Obama shrine.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Sat 10 May, 2014 06:44 pm
Quote:
Economic Growth Update You Won’t Hear Much About: It Shrunk!

Quote:
It is now looking like the economic growth numbers might be wound down, putting us in negative territory.

Economists now predict gross domestic product will be revised down to a decline of 0.2% to 0.4% in the first quarter. A handful of Wall Street firms trimmed their growth forecasts after Tuesday’s trade report.


Some recovery. Actually the utter failure of the Obama administration. A failed stimulus, job killing regulations, and expansion of entitlements.
This is the new normal liberals want you to accept.

http://www.independentsentinel.com/economic-growth-update-you-wont-hear-much-about-it-shrunk/
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 10 May, 2014 06:45 pm
@coldjoint,
Only idiots like you see Obama as jesus - all from your tainted imagination that always goes nowhere.

It's been proven ad nauseum that Obama is none of those things you listed. Only idiots like you still believe them to be true, but that's also understandable. No brains.

You wouldn't know a legal birth certificate if you saw one; too dumb.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Sat 10 May, 2014 06:50 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
You wouldn't know a legal birth certificate if you saw one; too dumb.


That is what Sheriff Joe said. And Jesus is not the word I would use for a political hack that lies every time he speaks.

You have no room whatsoever to call anyone stupid except the people that think being lied to is normal government behavior. That is how far gone you idiots are.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 8.66 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 01:40:39