@coldjoint,
I'm curious what you think in the emails even warrants impeachment. Have you bothered to follow the link to the emails and look at any of them? I seriously doubt it or you would know there it nothing new in the emails. The only things not blacked out are what the administration released to the public or when someone copied a news report in their email.
Wow... news flash. Someone died in Benghazi is revealed in the emails.
I read joint';s Judicial Watch cite, didn't find anything in it that proved his case, and just now went back and reread it and STILL don't see anything like impeachment in them. The emails are from media and PR people, NOT policy people, NOT Obama, NOT the people who are shaping actual policy, but rather the people who REPORT it and work to put their side in the most favorable light possible so naturally that's what they are talking about. Well, DUH. That's what PR people are paid to do, whether they work for the Obama White House, or the Koch Brothers, or the Republican National Committee. Does not say ANYTHING about what the main thrust of the Obama administration was actually doing, only what the flacks were doing, which is precisely what all flacks, whoever they work for , do.
I mean, really, you think W. Bush, dressed in a flight suit, hops out of a fighter jet that's just landed on the flight deck of an aircraft carrier, to a banner that reads "Mission Accomplished" (which was far, far removed from the truth) was anything but a cheap, blatant PR ploy to try to convince the American people that W was a "strong", "dynamic" leader? Now THAT was pure hype, not Obama.
@coldjoint,
I'm saying there is nothing in the emails that can possible be used for impeachment. However the emails do prove you to be a liar about Benghazi when you say the military should have responded but Obama prevented it.
re Frankapisa:
Yeah, Frank, he did. The carrier was only 30 miles offshore, well within reach of the usual presidential helicopter. But they went for the jet, which was FAR more expensive, but FAR splashier and "macho". Total GOP PR hype, and the taxpayers got the bill.
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
re Frankapisa:
Yeah, Frank, he did. The carrier was only 30 miles offshore, well within reach of the usual presidential helicopter. But they went for the jet, which was FAR more expensive, but FAR splashier and "macho". Total GOP PR hype, and the taxpayers got the bill.
Wow!~
Well...except for the expense...I gotta give Bush credit. You'd have to knock me out and handcuff me to get into a jet that is gonna land on an aircraft carrier
But his father also did something I would never do. Jump out of an airplane with a parachute...on purpose!
@coldjoint,
We realize you don't believe half of what happens in the real world.
The emails prove you to be a liar long before they make Obama one. The emails are real time responses while the attack is going on. The emails are discussions of the response during the attacks. They prove your version of events is a lie.
@coldjoint,
The Pink Prevaricator wrote:
Quote:The emails are discussions of the response during the attacks.
So why the attack was going on they were concerned about "Prep For Susan" on her round on Sunday news shows. Try again loser.
Wow. Is that the best you can do?
The emails cover a time frame from Sept 11, 2012 to Sept 27, 2012. There are 41 documents. Only two of the 41 seem to cover the prep for Susan Rice's Sunday appearance. That means there are 39 other emails. Some of them are from Sept 11.
The documents include transcripts of public statements by McCain, Boehner, Graham and others. The interesting thing about the Congressional statements is they never refer to it as a terrorist attack.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/1919_production-4-17-14.pdf#page=14
Keep it up, Pinkie. You are showing how you don't know your ass from your head
@coldjoint,
Wow. You do like to show your ignorance.
The protests referred to are in Yemen, Egypt, Tunisia and other countries.
If only you had taken the time to read the actual emails. But why bother when you can come here and give people the choice of being a crazy far right loonie that is out of touch with reality or a liberal.
Frank is right. You are the best thing going for liberalism.
Let me post the link again so anyone else can compare your claims to the actual emails.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/1919_production-4-17-14.pdf#page=14
@coldjoint,
What happened to rules about not having to disclose?