On Voting Republicans Out Of Office

Get off the racist ****. And show me proof of that law. the last one you showed me you lied about.

Or is there another reason?

Where does that law say you are responsible for your parents debt?

Some responsible people think so, cj.

Where does that law say you are responsible for your parents debt? You have to remember, I am not a shill with talking points and links at my disposal.

And now, they won’t be able to use the bathroom.

Quote:

And now, they won’t be able to use the bathroom.

Republicans don't piss? You are a fool.

Both were laws.

SENATE REPORTS: No. 110-220 accompanying S. 2302 (Comm. on Agriculture,
Nutrition, and Forestry).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
May 22, considered and passed House.
June 5, considered and passed Senate.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 44 (2008):
June 18, Presidential veto message.
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
June 18, House and Senate overrode veto.

while wiping their behind...

The politically correct wolf in polite sheep’s clothing

Political correctness is, at its core, a way to paint the world in terms that don’t tell the whole story. It shifts words around to make sure there are victims or dangers depending on the needs of the narrative. PC keeps opponents off balance. To randomly forbid certain words as derogatory makes good-hearted people reluctant to enter a discussion, so they’re effectively silenced through intimidation. A good person is not out to offend, and thus goes along with the change in his or her lexicon in order to remain polite.

The proponents of PC claim that it curtails the negativity directed toward a certain group or action. This is a myth. Like the terms it creates, political correctness isn’t what it claims to be.

PC does not stop hatred. It doesn’t change any minds. Inwardly, people will maintain their opinion. What it does is create sacred cows. It attempts to paint the subject at hand as a topic that needs to be handled with care. It must be discussed with caution, if not reverence.

In the end, political correctness lends help to no group. If we’re changing the terms by which a person, place or thing is defined because there are bad apples out there that wish to use words harmfully, then we’re not so much empowering the hated as we are the hater. The cycle of using words derogatorily will continue no matter the polite language you drag it through, and the term that was created to be “polite” will have to be painted as wrong to make way for a new term.

Freedom of speech is a liberty that the Right often defends vigorously, but if we allow the Left to define what constitutes socially usable words, we’re not defending it well enough.