@parados,
parados wrote:Since the fraud is less than .0004%, I see no reason to restrict voting.
Which is the point. Voter fraud is not a problem in America, so any action that purports to fix a non-existent problem has an ulterior motive. There was a report on Radio 4 a while back where elderly African American voters were being interviewed, they were under no illusions that this was an attack on their democratic rights. This is something that claims to stop fraud, but does the opposite, it disenfranchises people, in order to swing elections. It's highly undemocratic.
Why not spend the money on fixing a real problem, like America's crumbling infrastructure?