@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:Well, apparently someone did compare them...
Which is part of your problem.
There is a show called 'Modern Marvels' that did a documentary pre-911 show casing the world trade center construction. The entire show is on youtube, it is an hour and twenty six minute show that was re-aired after 911 happened as a memorial.
You don't have to watch the entire thing but there is some interesting information at 0:33:00 to 0:35:00 that explain design of skyscrapers. You can check the before and after segments of the show to see if I am taking anything out of context. However; it specifically states that the design of the world trade center was not the "usual" or "typical" design style.
Reference the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SY-kH9lJmeI&feature=g-vrec
Watch the whole thing if interested. If not check out specifically parts starting at 0:33:00 to 0:35:00 which is only two minutes of the entire video.
This is important information when go about comparing how buildings will behave in a fire. If you try to use a "typical" design which is the "box" style to that of the world trade center, you can't because the structure is not built the same way.
So your argument suggests that "steel" buildings are all designed the same way therefore all should behave the same way in fires. It is simply not reality to suggest that both designs would end up with the same conclusion. It is far from scientific to make such an accretion. Let alone take your information from a "truther" who wants to promote an idea that there is some conspiracy.