Craven de Kere wrote:Frank, you are using a limited definition. And you are wrong.
MW wrote:
probable
1 : supported by evidence strong enough to establish presumption but not proof <a probable hypothesis>
2 : establishing a probability <probable evidence>
3 : likely to be or become true or real <probable events>
You are using definition number 1.
Definition number 3 can be modified.
Some things are more likely than others, and probability is not binary in nature.
Craven, if a thing is "likely to be or become true or real" it is probable.
If event "a" is more likely than event "b" -- and both are at least 50% likely, then both are probable.
One is not more probable than the other -- although one may be more likely than the other.
Although everyone uses "more probable" (I know I occasionally do) -- the fact is in a strict sense, that useage is incorrect. A thing "a" may be more likely than a thing "b" -- but once we have established that "a" and "b" are probable -- it really is erroneous to consider one to be more probable.
It's like someone mentioned -- pregnant. A woman is either pregnant or not pregnant -- and how long into term she is does not make her more pregnant or less pregnant.
The correct term should be that it is more likely.
Sorry, but you are the one who is wrong here.