From what you mentioned, say if I block you, not only can't I see any of your post, but you
can't see any of my posts. That is what doesn't make sense, because it seems to serve no purpose other than spite. There is no point for such reciprocated
obstruction is what I'm trying to get at - basically, involuntary censorship.
Am I understanding this correctly? (Your conference call/ wiretapper analogy is pretty bad analogy when comparing to an open forum)
Even if you're blocked, don't you want to have the freedom to see what your blocker is writing in an open forum? Personally, I'd like to have that freedom.