@McTag,
Quote:Thank you, I didn't miss it. And I didn't miss the fact that it was from Yahoo which suggests, crap, I have quoted to you. in support of my argument, from the Shorter Oxford dictionary and you dismissed this with an airy "the boys make mistakes". And then you comment about the honesty of others.
Whoa! What have you done with that honest ole McTag?
Anyone can buy a dictionary company, McTag? That Yahoo is the
American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language.
Now speaking of honesty, you haven't even mentioned the two other entries I provided, it could have been more but I chose just the BrE entries so as to not overwhelm.
I pointed up a rather serious error that the Shorter, and I strongly expect the Longer, Oxford has made. If they can make centuries long errors concerning something as dumb as split infinitives, it's not at all impossible for them to make other errors.
And indeed, in the same entry we saw that they had. Once more, make a sentence wherein you use 'might' as the past tense of 'may', my honest, not so young but vibrant nevertheless, friend.
Quote:I pointed out shortcomings in your spelling and you witter on about allowing your dialect. Honesty?
You were in error on those, completely. I showed you why and you, dishonestly avoided that.
I asked some posts ago if this was the dismal route you wanted to take, no reply.
Quote:That Yahoo vs. the Oxford dictionary thing is a little bit like a guy from Louisiana contacting the Academie Francaise with suggestions about how they might amend their French.
It might cause some amusement, but will not be too convincing.
I left the Oxford thing for you to expand upon. No expansion, just tangents, silly tangents. Why not discuss Oxford's stance with your opinions on same?
I also pointed out to you on the deontic [social] modal uses mirror the relative strong/weak epistemic uses of may and might.
No reply from you. That's dishonest.
Quote:
What shall we say about your might/ may argument, for clarity's sake?
That "may" represents 51% probability?
"Might" represents what, 47.5%?
What do you think? Americans like statistics. Put some numbers on, do.
Think of the modal range, McTag and you'll see that your
That "may" represents 51% probability?
simply can't work, following logic and something you're big on, the strict meaning of words.
Think about how we use these modals/semi-modals. It's not always a flat, monotone 'may' or 'might' or 'must' or 'almost certainly + verb' or 'probably + verb'
Why didn't you quote from your Oxford? Is this what your 'shorter' said?
Quote:Usage
Traditionalists insist that one should distinguish between may (present tense) and might (past tense) in expressing possibility: I may have some dessert if I'm still hungry; she might have known her killer. However , this distinction is rarely observed today, and may and might are generally acceptable in either case: she may have visited yesterday; I might go and have a cup of tea.
http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_gb0506140?rskey=HiBWcy&result=3#m_en_gb0506140