@spendius,
I might say that it was the post where I tried to give The Bible back to those unfortunates who have had it stolen from them by teachers in public schools for reasons I have already covered.
No doubt I will have to cover them again. But not here. Evolution threads are the right place for distasteful subject matter. Look how distasteful pom felt my simple explanation of elementary eugenics to be. And I was using metaphor too. The scientific eugenicist, the obvious outcome of your educational project, would not be able to understand that my definition of elementary eugenics was a joke. It actually covered the real advanced stuff or, to be more exact, examples of where it takes place. I was only kidding about it being elementary for people I know can't understand why it's advanced and it's the scientific shite that's elementary. To save their face. One needs to know who one is talking to before one speaks without reservations. Those who live in the Dawkinsian world of evolution minus the grubby bits are the ones one needs to be most reserved with. Of either sex.
I'm not having it that microscopes, tissue typing, liquid nitrogen freezing, slow thaws, petri dishes, pipettes and injectors are remotely capable of outwitting ladies. Especially young ones. One might not be able to explain evolution otherwise. Or literature.
That's why I think eugenicists when you have brought them forth into flowering will be an unmitigated disaster. I prefer the Pope's method of starched cotton dresses in Eastertime services. They know what they are doing. They've had enough practice.
