@sahanley,
sahanley wrote:
Did you ever think it might be all these "safety nets" we have in place that encourage people to be irresponsible with their actions? If people knew they would have to own up to their own behavior they wouldn't do it in the first place.
It doesn't really matter what I think about this.
It is not my position to be a member of the morality police.
My comment was quite simple and straightforward.
I'll ask it directly to you again....
Would you rather pay for condoms, birth control pills, implants etc., OR would you rather pay for the child and mother through welfare for years?
People are not going to stop having sex, and you or I are not present at the moment people initiate sex to tell them they are being irresponsible.
To answer the question posed in the title of this thread;
If someone is against abortion, they should be willing to contribute to the cost of making reliable birth control available, rather than have the financial burden thousands of times greater forced on them via direct costs and the cost in terms other than dollars, to society.
Again, my direct question to you is, would you rather pay for condoms, or the welfare, medicaid, the cost of their education, etc etc etc.?
If you answer you would rather not pay for either, you've got your head in the sand.