THE US, THE UN AND IRAQ VI

Herald (Glasgow, Scotland), December 28, 1999.


Iraq tempts bin Laden to attack West
Exclusive. By: Ian Bruce, Geopolitics Editor.

THE world's most wanted man, Osama bin Laden, has been offered sanctuary in Iraq if his worldwide terrorist network succeeds in carrying out a campaign of high-profile attacks on the WestÝ ...


Now we are also facing the prospect of an unholy alliance between bin Laden and Saddam. The implications are terrifying.


"We might be looking at the most wanted man on the FBI's target list gaining access to chemical, biological or even nuclear weapons courtesy of Iraq's clandestine research programmes."


The U.S. intelligence community has been squeezing bin Laden's finances steadily for several years. His personal fortune of anything up to £500m has been whittled down to single figures ...


- - - - -


U.S. Newswire, December 23, 1999.


Terrorism Expert Reveals Why Osama bin Laden has Declared War On America; Available for Comment in Light of Predicted Attacks.


... (author Yossef) Bodansky also reveals the relationship between bin Laden and Saddam Hussein and how the U.S. bombing of Iraq is "strengthening the hands of militant Islamists eager to translate their rage into violence and terrorism."Ý ....


- - - - -


The Observer. December 19, 1999.


Sanctions reviewed in West as Saddam wields sword of Islam


The Iraqi dictator has rejected a UN deal to lift sanctions. The Western blockade, far from toppling the regime, has bolstered it. He's ditched the sunglasses and taken up the Koran to harness the fervour ofÝ fundamentalists.


By: Jason Burke, in Baghdad


... This time last year the U.S. claimed that another delegation had met Osama bin Laden, the alleged terrorist mastermind and tried to woo him to Iraq.


Senior officials claim that the Islamisation programme is an attempt to defuse the threat of Islamic militancy rather than encourage it ...


- - - - -


United Press International. November 3, 1999, Wednesday, BC cycle.


WASHINGTON -- The U.S. government has tried to prevent accused terror suspect Osama bin Laden from fleeing Afghanistan to either Iraq or Chechnya, Michael Sheehan, head of counter-terrorism at the State Department, told a Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee ...


- - - - -


Akron Beacon Journal (Ohio). October 31, 1999. Sunday 1 STAR EDITION.


BIN LADEN SPOTTED AFTER OFFER TO LEAVE
By: From Beacon Journal wire services


DATELINE: JALALABAD, AFGHANISTAN:


... The Taliban has since made it known through official channels that the likely destination is Iraq.


A Clinton administration official said bin Laden's request "falls far short" of the UN resolution that the Taliban deliver him for trial....


- - - - -


The Kansas City Star. March 2, 1999, Tuesday.


International terrorism, a conflict without boundaries


By Rich Hood


... He (bin Laden)Ýhas a private fortune ranging from $250 million to $500 million and is said to be cultivating a new alliance with Iraq's Saddam Hussein, who has biological and chemical weapons bin Laden would not hesitate to use. An alliance between bin Laden and Saddam Hussein could be deadly. Both men are united in their hatred for the United States and any country friendly to the United States....


- - - - -


Los Angeles Times. February 23, 1999, Tuesday, Home Edition.
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 6; Letters Desk.
HEADLINE: OSAMA BIN LADEN


Where is Osama bin Laden (Feb. 14)? That should be the U.S.'s main priority. If as rumored he and Saddam Hussein are joining forces, it could pose a threat making Hitler and Mussolini seem like a sideshow....


- - - - -


National Public Radio (NPR)
MORNING EDITION (10:00 AM on ET)
February 18, 1999.


THOUGH AFGHANISTAN HAS PROVIDED OSAMA BIN LADEN WITH SANCTUARY, IT IS UNCLEAR WHERE HE IS NOW.
ANCHORS: BOB EDWARDS
REPORTERS: MIKE SHUSTER


... There have also been reports in recent months that bin Laden might have been considering moving his operations to Iraq. Intelligence agencies in several nations are looking into that. According to Vincent Cannistraro, a former chief of CIA counterterrorism operations, a senior Iraqi intelligence official, Farouk Hijazi(ph), sought out bin Laden in December and invited him to come to Iraq.


Mr. VINCENT CANNISTRARO (Former Chief of CIA Counterterrorism Operations): Farouk Hijazi, who was the Iraqi ambassador in Turkey ... known through sources in Afghanistan, members of Osama's entourage let it be known that the meeting had taken place.


SHUSTER: Iraq's contacts with bin Laden go back some years, to at least 1994, when, according to one U.S. government source, Hijazi met him when bin Laden lived in Sudan. According to Cannistraro, Iraq invited bin Laden to live in Baghdad to be nearer to potential targets of terrorist attack in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. There is a wide gap between bin Laden's fundamentalism and Saddam Hussein's secular dictatorship. But some experts believe bin Laden might be tempted to live in Iraq because of his reported desire to obtain chemical or biological weapons. CIA director George Tenet referred to that in recent testimony....


- - - - -


Agence France Presse. February 17, 1999.


Saddam plans to use bin Laden against Kuwait, Saudi: opposition


Iraq's President Saddam Hussein plans to use alleged terrorist Osama bin Laden's network to carry out his threats against Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, an Iraqi opposition figure charged on Wednesday.
"If the ... Jaber, a member of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI), said Iraq had "offered to shelter bin Laden under the precondition that he carry out strikes on targets in neighbouring countries."


... Islamic fundamentalist bin Laden, who has gone missing from his base in Afghanistan, would never seek refuge in secular Iraq on ideological grounds. "I think bin Laden would keep quiet or fight to the death rather than seek asylum in Iraq," the London-based dissident, who asked not to be named, told AFP last week.....


- - - - -


Deutsche Presse-Agentur. February 17, 1999, Wednesday, BC Cycle


Opposition group says bin Laden in Iraq


DATELINE: Kuwait City


An Iraqi opposition group claimed in a published report Wednesday that Islamic militant Osama bin Laden is in Iraq from where he plans to launch a campaign of terrorism against Baghdad's Gulf neighbours.


The claim was made by Bayan Jabor, spokesman for the Teheran-based Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI).


Bin Laden "recently settled in Iraq at the invitation of Saddam Hussein in exchange for directing strikes against targets in neighbouring countries," Jabor told the Kuwaiti newspaper al-Rai al- Aam ... Taleban leaders in Afghanistan, where he had been living, said they lost track of him. Media reports have speculated he sought refuge in Chechnya, Somalia, Iraq, or with a non-Taliban group in Afghanistan.


Jabor, who was interviewed in Damascus, Syria, said Iraq began extending invitations to bin Laden six months ago, shortly after the United States bombed his suspected terrorist training camps in Afghanistan after linking him with the August 7 bombings of U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and in Dar-es-Salam, Tanzania.


The United States indicted Bin Laden for the embassy bombings and has offered a five million dollar reward for information leading to his capture. Bin Laden's disappearance has coincided with stepped up threats by Iraq against neighbours Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Turkey for allowing the United States and Britain to use their air bases to carry out air patrols over two "no-fly" zones over northern and southern Iraq ....


- - - - -


Associated Press Worldstream. February 14, 1999.


Taliban leader says whereabouts of bin Laden unknown


... Analysts say bin Laden's options for asylum are limited.


Iraq was considered a possible destination because bin Laden had received an invitation from Iraqi President Saddam Hussein last month. And Somalia was a third possible destination because of its anarchy and violent anti-U.S. historyÝ....


- - - - -


San Jose Mercury News (California).Ý February 14, 1999 Sunday MORNING FINAL EDITION


U.S. WORRIED ABOUT IRAQI, BIN LADEN TIES TERRORIST COULD GAIN EVEN
DEADLIER WEAPONS


U.S. intelligence officials are worried that a burgeoning alliance between terrorist leader Osama bin Laden and Iraqi President Saddam Hussein could make the fugitive Saudi's loose-knit organization much more dangerous ...


In addition, the officials said, Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal is now in Iraq, as is aÝrenowned Palestinian bomb designer, and both could make their expertise available to bin Laden.


"It's clear the Iraqis would like to have bin Laden in Iraq," said Vincent Cannistraro, a former head of counterterrorism operations at the Central Intelligence AgencyÝ ...


Saddam has even offered asylum to bin Laden, who has expressed support for Iraq.


... (in) late December, when bin Laden met a senior Iraqi intelligence official near Qandahar, Afghanistan, there has been increasing evidence that bin Laden and Iraq may have begun cooperating in planning attacks against American and British targets around the world.


Bin Laden, who strikes in the name of Islam, and Saddam, one of the most secular rulers in the Arab world, have little in common except their hatred of the United States ...


More worrisome, the American officials said, are indications that there may be contacts between bin Laden's organization and Iraq's Special Security Organization (SSO), run by Saddam's son Qusay. Both the SSO and the Mukhabarat were involved in a failed 1993 plot to assassinate former President George Bush ...


"The idea that the same people who are hiding Saddam's biological weapons may be meeting with Osama bin Laden is not a happy one," said one American official....


- - - - -


Associated Press Worldstream. February 13, 1999; Saturday 14:32 Eastern Time


Bin Laden said to have left Afghanistan, whereabouts unknown


... It is very unlikely bin Laden could remain in Afghanistan without Taliban officials knowing his whereabouts.


Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has offered asylum to bin Laden, who has expressed support for Iraq.


U.S. officials believe bin Laden masterminded the Aug. 7 bombings of its embassies in Kenya and Tanzania ...


Bin Laden urged devout Muslims to attack U.S. and British interests in retaliation for their joint assault on Iraq.


U.S. officials demanded that the Taliban hand over bin Laden, who has been indicted in a U.S. court on murder charges in connection with the bombings. But the Taliban had refused.


- - - - -


The Bulletin's Frontrunner. January 4, 1999, Monday.


Defiant Saddam Looks To Provoke U.S.


... Time also reported, "For now, the White House will respond to each provocation by counterattacking the offending battery."


Saddam Reaching Out To bin Laden.


Newsweek (1/11, Contreras) reported, "U.S. sources say (Saddam) is reaching out to Islamic terrorists, including some who may be linked to Osama bin Laden." ...


(Osama bin Laden was) calling for all-out war on Americans, using as his main pretext Washington's role in bombing and boycotting Iraq." In a Newsweek interview, bin Laden said that "'any American who pays taxes to hisÝ government," is a legitimate target." Newsweek reported, "The idea of an alliance between Iraq and bin Laden is alarming to the West," although "Saddam may think he's too good for such an association." However, "Now that the United States has made his removal from office a national objective....


- - - - -


The White House Bulletin. Copyright 1999. Bulletin Broadfaxing Network, Inc.


In a Newsweek interview, bin Laden said that "'any American who pays taxes to his government," is a legitimate target." Newsweek reported, "The idea of an alliance between Iraq and bin Laden is alarming to the West," although "Saddam may think he's too good for such an association." However, "Now that the United States has made his removal from office a national objective, he....


- - - - -


United Press International. January 3, 1999, Sunday, BC cycle.


UPI Focus: Bin Laden 'instigated' embassy bombings


... (The Taliban) government in Afghanistan says the Saudi does not have the money to finance projects in the country. Newsweek also reported that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein has been making new overtures to bin Laden in an attempt to rebuild his intelligence network and to create his own terror network....

MR. LEHMAN: Well, I really totally disagree with what I thought was outrageously irresponsible journalism, to portray what the staff statement--and again, this is a staff statement; the commissioners have not addressed this issue yet--to portray it as contradicting what the administration said. There's really very little difference between what our staff found, what the administration is saying today and what the Clinton administration said. The Clinton administration portrayed the relationship between al- Qaeda and Saddam's intelligence services as one of cooperating in weapons development. There's abundant evidence of that. In fact, as you'll soon hear from Joe Klein, President Clinton justified his strike on the Sudan "pharmaceutical" site because it was thought to be manufacturing VX gas with the help of the Iraqi intelligence service.

Since then, that's been validated. There has been traces of Empta that comes straight from Iraq, and this confounds the Republicans, who accused Clinton of doing it for political purposes. But it confirms the cooperative relationship, which were the words of the Clinton administration, between al-Qaeda and Iraqi intelligence.

The Bush administration has never said that they participated in the 9/11 attack. They've said, and our staff has confirmed, there have been numerous contacts between Iraqi intelligence and al-Qaeda over a period of 10 years, at least. And now there's new intelligence, and this has come since our staff report has been written because, as you know, new intelligence is coming in steadily from the interrogations in Guantanamo and in Iraq and from captured documents. And some of these documents indicate that there is at least one officer of Saddam's Fedayeen, a lieutenant colonel, who was a very prominent member of al-Qaeda. That still has to be confirmed. But the vice president was right when he said that he may have things that we don't yet have. And we are now in the process of getting this latest intelligence.

The Liberal - Al Qaeda Link

Written by Bob Parks
Monday, June 21, 2004


Judging by the title of the column, I think you may have an idea of where I'm going with this. Liberals will take this as a personal attack. Oh well….

Like those espoused by Howard Dean, my argument is also circumstantial. American liberal conduct illustrates an intentional disregard for the traditional politics-ending-at-the-water's-edge protocol. Not a good position to take when our men and women beyond the water's edge are in war zones. The very talking points liberals make are being used by our enemy as justification for the sloppy beheading of American civilians, among other things.

Kidnap victims Nicholas Berg and Paul Johnson were both killed and the reasoning cited was the humiliation of Arab prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison. Both Al Qaeda and ''Democracy Now!'' liberals equate the cold-blooded murder of thousands of innocent civilians worldwide with hurting the feelings of a couple hundred captured Islamic terrorists.

Now what may al Qaeda and American liberals have in common?

Both hate our capitalist society except when they personally benefit. They both hate President Bush and want to see him defeated in November. Al Qaeda hates him because, unlike a liberal president who would probably leave them to their own devices, Bush wants them all dead. It must be hard to sleep at night when you know the President of the United States has taken a hit out on you.

Unlike other religions that liberals have successfully removed from public venues, Islam has been exempted. Is it out of respect for that particular religion, or do the rumors of possible violence scare them into true ''tolerance?'' Who knows? But while al Qaeda worships the leadership of Osama bin Laden, liberals here consider him a more misguided, yet sympathetic figure, trained and inadvertently unleashed on the world by U.S. intelligence.

The latest tactic being used by the American left is the repeated mantra that Bush misled the American people and the world into war by stating unequivocally that there was a relationship between Iraqi president Saddam Hussein and the al Qaeda terror network. That assertion was the impetus for the war on Iraq.

If one looks back, it would seem a lot of people came to that conclusion long ago. That conclusion doesn't serve the Democrat presidential election machine well, so certain recollections need not be brought up.

''ABC News has learned that in December, an Iraqi intelligence chief, named Farouk Hijazi, now Iraq's ambassador to Turkey, made a secret trip to Afghanistan to meet with bin Laden. Three intelligence agencies tell ABC News they cannot be certain what was discussed, but almost certainly, they say, bin Laden has been told he would be welcome in Baghdad.'' - Sheila MacVicar, ABC News, January 14, 1999

In quintessential American tradition, the attempt to find blame has led to a commission seeking answers as to why 9/11 happened. With the exception of Bush administration personnel, few on the left and in the media have reached the simple conclusion that the Tower and Pentagon attacks were carried out by very bad people.

Despite plants inserted on the panel to insure no past or present administration was blamed directly, one of the first of many conclusions issued was that we were caught with our pants down on September 11. Also determined was that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was assisting al Qaeda on other sinister projects.

Now while al Qaeda hoped this commission would provide them with valuable information as to our logistical, intelligence, and military weaknesses, unfortunately we'll see in the very near future just how valuable these hearings were to them.

Both American liberals and al Qaeda hope the hearings will provide political ammunition that will damage Bush. They assert Bush lied about a relationship between Saddam and bin Laden, and subsequently conducted an unnecessary and illegal war.

The commission released some findings on Thursday, June 17. The commission's conclusion backed up Bush's claim that Iraq and al Qaeda were essentially allies.

But the response from American liberals was true to form.

''Panel Finds No Qaeda-Iraq Plot Tie'' - New York Times headline, June 17

The correction was almost immediate.

''The President's correct. And the commission yesterday said exactly that. What the commission also said was there was no evidence of collaboration on any of the attacks against the United States. But we had previously pointed out that, particularly in Sudan, there is very hard evidence of collaboration on the X gas and other evidence, and additional contacts between Saddam's intelligence service and al Qaeda in the assistance in training in weapons, chemical and biological weapons, anthrax manufacture, and that's what we had in our report yesterday, but unfortunately, the New York Times sort of highlighted only one half of that.'' - Former Navy Secretary John Lehman, CNN's June 17 "Inside Politics"

This is a battle for power.

Al Qaeda wants us dead and gone while liberals want their power back. The terrorists have no problem concealing the truth and offering up propaganda for their simple masses to consume. Liberals shamelessly do the same.

''Now that the 9/11 Commission has said that there is no evidence to support a collaborative effort--relationship between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, the president has a responsibility to the American people to speak truth on this subject." - House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, CNN's June 17 "Inside Politics"

Of course, Pelosi is deliberately misleading the public (she probably considers simple as well) herself with that comment.

Liberals, like al Qaeda, don't like their positions being challenged. For example, Fox News is vilified for being an ''extreme right'' mouthpiece simply because all sides of an argument are heard. Shows like ''Democracy Now!'' allow no point of view that disputes their own conclusions.

Al Qaeda will just kill you.

Terrorists recruit children to be suicide bombers; the left indoctrinates American children under the guise of ''education'' and encourages activism. Have you ever wondered who motivated the violent, domestic terror group ELF (Earth Liberation Front)?

So when the 9/11 commission members themselves dispute the conclusion disseminated by the American media and declare there was a long-standing relationship between the Iraqi government (Saddam Hussein) and al Qaeda, it doesn't deter the left from repeating their false political accusations on Bush and America.

And have you noticed the terrorists themselves aren't denying it?

''I must say I have trouble understanding the flap over this. The vice president is saying, I think, that there were connections between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein's government. We don't disagree with that. So it seems to me that the sharp differences that the press has drawn, the media has drawn, are not that apparent to me.'' - 9/11 Commission Democrat Vice Chairman Lee Hamilton

Even Russian President Vladimir Putin stated years ago there was a link between Iraq and al Qaeda. Yet the left marches on.

''President Bush refuses to dismiss, one day after the 9/11 commission threw more cold water on the idea of an Iraq-al Qaeda connection. The Bush administration may keep insisting there was a relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda. But some top Democrats don't seem to be buying it. Today, Bush rival John Kerry again accused the president of misleading Americans when he made the case for war in Iraq.'' - Judy Woodruff, CNN's ''Inside Politics''

The left marches on.

''There continues to be a discrepancy between the commission's findings and the president's on whether al-Qaeda has a link to Saddam Hussein.'' - Peter Jennings, World News Tonight

And the left marches on.

''The commission yesterday said it had found no credible evidence of a quote, 'collaborative relationship' between al-Qaeda and Iraq--no plotting together against the United States.'' - Dan Rather, CBS Evening News

And the left marches on.

''But despite that conclusion, President Bush insisted there was a relationship between the two.'' - Tom Brokaw, NBC Nightly News

And the left marches on.

''Everything's been built on lies. Everything! I mean the entire pre-text for war.'' - Meredith Vieira, CBS News/ABC News veteran, ''The View''

And the left marches on.

''Etymologists have the Clinton years to thank for bringing to our attention what the definition of 'is' is. At the Bush White House, meanwhile, it looks like some parsing of the word 'connection' is in order, as in, 'Is there a connection between Iraq and al-Qaeda or not?' On this delicate and divisive matter, we heard from the president once again today, once again asserting that the 9/11 Commission doesn't know its Iraq from its elbow.'' - Keith Olbermann, MSNBC's "Countdown"

I firmly believe the American left will do anything to defeat conservative America, as is the ironic goal of al Qaeda.

Experience tells them that liberals, whether they are in New Paultz or Madrid, will change the government to one accepting of the al Qaeda line (and basically retreat from the War on Terror) with the slightest shove.

Conservatives have that ''bring ?'em on'' attitude when it comes to people who believe their way of life is better than ours and the regime change is to be conducted by any means necessary.

If there is any link between American liberals and al Qaeda, it should be as obvious to you as it is to me.

"If Americans are in danger, if there's a really bad person we've got to go after, it's the same old rules," Wolfowitz told reporters traveling with him, making clear that U.S. forces had no intention of withdrawing from the fight. "But we would like people to see that something has changed. In the first few weeks, a lot of the challenge is how to create some optics when the underlying substance hasn't changed that much."

GUANTÁNAMO BAY, Cuba, June 19 ?- For nearly two and a half years, American officials have maintained that locked within the steel-mesh cells of the military prison here are some of the world's most dangerous terrorists ?- "the worst of a very bad lot," Vice President Dick Cheney has called them.

The officials say information gleaned from the detainees has exposed terrorist cells, thwarted planned attacks and revealed vital intelligence about Al Qaeda. The secrets they hold and the threats they pose justify holding them indefinitely without charge, Bush administration officials have said.

But as the Supreme Court prepares to rule on the legal status of the 595 men imprisoned here, an examination by The New York Times has found that government and military officials have repeatedly exaggerated both the danger the detainees posed and the intelligence they have provided.

In interviews, dozens of high-level military, intelligence and law-enforcement officials in the United States, Europe and the Middle East said that contrary to the repeated assertions of senior administration officials, none of the detainees at the United States Naval Base at Guantánamo Bay ranked as leaders or senior operatives of Al Qaeda. They said only a relative handful ?- some put the number at about a dozen, others more than two dozen ?- were sworn Qaeda members or other militants able to elucidate the organization's inner workings.

It's a bit rich when the right accuses others of harbouring hatred. As if they had never heard of the Starr investigations, for example.

Most right-thinking Americans, it seems to me, recognise that this administration has dragged America to the lowest moral point in its history.

For this they blame the figurehead, equally with the puppetmasters. I hope justice will yet prevail.

... I would not be surprised at all if it turned out the Clinton's leaked Monica and Starr received a handsome reward for his part in the focus deflection (just my pet theory) ...

... Before September the 11th, many in the world believed that Saddam Hussein could be contained. But chemical agents, lethal viruses and shadowy terrorist networks are not easily contained. Imagine those 19 hijackers with other weapons and other plans -- this time armed by Saddam Hussein. It would take one vial, one canister, one crate slipped into this country to bring a day of horror like none we have ever known. We will do everything in our power to make sure that that day never comes. (Applause.)

Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option ...

G.W. Bush; 2003 State of the Union Address

... you'll understand where I stand.