McGentrix wrote:So far all responses have shied away from addressing any of the points I have that CLEARLY shows that there is indeed a link between Iraq and al Qaeda.
Why is that you guys can't defend the statements that your side keeps making?
I like you...not in the sense that my heart goes pitter-pat whenever I see a post from you...but in that I expect we'd get on just fine in any number of circustances.
But you are in trouble on this one. The commission was bi-partisan and it had access to much more information than we no matter how much reading we do.
Steadfast refusal to come to grips with a portrayal of events and facts which demonstrate that the administration was either really wrong, or deceitful, or both, goes beyond the pale when you propose that the commission gets it wrong and you get it right, or when Ican suggests that the commission must necessarily not be bi-partisan at all because it concluded at odds with the administration.
For any of us to rehash now the claims you advance again seems a bit like having to argue once more that phlogistan or the creation of the world in six days are not viable theses.
I invite you to vote for whomever you wish, but please drop this one.