1
   

Both are correct?

 
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Dec, 2003 05:48 pm
Clary wrote:
McT if you are grumpy you could well be Ratty. Why McTag, I ask? Is there a Gart missing?


Well, the story is not very interesting, and I prefer to be mysterious, but if you insist...

I was nicknamed by my work colleagues Taggart, after the irascible, argumentative Glaswegian TV detective of that name. Or "Tag" for short. Why they chose that name for me, I can't imagine.
So, when I chose an A2K handle, I chose McTag to emphasise the Scottish connection. That's all.

Why "Clary"?
0 Replies
 
Clary
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Dec, 2003 05:55 pm
Sorry to pry, but it gives me a good insight into your character if you are Taggart!Smile
Clary is a small white flower with healing powers but I am really Clare; when I came to get a hotmail account Clare was taken but Clary (which my family and old friends call me) wasn't. I like being called by my name, makes me feel you are friends out there!
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Dec, 2003 07:53 pm
Clary, weren't you Clary Sage for a while? Where'd the "sage" go?
0 Replies
 
Clary
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 02:08 am
Yes, I thought it sounded a bit pretentious even though it is only a flower! As though I had wisdom coming out of my fingertips!

So where did Piffka come from?
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 09:23 am
Two explanations, one short & one long.
Someone once gave me a sage plant with kind words about being one, etc. However, I used it to flavor a turkey stuffing and guess I cut it back too far. I like your name both ways, Clary. One of my grandmas was named Clara. It has a beautiful sound.


Piffka is the sound of hot air coming out of a light addled bear of little brain when tapped in her plexus.















____
It is also a whimsical way of pronoucing pfk. When I first was online, on the New York Times Abuzz, that ill-fated though still-going forum, I used Mr. Piffka's nom, pfkflyer, because I was unwilling to learn how to make my own.

His explanation, apart from those being his intials, was that PF Flyers were an old brand of "canvas" shoe or sneaker. Here's a photo... you can see how some one might love these. Very Happy
http://store5.yimg.com/I/harputsadidas_1768_25765505However, they may be the shoes that exacerbated problems with Mr.Piffka's very flat feet since it is my understanding that he wore them a lot. Anyway, when we were first online, on AOL, he wanted pfflyer but it wasn't available so he settled for the other.

It worked well because we were a "pair" -- just like a pair of shoes. Also sneakers is a fun words to say and PF Flyers had a cute slogan... Run Faster... Jump Higher.

Quote:
Charlie's Sneaker FAQ & Glossary
http://sneakers.pair.com/small/pf-mil.jpg

A brand of sneakers that are now mainly of historic interest. Exclamation Originally made by B. F. Goodrich. Advertised as making their wearer "Run Faster... Jump Higher." Their sneaker division later on merged with Converse.. Mainly of interest to those watching the movie "The Sandlot." The "PF Flyers" name has been around a few times since the Baby Boomers were kids.

1937: B. F. Goodrich brought them out.
1971: Converse bought the Goodrich athletic shoe brands.
Converse soon after spun off the PF Flyers brand to settle a Department of Justice complaint they were monopolizing the sneaker market (such as it was) of that day. Converse kept the Jack Purcell line for their own.
1991: LJO, Inc. buys rights to the PF Flyers name and produced some product under the name... but they looked like a canvas Reebok Freestyle.
2001: New Balance buys rights to the PF Flyers brand.
2003: New PF Flyers products (updated with New Balance's ABZORB technology) are rolling out to the stores!




____

<In the long run (Get it, long run?) I prefer the first. It is just as accurate and frankly I'm a little bit offended by that "historic" dig. Exclamation >

I was happily surprised to see while doing my little bit of research that PF Flyers are again available and with New Balance technology. All of my sneakers have been New Balance since I ruptured my A. tendon (my soccer//your football) and had to learn to be careful. They are very good.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 09:44 am
How about I learned the area where I live got its power cut?

That seems clearer to me.....
0 Replies
 
Clary
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 09:50 am
Pfk, what an interesting history you have! All down to a couple of old canvas shoes. I feel very uninventive!

Bi=polar, that sentence of yours doesn't make sense to me. Are we talking about a single power cut or several, a tendency?
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 10:28 am
Re: Both are correct?
Clary -- <grin> Well don't feel that way, most of the history is not mine at all. I have never had a pair of PF Flyers!

oristarA wrote:
(1) I found the area where I live got power cut.

(2) I found the area where I live get power cut.

In my opinion, the two sentences are all correct. Cos (1) can be read as " I found (that) the area where I live got power cut', while (2) can be read as " I found the area where I live (to) get power cut".

What do you think about this question? TIA.


Hmmm. "Got" is such an unattractive word in this usage. It is also colloquial. The point is made, but my preference would be "had" if the event were in the past, "has" if it is current, or "will have" if it is expected to happen in the future.

Adding BPB's "its" makes sense to me, Clary, but that's probably because both he and I are from the states where whole areas may lose power which we sometimes take personally. Found and learned seem fairly interchangeable and could also be replaced by read, heard, saw, was told, etc.

Do the outlying areas of the UK lose power often? Do parts of China?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Both are correct?
  3. » Page 5
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 05:55:43