1
   

Your voting record

 
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Dec, 2003 09:27 pm
OCCOM BILL wrote:
1984: Couldn't vote yet, so we knocked down every Mondale/Ferraro sign in the city limits. Twisted Evil
1988: George Bush… Dukakis struck me as an idiot (easily the dopiest VP candidates in history too… potatoe). Shocked
1992: Ross Perot… Campaigned heavily for him (Broke my heart when he quit). Crying or Very sad
1996: Ross Perot… Campaigned heavily for him (Got straight screwed by the old school). Crying or Very sad
2000: Ralph Nader… Couldn't see any difference between Gore and Bush (posers). Mad
2004: Leaning towards General Wesley Clark. Idea


This is the same voting pattern as I have had...minus the fascinating comments though and voting for Clark. I strongly believe in the need of a third party in American politics. Thus, I will generally vote for a third party candidate unless I feel that the third party guy is a complete nut. I voted for Perot, so you can see I mean a REAL nut...

Once McCain lost the Republican primary, I lost interest in the republican candidate. Gore is a complete waste, so that left Nader. *sigh* I still wish McCain would have ran for the Republican primary again this time around. He would be such a good president.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Dec, 2003 10:01 pm
My Clark consideration is because of his experience in matters of defense and I was impressed with his commentary on CNN during the "heavy fighting". If he doesn't make it to the big dance, I'm back to the drawing board.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Dec, 2003 10:15 pm
McGentrix, you voted Nader!?

Da-amn ... ! <grins>
0 Replies
 
fbaezer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Dec, 2003 01:09 pm
nimh wrote:
fbaezer, what party did you stand for in '73, if I may ask? And yeh, like what she asked: did you win?


Nah, no party (I tought that was understood).
I was 19, planned not to voto but was chosen to be a poll booth vote counter. Federal representative elections (always rigged, those days)
There was a space for "non-registered" candidates. So I convinced 2 friends to vote for me.
With 3 votes, I beat the Party of the Authentic Mexican Revolution on our polling booth. Smile

But now I recall I was once a candidate for Congress, in 1982: number 16 on the Unified Socialist Party of Mexico ticket for the Mexico City circunscription. I had no chance: we got only 5 or 6 out of that ticket.

On 1988 I was offered a "sure spot" on the Mexican Socialist Party ticket, but refused on the (solid) grounds that I was backing another Presidential candidate (really, because I knew the "sure spot" for me was a way to block another -more relevant, but less accomodating- member of my faction to get that spot).

On 2000 I was offered by the Social Democrats to be "Delegacion" (submayoral) candidate for downtown Mexico City. With no chances of winning and the need to suspend my job as a journalist during the campaign (not ethical to be press and candidate, IMO), I declined.

----

On an aside... American politics isn't that black & white as it seems.
dyslexia and McGentrix voted for the same Presidencial candidate!

-----

The UK has great parties.
I remember the Let's Have a Party Party and the Fancy Dress Party.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 May, 2004 06:54 pm
Just re-read this: it sure was an interesting thread!

I guess there's litle chance of Hobitbob, OCCOM BILL, Dys and McGentrix voting for the same candidate this time 'round ... and I wonder whether McG still thinks McCain would be "such a good President".

fbaezer, a propos the Let's Have a Party Party, I think for the last elections here, the registrations included that of the Yet Another New Party ...
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 May, 2004 08:10 pm
Dukakis
Clinton
Clinton
Gore

I vote liberal all the way. I was really tempted to vote for Nader in 200 and was undecided until I went into the booth. I went with solidarity, but I knew MA would carry Gore with or without my vote.

I voted AGAINST Mitt Romney.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 May, 2004 09:29 pm
1960 Too young, but passionately wanted Kennedy
to win - later wanted to join the Peace Corps
1964 Johnson
1968 Nixon
1972 Nixon
1976 Carter
1980 Reagan
1984 Reagan
1988 Bush the elder
1992 Bush the elder
1996 Dole
2000 Bush the second
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 May, 2004 06:51 am
I wish there was someway we could force McCain to be president... What's the line of succession?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 May, 2004 03:12 pm
The idea is - make Bush lose by such a startling margin that the Republican party will be shocked into a fundamental change of course - and repudiate the Bush / war cabinet clique.

If the Republican mainstream will somehow get to perceive the Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld line as the cause of a landslide defeat, McCain, as a famous, respected Republican who from the start warned against that line, will be perfectly placed for succession.

Even a narrow defeat will probably still have the Bush people holding on to dominance in the party, for now - and McCain blamed for causing a defeat that could supposedly have been avoided by "party unity".

Is my guess ;-)
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 May, 2004 03:20 pm
Sorry nimh, the off shore casinos still have Bush favored 6 to 5... And I assure you it is not in their best interest to sell Bush.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 May, 2004 03:29 pm
1984 Reagan
1988 Bush 41
1992 Perot (mistake)
1996 Dole
2000 Bush 43

More importantly, I almost always vote NO on propositions. I'm waiting for a proposition for no more propositions. That one I might go for.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 May, 2004 03:51 pm
Oh, I didnt say a landslide Bush defeat was very likely, Bill - 6 to 5 sounds about right. I just said that if a landslide Bush defeat would occur, that should position McCain quite well ... one more reason to vote against Bush! ;-)
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 May, 2004 06:13 pm
Cringing at 6:5, how can this be? Oh, yeah, I know it is probably spot on.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Oct, 2004 10:20 pm
Bump
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Oct, 2004 11:18 pm
Why you bumpin this one Bill?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Oct, 2004 06:15 am
Threads that go bump in the night?
0 Replies
 
Thok
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Oct, 2004 06:31 am
panzade wrote:
Why bumpin this one [..]


Because probably there will be more voting records.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Oct, 2004 07:22 am
Thok. What would we do without you?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Oct, 2004 08:04 am
<muffled giggle>
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Oct, 2004 08:09 am
Okay, I'll throw mine out there as best I can remember, but it's kind of embarrassing.

Ross Perot
Ross Perot
John McCain (Republican primary)
Harry Brown

For offices other than president, unless there is some reason not to, I usually choose the independent or third party if there is one running.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Your voting record
  3. » Page 4
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 11:38:08